Colorado Rockies

Baseball Prospectus 1996


The Colorado Rockies synopsis should be written by Doug Henning. Mirages run through this organization like bad haggus through a tourist, and they all derive, directly or indirectly, from two sources: thin air and Coors Field. The first illusion is that the Rockies are better off than their twin in Florida, the Marlins. They're not. They finished about 10 games up on the Marlins in 1995, largely due to a bullpen for the ages and injuries to Gary Sheffield and Jeff Conine. The Marlins have built on a foundation of rock; the Rockies have built a sand castle at 5,280 feet. The second illusion is the hazy and alluring vision of the Rockies' alleged "offense." Boudoir stills of Dante Bichette available upon request.

One of the most overlooked facets of understanding player performance is park effects. The park a team calls home has a huge effect on the performances of the players on that team. If a club's management isn't careful, it can be roundly fooled, and greatly misjudge player contributions. The Colorado Rockies will spend their next two dozen years in Coors Field, which is the easiest park in which to hit that this planet has ever seen. The Rockies' management team, however, doesn't seem to notice this fact, and look as if they're about to waste most of the money that the good people of Colorado are carrying through the gates.

The Rockies hit 134 home runs at home in 1995, and only 66 on the road. Perhaps they're just excellent at taking advantage of that home cookin', you say? Uh…no. Rockies' opponents hit 107 HR in Coors Field, and only 53 at home when playing the Purple-Clad bunch. Well, maybe it's just home runs that are so grossly distended, right? Unfortunately not. The Rockies and their opponents hit a whopping .315 at Coors Field, and a pedestrian .252 in games played at venues closer to sea level. Granted, it's hard to really say it's a trend after just one year, but after seeing what happened at Mile High, it's pretty obvious that Coors Field inflates offense by a huge margin.

Who cares? In theory, the Rockies front office should. But do they show any evidence of understanding the drastic effect that Coors Field has on production? Not really. They re-signed Dante Bichette to a two-year deal. Bichette wasn't anything close to the Most Valuable Player in the NL last year; you'd be hard-pressed to make the case that he was the most valuable player on his own team. In addition to re-upping Fonzie Bichette, they seem perfectly content with mediocrities like Vinny Castilla and Andres Galarraga, who they just signed to a hefty contract extension,. This team has a lot to learn from the mistakes of those lovable losers in Chicagoland, but instead, they seem to be fully intent on repeating those lapses in judgment.

The bright spots? Man, oh man, what a bullpen. While pitching half their games in a giant pinball machine, the Rockies' bullpen collectively performed like Greg Maddux. The foursome of Steve Reed, Curtis Leskanic, Bruce Ruffin and Darren Holmes posted a microscopic 2.83 ERA over 282 2/3 innings. That sounds very good, but when you consider the park they called home, that's absolutely astonishing. No bullpen in recent memory has had that kind of success over the course of a season. Does the Rox front office understand that? We're still waiting for evidence.

And the rest of the pitching staff? Pretty darn impressive. The collective bodies that Don Baylor threw to the Gods of High Altitude were last in the league in ERA at 4.96, but taking the park into consideration, that's impressive. You read it here first–any time the Rockie pitching staff is within a run of the league average ERA, they're going to be in the thick of the pennant race. This is approximately as risky as predicting chilly weather in Antarctica. The Rockies already have a championship caliber pitching staff; it's their hitting that stands in the way of a Mile High title. But with the retention of players like Bichette, Castilla, Galarraga and Weiss, it's clear that Rockies' management doesn't yet understand that.

The Rockies' farm system has the market cornered on non-prospects. Approximately one position player, Neifi Perez, is a real prospect, and when the organization gets excited about aging mediocrities like Quinton McCracken, you know the cupboard's bare. The Rockies' best chance to win a playoff spot over the next three years is definitely in 1996, and I don't really think much of their chances there, either. The bullpen had an amazing year in 1995, and isn't very likely to repeat that next year. On top of that the Rockie offense, which wasn't very good, is not young, and isn't as likely to be as "good" in 1996 as it was in '95. Still, the division is wide open, and the deep pockets created by a constantly full house can buy a player or six in the offseason.

If the Rockies are feeling particularly clever, they'll find a team desperate to make the postseason and trade them Dante Bichette in early May. From there, they acquire Warren Newson from Texas for some Jim Lindeman clone, a four-pack of Snapple and a coupon good for a foot massage. Throw Newson in left field, improve the team's offense, and start to stock the incredibly empty farm system.

If you're a Rockies fan, I can't officially advocate that you take over the front office at gunpoint and lecture them repeatedly about park effects while wearing a latex Don Zimmer mask, but I wouldn't turn you in.

Dante Bichette, Indeed.



JASON BATES	1971	IF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	258	50	4	1	3	34	6	2	.194	.288	.252 	.191	49	17
1993	CSP	431	90	8	1	9	35	7	5	.209	.268	.295 	.195	84	29
1994	CSP	434	97	10	2	6	49	4	4	.224	.302	.297 	.211	91	35
1995	COL	312	75	14	3	6	39	3	6	.240	.325	.362 	.238	74	34

1996	PRJ	442	108	21	4	6	44	5	4	.244	.313	.351 	.235	104	45

To give you a little context about the phenomenon that is Coors Field, that .240/.325/.362 translated performance was, in raw statistics, .286/.370/.415. In all fairness, however, Bates did hit half his home runs on the road, and he's young enough that it's possible his improvement is the genuine article. The trend is up, and as long as a guy keeps getting better, you gotta keep running him out there.

DANTE BICHETTE	1964	LF/Park Effects Poster Boy

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	MIL	445	110	16	3	15	21	18	9	.247	.281	.398 	.239	106	48
1992	MIL	394	124	28	3	6	15	21	7	.315	.340	.447 	.279	110	57
1993	COL	523	149	34	4	17	29	14	8	.285	.322	.463 	.271	142	73
1994	COL	474	138	25	2	23	19	24	8	.291	.318	.498 	.283	134	73
1995	COL	558	175	27	2	32	21	12	9	.314	.339	.541 	.296	165	93

1996	PRJ	609	179	21	2	27	20	15	7	.294	.316	.468 	.273	166	85

Dante, or "Fonzie" as he's known on rec.sport.baseball, is the baseball equivalent of a lottery winner. It could just as easily have been Kevin Reimer. MVP? Don't make me laugh. Is probably a better than league average hitter, but only just, and isn't likely to maintain it. When the Rockies develop a legitimate big stick, records are going to fall like so many dead birds. It's a great place to see a game, and it's a lot of fun watching runs score, but you're fooling yourself if you think the performances are comparable. Bichette is this generation's Tony Armas, but with a different kind of really neat hair. Defense is better than the numbers indicate--the park helps other people's fly balls and line drives, too. Interested in learning more? Read The Physics of Baseball by Robert Adair.

JORGE BRITO	1966	C

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	HUN	210	41	7	0	2	22	0	1	.195	.272	.257 	.178	37	11
1991	TAC	72	15	0	0	1	3	0	0	.208	.240	.250 	.160	11	3
1992	HUN	74	15	1	0	2	12	1	0	.203	.314	.297 	.219	16	7
1992	TAC	35	5	1	0	0	2	0	0	.143	.189	.171 	****	-2	0
1993	HUN	37	11	2	0	3	9	0	0	.297	.435	.595 	.343	13	9
1994	NHV	202	42	8	1	3	14	1	0	.208	.259	.302 	.194	39	13
1994	CSP	59	18	2	0	2	6	0	0	.305	.369	.441 	.285	17	9
1995	CSP	93	17	3	1	1	2	0	0	.183	.200	.269 	.145	14	3
1995	COL	50	10	1	0	0	2	1	0	.200	.231	.220 	.147	7	2

ELLIS BURKS	1965	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	BOS	474	123	32	3	14	37	9	11	.259	.313	.428 	.253	120	59
1992	BOS	235	62	9	3	8	24	5	2	.264	.332	.430 	.267	63	32
1993	CWS	497	141	23	4	16	56	8	8	.284	.356	.443 	.276	137	73
1994	COL	145	45	8	2	11	16	3	1	.310	.379	.621 	.329	48	31
1995	CSP	28	8	1	1	1	3	0	0	.286	.355	.500 	.292	8	5
1995	COL	269	65	6	5	11	37	7	3	.242	.333	.424 	.264	71	37

1996	PRJ	341	90	9	2	16	43	5	4	.264	.346	.443 	.273	93	50

Very fragile at this point. Another victim of back injuries, along with Canseco and Mattingly. Could still prosper as a DH a couple of years down the road. Reminds me of a very slightly younger Chili Davis.

MIKE CASE	1969	1B/OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	171	30	4	1	2	12	4	1	.175	.230	.246 	.158	27	7
1993	CNV	440	94	8	1	7	30	10	3	.214	.264	.284 	.193	85	28
1994	NHV	372	87	12	1	5	31	8	3	.234	.293	.312 	.216	80	31
1995	NHV	316	75	10	1	9	34	5	2	.237	.311	.361 	.238	75	34

PETE CASTELLANO	1970	3B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	WNS	465	117	14	1	8	50	7	5	.252	.324	.338 	.235	109	47
1992	CHR	149	30	2	0	1	17	0	0	.201	.283	.235 	.175	26	8
1992	IOW	238	57	12	3	1	29	2	2	.239	.322	.328 	.230	55	23
1993	CSP	288	71	9	1	8	29	3	3	.247	.315	.368 	.240	69	31
1993	COL	70	11	3	0	2	8	1	1	.157	.244	.286 	.176	12	4
1994	CSP	112	32	7	1	2	10	1	1	.286	.344	.420 	.267	30	15
1995	CSP	321	71	13	1	7	20	2	0	.221	.267	.333 	.210	67	25

VINNY CASTILLA	1968	3B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	GRN	263	68	12	1	7	4	0	1	.259	.270	.392 	.230	60	25
1991	RIC	241	52	4	2	7	8	1	1	.216	.241	.336 	.198	48	17
1992	RIC	451	108	21	1	6	18	1	2	.239	.269	.330 	.208	94	34
1993	COL	329	77	8	5	7	14	2	5	.234	.265	.353 	.212	70	26
1994	CSP	75	14	4	1	0	6	0	0	.187	.247	.267 	.170	13	4
1994	COL	127	40	9	1	2	7	2	1	.315	.351	.449 	.281	36	18
1995	COL	510	145	24	2	26	28	2	8	.284	.322	.492 	.274	140	73

1996	PRJ	640	173	25	4	21	24	3	5	.270	.297	.420 	.249	159	73

Uh...yeah. This is what happens when you add Jose Valentin to Coors Field, shake vigorously, and stand back. What do the critics say about him? "The Mother of all Fluke Years!"--Saddam Hussein. "27 years old, in Coors Field, during a year of inflated offense? Nope, there's still reasonable doubt."--Johnnie Cochran. "How did you find me here?"--Salman Rushdie.

ALAN COCKRELL	1963	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	CLG	421	101	14	1	9	33	6	3	.240	.295	.342 	.225	95	39
1992	CSP	255	53	5	1	6	17	0	1	.208	.257	.306 	.192	49	16
1993	CHR	276	73	8	1	6	21	0	0	.264	.316	.366 	.241	67	29
1994	NHV	43	12	1	0	1	2	2	0	.279	.311	.372 	.252	11	5
1994	CSP	256	64	7	1	8	24	1	1	.250	.314	.379 	.243	62	28
1995	CSP	338	88	11	1	9	25	0	2	.260	.311	.379 	.241	81	36

STU COLE	1966	SS

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	OMA	445	110	13	4	3	32	11	7	.247	.298	.315 	.218	97	38
1992	MEM	178	39	6	1	0	16	6	4	.219	.284	.264 	.193	34	12
1992	OMA	206	38	4	0	4	23	4	4	.184	.266	.262 	.179	37	12
1993	CSP	310	68	11	1	4	28	7	4	.219	.284	.300 	.206	64	24
1994	CSP	270	65	10	1	4	18	6	2	.241	.288	.330 	.220	60	24
1995	CSP	200	45	9	1	2	14	1	2	.225	.276	.310 	.202	40	14

CRAIG COUNSELL	1971	SS

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	62	10	1	1	0	5	0	1	.161	.224	.210 	.116	7	1
1993	CNV	459	95	12	1	4	63	7	4	.207	.303	.264 	.200	92	33
1994	NHV	303	76	11	1	4	29	3	1	.251	.316	.333 	.232	70	30
1995	CSP	382	88	14	3	4	29	9	2	.230	.285	.314 	.214	82	31

ANGEL ECHEVARRIA	1971	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	206	31	0	0	3	10	3	1	.150	.190	.194 	.084	17	2
1993	CNV	351	72	7	1	4	25	3	2	.205	.258	.265 	.177	62	19
1994	CNV	190	48	3	1	4	5	1	1	.253	.272	.342 	.215	41	15
1994	NHV	206	46	2	0	6	12	2	2	.223	.266	.320 	.203	42	15
1995	NHV	460	134	17	1	18	45	7	3	.291	.354	.450 	.281	129	69
Looks like a real hitter, but with suspect defense. Geronimo Berroa might be a good analog. Will probably hit if he gets a shot to play. Should spend next year at Colorado Springs, and we'll see how many HR he can pump. Looks like a potential 30 HR guy to me, which means 50 in Coors Field.

JAY GAINER	1967	1B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	HDS	496	106	9	1	17	27	2	1	.214	.254	.339 	.205	102	37
1992	WIC	386	100	7	1	19	41	3	1	.259	.330	.430 	.265	102	52
1993	CSP	280	65	5	1	7	17	3	1	.232	.276	.332 	.214	60	23
1993	COL	40	6	1	0	2	4	1	1	.150	.227	.325 	.184	7	3
1994	CSP	271	53	8	1	5	21	2	2	.196	.253	.288 	.183	50	16
1995	CSP	342	84	7	1	17	35	2	2	.246	.316	.421 	.255	87	43

ANDRES GALARRAGA	1961	1B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	MON	384	95	13	2	11	23	5	5	.247	.290	.378 	.232	89	38
1992	LOU	34	6	1	1	1	0	1	0	.176	.176	.353 	.184	6	2
1992	STL	328	86	14	2	12	13	5	4	.262	.290	.427 	.248	81	38
1993	COL	454	156	28	3	18	24	2	4	.344	.377	.537 	.310	141	81
1994	COL	407	125	17	1	25	20	9	3	.307	.340	.538 	.299	121	69
1995	COL	538	138	23	3	24	30	11	2	.257	.296	.444 	.258	139	68

1996	PRJ	460	120	18	2	21	26	7	2	.261	.300	.446 	.260	120	59

The symptom. Not a particularly great or even good hitter, but looks good because he plays in Colorado. Defensive reputation is very good, but probably a bit inflated. A real albatross. Unlikely to be in the top half or even four-fifths of first basemen next year, but a fan favorite. Can't think of too many players I'd rather not have. As long as the Rockies keep wasting their time and money on players like him and Bichette, they'll be also-rans.

WEBSTER GARRISON	1966	2B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	HUN	114	29	5	0	3	13	4	1	.254	.331	.377 	.254	29	14
1991	TAC	236	45	7	1	2	20	3	0	.191	.254	.254 	.173	41	12
1992	HUN	355	95	18	2	8	26	7	4	.268	.318	.397 	.252	89	42
1992	TAC	116	27	3	1	2	0	1	1	.233	.233	.328 	.192	22	7
1993	TAC	529	137	16	2	6	46	13	6	.259	.318	.331 	.233	123	52
1994	CSP	487	117	17	2	8	37	15	4	.240	.294	.333 	.226	110	45
1995	CSP	439	106	19	2	10	39	11	3	.241	.303	.362 	.237	104	46

TRENT HUBBARD	1966	CF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	JAC	453	115	14	2	2	46	24	10	.254	.323	.307 	.231	105	45
1992	TUC	410	113	13	2	3	34	25	7	.276	.331	.339 	.248	102	47
1993	CSP	417	102	13	3	5	36	23	11	.245	.305	.326 	.228	95	41
1994	CSP	297	85	11	2	5	35	24	8	.286	.361	.387 	.273	81	43
1995	CSP	452	125	15	3	10	52	34	11	.277	.351	.389 	.269	122	63
1995	COL	56	16	4	0	2	7	2	1	.286	.365	.464 	.288	16	9

TERRY JONES	1971	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1993	BND	138	31	3	2	0	4	6	3	.225	.246	.275 	.184	25	8
1993	CNV	71	15	1	0	0	6	2	0	.211	.273	.225 	.177	13	4
1994	CNV	532	128	11	1	1	28	25	8	.241	.279	.271 	.201	107	37
1995	NHV	479	120	9	1	1	28	39	14	.251	.292	.280 	.215	103	40

DAVID KENNEDY	1971	1B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1993	BOI	254	48	7	1	5	41	1	0	.189	.302	.283 	.206	52	20
1995	NHV	491	145	15	1	18	37	3	1	.295	.345	.440 	.275	135	69

CED LANDRUM	1964	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	IOW	131	42	7	1	1	3	12	3	.321	.336	.412 	.275	36	18
1991	CHC	87	22	2	1	0	10	25	4	.253	.330	.299 	.269	23	13
1992	DEN	140	36	3	0	1	11	13	6	.257	.311	.300 	.227	32	14
1993	NOR	278	79	9	3	4	17	16	5	.284	.325	.381 	.257	71	34
1995	CSP	160	33	2	1	2	9	11	4	.206	.249	.269 	.188	30	10

LEW LIST	1966	DH

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	AUG	35	9	0	0	1	4	0	0	.257	.333	.343 	.241	8	4
1991	SLM	334	87	12	2	7	25	7	2	.260	.312	.371 	.244	81	37
1992	GAS	187	56	5	1	6	16	3	4	.299	.355	.433 	.273	51	26
1992	TUL	132	35	5	1	1	12	1	1	.265	.326	.341 	.237	31	13
1993	CNV	117	27	4	1	4	10	0	1	.231	.291	.385 	.232	27	12
1993	TUL	125	20	1	1	0	9	2	3	.160	.216	.184 	.095	12	2
1993	CSP	48	12	5	0	0	2	0	0	.250	.280	.354 	.222	11	4
1994	NHV	274	62	6	1	6	25	1	1	.226	.291	.321 	.214	59	23
1995	NHV	215	58	8	2	5	15	2	2	.270	.317	.395 	.250	54	25

CHITO MARTINEZ	1966	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	ROC	208	64	6	1	15	20	2	1	.308	.368	.562 	.313	65	40
1991	BAL	218	63	11	1	14	10	1	1	.289	.320	.541 	.290	63	35
1992	BAL	199	57	11	1	5	31	0	1	.286	.383	.427 	.284	56	31
1993	ROC	144	35	6	0	4	10	0	0	.243	.292	.368 	.231	33	14
1994	COH	301	80	12	3	12	42	0	1	.266	.356	.445 	.277	83	45
1995	CSP	108	14	4	0	3	10	0	2	.130	.203	.250 	.126	14	3

1996	PRJ	500	126	22	2	27	66	0	0	.252	.339	.466 	.277	139	76

Coors Field can still make this guy a star. About as good a hitter as Dante Bichette. A little more isolated power, a few more walks, a slightly lower average. His defense apparently draws flies, though. And not the good kind.

QUINTON MCCRACKEN	1970	CF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	232	43	3	1	1	13	6	3	.185	.229	.220 	.143	33	7
1993	CNV	470	103	9	3	2	49	29	10	.219	.293	.264 	.206	97	36
1994	NHV	548	133	16	2	4	37	27	12	.243	.291	.301 	.215	118	46
1995	NHV	224	75	9	3	1	16	21	6	.335	.379	.415 	.291	65	35
1995	CSP	229	68	8	3	3	19	15	5	.297	.351	.397 	.271	62	32
What is it with General Managers and speed? Every time some GM picks up, signs or drafts a guy who obviously can't hit, they rave about his blazing speed. McCracken can run, and has shown significant improvement with the wood. I think it's a fluke, but he's certainly earned at least a full time spot in AAA to show his stuff. Great name.

JOHN MYROW	1972	OF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1993	BND	265	41	3	0	3	2	5	2	.155	.161	.200 	.053	14	1
1994	CNV	517	119	15	1	5	16	15	4	.230	.253	.292 	.194	100	33
1995	NHV	358	83	12	1	3	18	13	4	.232	.269	.296 	.203	73	26

JAYHAWK OWENS	1969	C

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	VIS	234	46	7	1	4	21	7	3	.197	.263	.286 	.193	45	16
1992	ORL	333	81	11	1	5	32	8	1	.243	.310	.327 	.230	77	32
1993	CSP	165	41	6	1	4	17	4	2	.248	.319	.370 	.244	40	19
1993	COL	84	16	2	0	3	6	1	0	.190	.244	.321 	.196	16	6
1994	CSP	245	52	6	3	4	26	3	2	.212	.288	.310 	.209	51	20
1995	CSP	211	53	6	2	10	17	2	1	.251	.307	.441 	.258	55	27
1995	COL	44	10	2	0	3	2	0	0	.227	.261	.477 	.250	11	5

1996	PRJ	261	64	8	1	12	25	2	1	.245	.311	.421 	.255	67	33

This is a prospect in this organization. Very impressive release on the throw down to second. Not much with the bat yet, but he looks like he could bust out for an acceptable peak, particularly in Coors. Certainly an improvement over Joe Girardi, and sometimes old rookies go on to nice careers. I might take a flyer on him, but I'd do so knowing he's probably not going to be very good. Might blossom into a Terry Steinbach-type player for a few years, with a few more walks. Unlike the other authors, I like him a little. Out until May.

NEIFI PEREZ	1975	SS

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1993	BND	298	58	6	1	2	4	7	6	.195	.205	.242 	.138	41	9
1994	CNV	505	98	8	4	1	20	5	4	.194	.225	.232 	.142	72	16
1995	NHV	432	104	19	2	5	16	4	2	.241	.268	.329 	.209	90	33
1995	CSP	35	8	3	0	0	0	1	1	.229	.229	.314 	.185	6	2
Gotta like that trend and age. Neifi poked 36 extra-base hits in 427 AB in New Haven, and is only 21 next year. EqA has steadily risen over three years; The Rockies seem to actually have themselves a bona fide prospect! He needs to learn not to swing at anything within a three-county area, but it looks very promising for Perez, who could be ready to take over in Coors when Weiss' new two-year deal is up.

HARVEY PULLIAM	1968	LF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	OMA	349	87	13	1	6	23	2	1	.249	.296	.344 	.226	79	32
1991	KCR	33	10	1	0	3	3	0	0	.303	.361	.606 	.319	11	7
1992	OMA	360	96	7	1	14	28	4	2	.267	.320	.408 	.255	92	44
1993	OMA	206	51	6	0	4	15	1	0	.248	.299	.335 	.225	46	19
1993	KCR	62	16	5	0	1	1	0	0	.258	.270	.387 	.229	14	6
1994	LVG	304	58	7	0	12	17	0	1	.191	.234	.332 	.190	58	20
1995	CSP	385	107	16	2	19	41	6	2	.278	.347	.478 	.285	110	61

JEFF REED	1963	C

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	CIN	272	75	15	2	3	23	0	1	.276	.332	.379 	.251	68	31
1993	SFG	121	33	5	0	5	16	0	1	.273	.358	.438 	.275	33	18
1994	SFG	103	19	1	0	1	11	0	0	.184	.263	.223 	.158	16	4
1995	SFG	114	32	1	0	0	20	0	0	.281	.388	.289 	.251	29	13
Good backup catcher, can provide a few walks and line drives from the left side. Will bounce from team to team until he retires. Has just landed in Denver, and I'll bet he's renting.

MARK STRITTMATTER	1969	C

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	BND	101	17	2	0	1	7	0	1	.168	.222	.218 	.123	12	2
1993	CNV	175	34	2	0	2	20	1	0	.194	.277	.240 	.177	31	9
1994	NHV	218	43	3	0	2	27	1	1	.197	.286	.239 	.179	39	12
1995	NHV	294	68	8	1	6	38	1	0	.231	.319	.327 	.230	68	29

TY VAN BURKLEO	1964	1B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1992	EDM	445	108	17	2	18	60	16	4	.243	.333	.411 	.263	117	61
1993	VAN	357	88	11	1	5	42	5	2	.246	.326	.325 	.233	83	36
1993	CAL	33	5	3	0	1	6	1	0	.152	.282	.333 	.218	7	3
1994	CSP	405	87	14	2	12	68	4	3	.215	.328	.348 	.238	96	44
1995	CSP	221	53	8	1	10	24	2	1	.240	.314	.421 	.255	56	28

JOHN VANDERWAL	1966	PH/UTIL

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	IND	482	139	27	4	15	65	7	1	.288	.373	.454 	.290	140	78
1991	MON	62	15	5	1	1	1	0	0	.242	.254	.403 	.228	14	6
1992	MON	214	54	8	2	5	26	3	0	.252	.333	.379 	.254	54	26
1993	MON	216	52	7	4	4	27	6	3	.241	.325	.366 	.245	53	25
1994	COL	108	25	3	1	4	15	2	1	.231	.325	.389 	.251	27	13
1995	COL	96	31	5	1	4	15	1	1	.323	.414	.521 	.320	31	19
Reminds one of Jim Dwyer. Was probably a good enough hitter to have a nice little career in the bigs, but never really got the chance. Perhaps Dwight Smith is a better analog?

LARRY WALKER	1967	RF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	MON	504	164	30	2	19	43	15	8	.325	.378	.506 	.304	153	89
1992	MON	533	169	28	3	28	44	18	5	.317	.369	.538 	.310	165	99
1993	MON	494	135	21	4	21	79	31	7	.273	.373	.460 	.295	145	86
1994	MON	391	127	34	2	18	47	18	6	.325	.397	.560 	.325	127	81
1995	COL	476	133	23	4	29	47	15	3	.279	.344	.527 	.297	142	83

1996	PRJ	522	157	29	2	30	57	22	5	.301	.370	.536 	.311	162	100

I was disappointed in his year, but others weren't. Bichette won't be close to him next year. Will his shoulder hold up over a full season? Probably so. It'd be nice to have those 30 walks he produced out of thin air in '93 back. Once auditioned to sing for the Trammps, who produced the big hit "Disco Inferno" on the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack. Some guys can do it all. {Now he's gonna get some strange letters, no doubt.}

DAN WALTERS	1967	C

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	LVG	281	73	9	1	4	16	0	0	.260	.300	.342 	.227	64	25
1992	LVG	121	42	3	0	3	7	0	0	.347	.383	.446 	.294	36	19
1992	SDP	180	48	10	1	5	11	1	0	.267	.309	.417 	.254	46	22
1993	LVG	214	49	5	0	4	10	1	1	.229	.263	.308 	.198	42	14
1993	SDP	94	19	3	0	1	7	0	0	.202	.257	.266 	.176	17	5
1995	CSP	149	35	4	1	3	6	0	0	.235	.265	.336 	.209	31	11

WALT WEISS	1964	SS

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	OAK	134	33	6	1	0	12	8	0	.246	.308	.306 	.233	31	13
1992	OAK	318	73	5	2	0	43	7	3	.230	.321	.258 	.210	67	25
1993	FLA	500	132	10	2	1	78	7	3	.264	.363	.298 	.242	121	54
1994	COL	414	98	7	2	1	55	13	7	.237	.326	.271 	.217	90	35
1995	COL	411	94	9	2	1	92	14	3	.229	.370	.268 	.240	98	45

1996	PRJ	439	105	12	2	0	72	9	4	.239	.346	.276 	.228	100	42

Man, when this guy first came up, he was the best defensive shortstop I had ever seen, including the Wizard in his prime. My friend called him "The guy who would play defense with Mazeroski someday in God's infield." My words couldn't possibly do him justice. Eric Gelatt, a longtime friend of mine, used to go to a couple of extra A's games a year just to watch Walt play defense. Injuries can be real bastards. Good friends with Jose Canseco, and has worked hard to become valuable on offense. In 1993, a lot of those walks were intentional, but he's still getting on base a bunch, and he won't hurt you in the field, even after all the leg injuries.

BILLY WHITE	1969	2B

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	CHR	408	101	12	2	4	53	10	6	.248	.334	.316 	.234	95	41
1992	CHR	408	93	5	1	4	41	8	4	.228	.298	.275 	.204	83	30
1993	DAY	124	36	5	1	3	12	1	0	.290	.353	.419 	.274	34	17
1993	ORL	121	26	6	1	2	13	1	1	.215	.291	.331 	.217	26	10
1994	NHV	239	51	4	0	2	30	0	2	.213	.301	.255 	.192	46	15
1995	NHV	185	41	4	1	3	22	2	2	.222	.304	.303 	.213	39	15

ERIC YOUNG	1967	2B/LF

YEAR	TEAM	AB	H	DB	TP	HR	BB	SB	CS	BA	OBA 	SA	EQA	EQH	EQR
1991	SAN	464	116	13	2	3	48	45	17	.250	.320	.306 	.235	109	49
1992	ABQ	337	98	13	3	3	24	20	7	.291	.338	.374 	.259	87	42
1992	LAD	135	39	0	0	2	9	6	1	.289	.333	.333 	.248	33	15
1993	COL	477	114	11	5	3	61	40	17	.239	.325	.302 	.233	111	50
1994	COL	223	57	11	1	5	37	19	7	.256	.362	.381 	.269	60	33
1995	COL	351	100	16	7	4	47	32	11	.285	.369	.405 	.280	98	54

1996	PRJ	599	162	24	8	5	93	51	17	.270	.368	.362 	.270	162	86

A common problem: a bat that's good enough if he can play the more demanding defensive position well, but not enough to play the easier defensive position. Will have a nice little career now, probably comparable to Jerry Browne. Very similar swing to Terry Steinbach. Everything low in the strike zone is pulled, everything up goes the other way without any pop at all. There's definitely a Dwight Evans influence in that swing.


Organizational Pitching Report

OPR Points: 22	Rank in MLB: 19th (T)	Rank in NL West: 4th
Name		Lvl	Age	IP	Work	H/G	K/BB	K/G	ERA	Adj	Ttl	Grade
Saipe, Mike	3	3	3	0	6	7	8	3	+1	34	B+
Kusiewicz, M.	0	6	6	0	6	7	5	5	-1	34 	B+
Jones, Bobby	7	2	5	0	3	2	8	1	+1	29	C
Crowther, Brent	1	0	9	0	4	6	3	4	0	27 	C-
Walls, Doug	3	3	2	0	6	2	7	2	+1	26	D+
Wright, Jamey	3	5	9	0	3	0	0	4	+1	25 	D
Moore, Joel	6	3	8	0	2	1	1	3	0	24	D
Brownson, Mark	1	3	5	0	1	6	6	2	0	24 	D

Best Prospect in 1994: Juan Acevedo (A)	Best Rookie Starter in 1995: Brian Rekar (NR)


ROGER BAILEY	1971	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	BND	56.0	70	35	9	37	45	5.62	2	4	11.25	5.95 	7.23
1993	CNV	99.0	149	73	15	51	64	6.64	3	8	13.55	4.64 	5.82
1994	NHV	145.0	197	86	12	63	92	5.34	6	10	12.23	3.91 	5.71
1995	CSP	15.7	14	7	0	9	7	4.02	1	1	8.04	5.17 	4.02
1995	COL	80.7	80	36	9	39	32	4.02	4	5	8.93	4.35 	3.57

JOHN BURKE	1970	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	BND	34.7	53	28	7	22	18	7.27	1	3	13.76	5.71 	4.67
1993	CNV	108.7	111	63	9	62	88	5.22	4	8	9.19	5.13 	7.29
1993	CSP	45.3	39	18	1	24	33	3.57	3	2	7.74	4.76 	6.55
1994	ASH	16.7	5	2	3	6	10	1.08	2	0	2.70	3.24 	5.40
1994	CSP	9.7	12	13	0	20	5	12.10	0	1	11.17	18.62 	4.66
1995	CSP	82.3	74	38	9	50	67	4.15	4	5	8.09	5.47 	7.32

ALBERT BUSTILLOS	1968	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	BAK	39.3	37	19	5	14	26	4.35	2	2	8.47	3.20 	5.95
1991	SAN	85.3	125	49	10	17	39	5.17	3	6	13.18	1.79 	4.11
1992	SAN	12.0	10	4	0	4	8	3.00	1	0	7.50	3.00 	6.00
1992	ABQ	35.3	40	17	5	15	23	4.33	2	2	10.19	3.82 	5.86
1993	ABQ	28.0	35	16	4	14	15	5.14	1	2	11.25	4.50 	4.82
1994	SAN	59.3	87	31	4	17	27	4.70	3	4	13.20	2.58 	4.10
1994	ABQ	40.3	51	27	5	15	23	6.02	1	3	11.38	3.35 	5.13
1995	CSP	126.0	144	67	20	33	77	4.79	6	8	10.29	2.36 	5.50

JIM CZAJKOWSKI	1964	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	ELP	72.0	97	43	9	25	55	5.38	3	5	12.12	3.12 	6.88
1992	ELP	72.7	99	44	11	32	48	5.45	3	5	12.26	3.96 	5.94
1993	ORL	18.0	16	8	0	3	13	4.00	1	1	8.00	1.50 	6.50
1993	IOW	67.0	67	28	3	34	43	3.76	4	3	9.00	4.57 	5.78
1994	CSP	60.3	48	19	4	17	34	2.83	5	2	7.16	2.54 	5.07
1995	CSP	78.3	85	44	10	53	55	5.06	3	6	9.77	6.09 	6.32

MIKE DEJEAN	1971	RRP	

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	ONE	19.7	16	6	4	3	11	2.75	1	1	7.32	1.37 	5.03
1993	GRB	15.3	28	15	3	9	10	8.80	0	2	16.43	5.28 	5.87
1994	TAM	30.7	44	17	2	14	18	4.99	1	2	12.91	4.11 	5.28
1994	ABY	22.7	24	14	1	17	10	5.56	1	2	9.53	6.75 	3.97
1995	NRW	74.3	61	28	8	34	47	3.39	5	3	7.39	4.12 	5.69
The Colorado farm system is so devoid of prospects that guys like this start to look good. I mean, none of the authors of this book got together and talked about word limits for essays or prospects ex ante; Chris Kahrl was writing 1700-word lead-ins, and I was limiting myself to 700 or so. It's hardly fair, but for the sake of equity, we need to fill up the Colorado player comment areas with something, and it gets really monotonous (and terse) to just write "What a stiff" 80 times. So you end up with Yankee castoffs looking pretty attractive. Hey. Mike DeJean. Under 28 years old. Walks less than five per nine IP. Um… Hell. I guess I'll wax on about Jayhawk Owens. That way, at least the park effects work in my favor.

MICHAEL FARMER	1969	LBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	CLR	49.3	44	28	6	18	32	5.11	2	3	8.03	3.28 	5.84
1993	REA	94.0	142	70	21	36	54	6.70	3	7	13.60	3.45 	5.17
1994	CNV	26.7	30	17	6	12	20	5.74	1	2	10.12	4.05 	6.75
1994	NHV	13.0	9	3	1	6	11	2.08	1	0	6.23	4.15 	7.62
1995	NHV	103.7	129	63	13	35	65	5.47	4	8	11.20	3.04 	5.64

SCOTT FREDRICKSON	1968	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	WLO	34.3	36	16	4	16	27	4.19	2	2	9.44	4.19 	7.08
1991	HDS	31.3	35	16	4	17	18	4.60	1	2	10.05	4.88 	5.17
1992	WIC	68.7	56	34	15	45	52	4.46	4	4	7.34	5.90 	6.82
1993	CSP	24.0	21	12	4	20	17	4.50	1	2	7.88	7.50 	6.38
1993	COL	28.3	29	18	3	17	20	5.72	1	2	9.21	5.40 	6.35
1995	CSP	71.3	66	33	3	48	69	4.16	4	4	8.33	6.06 	8.71

MARVIN FREEMAN	1963	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	ATL	48.0	41	20	3	14	37	3.75	3	2	7.69	2.62 	6.94
1992	ATL	64.3	69	30	8	31	47	4.20	3	4	9.65	4.34 	6.58
1993	ATL	23.7	26	17	2	12	27	6.46	1	2	9.89	4.56 	10.27
1994	COL	112.3	100	28	8	24	67	2.24	9	3	8.01	1.92 	5.37
1995	COL	93.7	112	48	12	40	58	4.61	4	6	10.76	3.84 	5.57
That 1994 campaign sure was fantastic. Should have bottled it. Will be fighting for a job the rest of his career. The fact that he's noteworthy says more about the shape of the Rocky farm system than I ever could.

JOHN FRITZ	1969	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	QUD	56.0	62	34	10	25	47	5.46	2	4	9.96	4.02 	7.55
1991	MIA	20.3	26	12	3	12	19	5.31	1	1	11.51	5.31 	8.41
1992	QUD	154.0	188	111	29	82	93	6.49	5	12	10.99	4.79 	5.44
1993	MID	119.3	133	63	18	52	66	4.75	5	8	10.03	3.92 	4.98
1993	VAN	38.3	53	21	3	19	26	4.93	2	2	12.44	4.46 	6.10
1994	MID	56.7	65	36	12	29	36	5.72	2	4	10.32	4.61 	5.72
1994	VAN	51.0	63	32	11	25	28	5.65	2	4	11.12	4.41 	4.94
1995	NWO	78.3	73	36	12	46	54	4.14	4	5	8.39	5.29 	6.20

JOE GRAHE	1968	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	EDM	87.0	120	47	5	29	52	4.86	4	6	12.41	3.00 	5.38
1991	CAL	72.0	93	41	2	33	47	5.12	3	5	11.62	4.12 	5.88
1992	EDM	19.0	17	6	0	4	12	2.84	1	1	8.05	1.89 	5.68
1992	CAL	93.3	87	32	6	38	46	3.09	6	4	8.39	3.66 	4.44
1993	CAL	55.7	57	20	3	23	35	3.23	4	2	9.22	3.72 	5.66
1994	CAL	42.3	65	25	3	16	28	5.31	2	3	13.82	3.40 	5.95
1995	CSP	10.7	6	3	2	3	4	2.53	1	0	5.06	2.53 	3.38
1995	COL	55.7	63	31	6	27	26	5.01	2	4	10.19	4.37 	4.20
The Rockie bullpen was great in spite of this guy last year. Was marginal for years in the AL, and now the tradition continues.

RYAN HAWBLITZEL	1971	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	WNS	120.0	152	63	13	49	75	4.72	5	8	11.40	3.67 	5.62
1991	CHR	31.0	41	19	5	12	20	5.52	1	2	11.90	3.48 	5.81
1992	CHR	162.3	223	108	30	46	101	5.99	6	12	12.36	2.55 	5.60
1993	CSP	154.0	196	94	22	49	77	5.49	6	11	11.45	2.86 	4.50
1994	CSP	154.3	177	86	22	54	95	5.02	7	10	10.32	3.15 	5.54
1995	CSP	79.3	84	39	10	18	40	4.42	4	5	9.53	2.04 	4.54
Hey, there's some good trends here. Hawblitzel doesn't get hurt, maintains his control, and his hits allowed have been in a constant decline. ERA dropping by half a run per year. He's earned a shot, certainly.

DARREN HOLMES	1966	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	MIL	75.0	94	37	6	26	67	4.44	4	4	11.28	3.12 	8.04
1992	DEN	12.7	7	2	1	1	12	1.42	1	0	4.97	.71 	8.53
1992	MIL	41.3	42	14	2	11	38	3.05	3	2	9.15	2.40 	8.27
1993	COL	66.0	49	22	6	21	62	3.00	4	3	6.68	2.86 	8.45
1994	COL	28.0	30	17	5	23	32	5.46	1	2	9.64	7.39 	10.29
1995	COL	66.0	54	19	3	27	59	2.59	5	2	7.36	3.68 	8.05
What a fantastic year. Part of the hidden strength of the Rox, and shows no signs of slowing down. If he had pitched in Chavez or Oakland, his ERA probably would have been right around 2.00. Had a pretty weird platoon split in 1995 – lefties hit 100 points lower against him than righties. Strikes me as a bit crazy. When I was looking at his platoon splits, I was thinking that he reminded me of Vincent D'Onofrio in Full Metal Jacket, but when I look back now, I think Rod Beck's a bit closer. "Everything clean." – Private Pyle.

JOEL JOHNSTON	1967	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	OMA	70.7	67	46	18	43	60	5.86	3	5	8.53	5.48 	7.64
1991	KCR	22.0	9	1	0	9	24	.41	2	0	3.68	3.68 	9.82
1992	OMA	70.3	88	55	11	48	50	7.04	2	6	11.26	6.14 	6.40
1993	BUF	30.0	30	24	7	26	26	7.20	1	2	9.00	7.80 	7.80
1993	PIT	52.7	38	18	8	20	33	3.08	4	2	6.49	3.42 	5.64
1995	CSP	21.3	24	13	1	13	14	5.48	1	1	10.12	5.48 	5.91
1995	PAW	38.3	56	29	5	22	36	6.81	1	3	13.15	5.17 	8.45

MIKE KOTARSKI	1971	LRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	BND	46.7	64	44	4	46	36	8.49	1	4	12.34	8.87 	6.94
1993	CNV	80.7	96	45	14	32	62	5.02	3	6	10.71	3.57 	6.92
1994	CNV	56.3	74	37	11	32	41	5.91	2	4	11.82	5.11 	6.55
1994	NHV	19.3	34	33	11	15	12	15.36	0	2	15.83	6.98 	5.59
1995	NHV	46.3	48	25	6	38	45	4.86	2	3	9.32	7.38 	8.74
1995	CSP	27.7	44	28	7	20	19	9.11	0	3	14.31	6.51 	6.18

CURT LESKANIC	1968	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	KIN	155.0	188	88	19	101	117	5.11	6	11	10.92	5.86 	6.79
1992	ORL	141.7	166	82	23	73	103	5.21	6	10	10.55	4.64 	6.54
1992	POR	14.3	16	12	3	8	14	7.53	0	2	10.05	5.02 	8.79
1993	WIC	41.0	41	23	6	21	33	5.05	2	3	9.00	4.61 	7.24
1993	CSP	41.3	33	18	4	27	33	3.92	3	2	7.19	5.88 	7.19
1993	COL	56.0	52	29	7	27	30	4.66	3	3	8.36	4.34 	4.82
1994	CSP	122.7	115	46	7	56	91	3.38	8	6	8.44	4.11 	6.68
1994	COL	22.3	23	9	2	10	17	3.63	1	1	9.27	4.03 	6.85
1995	COL	97.7	76	28	7	33	103	2.58	8	3	7.00	3.04 	9.49
Sometimes numbers can really do a good job of painting a picture. Take a look down the line at Leskanic's walk rate over the past 5 seasons. Now, I could go into what I think made the difference in terms of mechanics–Curt's arm is no longer flying opening up when he brings the ball over the top, and I think it's really given him more control of all his pitches, but particularly that fastball. But those numbers tell a pretty good story in and of themselves. A great pitcher right now, and I think the improvement's for real.

JOEL MOORE	1973	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1993	BND	82.0	94	41	6	22	49	4.50	4	5	10.32	2.41 	5.38
1994	CNV	119.0	164	75	12	68	63	5.67	4	9	12.40	5.14 	4.76
1995	NHV	145.3	178	70	11	69	86	4.33	7	9	11.02	4.27 	5.33

MIKE MUNOZ	1966	LRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	TOL	50.7	45	28	6	34	36	4.97	2	4	7.99	6.04 	6.39
1992	DET	47.0	47	17	2	24	27	3.26	3	2	9.00	4.60 	5.17
1993	CSP	34.7	43	12	0	9	26	3.12	2	2	11.16	2.34 	6.75
1993	COL	17.7	18	8	2	10	16	4.08	1	1	9.17	5.09 	8.15
1994	COL	45.0	32	16	3	31	32	3.20	3	2	6.40	6.20 	6.40
1995	COL	43.0	49	28	9	27	35	5.86	2	3	10.26	5.65 	7.33
Not too horrible a pitcher, but he's not going to maintain even moderate success with K/W ratios like those. Then again, in this organization, it's not like he's blocking some fantastic prospects or something.

CHRIS NEIER	1972	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1993	BND	68.3	106	55	14	24	35	7.24	2	6	13.96	3.16 	4.61
1994	ASH	50.3	69	30	6	22	31	5.36	2	4	12.34	3.93 	5.54
1994	CNV	25.3	33	11	2	3	17	3.91	2	1	11.72	1.07 	6.04
1995	NHV	112.7	184	78	11	46	62	6.23	4	9	14.70	3.67 	4.95
When this guy pitches, the gaps have more ball traffic than a Jennifer Peace film. (My apologies to those of you who saw this joke in its original form, but I had to use it again. Of all the posts I've made to rec.sport.baseball, this one joke generated the largest response – over 300 people emailed me over the next week. When you start mentioning modeling theory, or talking about minutiae of baseball, you get nothing. When you make a joke about a porn star, people go nuts. It's a strange but wonderful world.)

DAVID NIED	1969	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	GRB	79.0	111	39	2	17	62	4.44	4	5	12.65	1.94 	7.06
1991	DUR	76.7	59	30	6	22	55	3.52	5	4	6.93	2.58 	6.46
1992	RIC	161.0	155	74	21	48	144	4.14	9	9	8.66	2.68 	8.05
1992	ATL	23.0	11	3	0	5	21	1.17	3	0	4.30	1.96 	8.22
1993	COL	85.7	86	38	9	43	47	3.99	5	5	9.04	4.52 	4.94
1994	COL	121.0	120	49	14	47	73	3.64	7	6	8.93	3.50 	5.43
1995	CSP	28.3	29	15	1	26	21	4.76	1	2	9.21	8.26 	6.67
The much-heralded first pick of the 1993 expansion draft. I've heard a lot of Rocky fans ride this guy, but I've never seen him pitch badly, his numbers are pretty good, he's 27 years old…but will he be healthy? Nied is probably best known for his soulful impersonation of a heartless corporate droid who wedges a helpless young woman into a parking spot in a Mentos ad. Winner of three Clios. Is it obvious I'm vamping yet? The Rockies have no talent, folks. They'll need to spend that dough or be patient, or preferably both.

LANCE PAINTER	1968	LRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	WLO	179.3	234	106	33	56	135	5.32	7	13	11.74	2.81 	6.78
1992	WIC	152.7	155	86	22	68	107	5.07	7	10	9.14	4.01 	6.31
1993	CSP	129.0	147	67	14	45	78	4.67	6	8	10.26	3.14 	5.44
1993	COL	38.3	46	19	5	10	16	4.46	2	2	10.80	2.35 	3.76
1994	CSP	67.0	74	31	5	29	54	4.16	3	4	9.94	3.90 	7.25
1994	COL	73.3	80	36	9	26	40	4.42	4	4	9.82	3.19 	4.91
1995	COL	45.0	51	21	7	10	35	4.20	2	3	10.20	2.00 	7.00
Pretty stochastic K rate, which I would interpret as a crap shoot. A crap shoot, as a pitcher coming into Coors Field is a definite no go for any sort of fantasy game. In real life, he could have some value, particularly considering the wear and tear Coors is likely to place on the Rockie pen.

LLOYD PEEVER	1972	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	BND	37.0	64	28	6	9	26	6.81	1	3	15.57	2.19 	6.32
1993	CNV	62.3	73	32	10	10	53	4.62	3	4	10.54	1.44 	7.65
1994	NHV	123.7	133	74	14	41	103	5.39	5	9	9.68	2.98 	7.50
1995	CSP	40.0	42	21	7	16	25	4.72	2	2	9.45	3.60 	5.62
In this organization, this is the closest thing we get to Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, or even Matt Stairs, at least above the A level. The big strike against him is his size–he looks about 5' 10" to me, and he's listed at 6'. In other words, in order to be taken seriously by the people making decisions, he's going to have to be a monster. He's not there yet, but I wouldn't rule it out. If he posts a K rate over eight this year, and has an ERA under five at Colorado Springs, he'll be a keeper. Actually, he's got two years to do it before he starts bouncing from organization to organization.

STEVE REED	1966	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	SHV	20.3	22	6	1	1	22	2.66	1	1	9.74	.44 	9.74
1991	PHX	53.3	60	28	8	11	44	4.72	3	3	10.12	1.86 	7.43
1992	SHV	28.0	21	5	3	1	26	1.61	3	0	6.75	.32 	8.36
1992	PHX	29.7	27	12	3	10	30	3.64	2	1	8.19	3.03 	9.10
1992	SFG	15.7	14	5	2	3	12	2.87	1	1	8.04	1.72 	6.89
1993	COL	83.3	70	34	14	31	52	3.67	5	4	7.56	3.35 	5.62
1994	COL	63.7	69	28	7	25	50	3.96	4	3	9.75	3.53 	7.07
1995	COL	84.0	56	18	8	21	77	1.93	7	2	6.00	2.25 	8.25
Got my #2 vote in the Internet NL Cy Young vote, or more accurately, should have. The problem I have with the DTs for pitchers in Colorado is that they don't take into account the unreasonable split in playing time; bullpen pitchers are going to get a lot more time in the Great Pachinko Palace [tm] than on the road. And Reed was a beast all over the league last year. He's the real thing, folks. If I had to pick a 30-year old reliever who could break out and make a late-career Hall of Fame case, a la Dennis Eckersley, this would be the guy. He and Troy Percival are the best relievers in baseball right now.

BRYAN REKAR	1972	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1993	BND	69.3	102	43	14	5	36	5.58	3	5	13.24	.65 	4.67
1994	CNV	101.0	136	53	5	31	65	4.72	5	6	12.12	2.76 	5.79
1995	NHV	76.7	74	30	7	15	68	3.52	5	4	8.69	1.76 	7.98
1995	CSP	46.7	28	9	1	13	39	1.74	4	1	5.40	2.51 	7.52
1995	COL	84.7	88	38	11	24	58	4.04	4	5	9.35	2.55 	6.17

ARMANDO REYNOSO	1966	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	RIC	123.3	129	44	11	33	93	3.21	9	5	9.41	2.41 	6.79
1991	ATL	23.3	29	19	5	11	11	7.33	1	2	11.19	4.24 	4.24
1992	RIC	160.7	170	66	16	57	98	3.70	10	8	9.52	3.19 	5.49
1993	CSP	21.3	17	8	1	8	19	3.38	1	1	7.17	3.38 	8.02
1993	COL	186.7	181	72	24	66	119	3.47	12	9	8.73	3.18 	5.74
1994	COL	52.0	47	21	5	22	25	3.63	3	3	8.13	3.81 	4.33
1995	CSP	22.0	14	4	2	6	17	1.64	2	0	5.73	2.45 	6.95
1995	COL	92.3	107	45	12	35	38	4.39	5	5	10.43	3.41 	3.70
1966? Uh...yeah! Me too! Won't recover well from a series of injuries. A very good pitcher who could have been in the majors for many years. May still surprise people, including me. That K rate is low, though; not a good sign for his future.

KEVIN RITZ	1965	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	TOL	117.7	124	48	9	57	100	3.67	7	6	9.48	4.36 	7.65
1991	DET	15.0	17	15	2	22	10	9.00	0	2	10.20	13.20 	6.00
1992	DET	78.7	92	47	4	44	68	5.38	3	6	10.53	5.03 	7.78
1994	CSP	33.7	24	5	2	6	25	1.34	4	0	6.42	1.60 	6.68
1994	COL	73.3	77	34	5	34	52	4.17	4	4	9.45	4.17 	6.38
1995	COL	172.0	158	68	16	64	115	3.56	11	8	8.27	3.35 	6.02
Broke out after escaping from a great HR park to the greatest HR park. Has always shown signs of having a bright future –strikes out a lot of guys, avoids allegations of crossdressing, and hasn't had a significant tendency to throw the Jim Acker Slider. If he puts up 175 innings similar to 1995, he's likely to be a very wealthy man. I'll be rooting for him.

BRUCE RUFFIN	1964	LRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	SWB	69.7	85	39	6	39	47	5.04	3	5	10.98	5.04 	6.07
1991	PHI	118.0	137	52	8	40	93	3.97	7	6	10.45	3.05 	7.09
1992	DEN	27.3	29	11	3	8	17	3.62	2	1	9.55	2.63 	5.60
1992	MIL	57.0	80	49	8	43	57	7.74	1	5	12.63	6.79 	9.00
1993	COL	137.3	126	51	11	71	128	3.34	9	6	8.26	4.65 	8.39
1994	COL	55.0	48	20	6	30	64	3.27	4	2	7.85	4.91 	10.47
1995	COL	33.7	24	7	1	18	22	1.87	3	1	6.42	4.81 	5.88
Bill James wrote something about him a few years back that said basically, "This guy could be good if spotted well. He gets lefties out, and his peripheral stats are good, but he has a tendency to give up the long ball." Was Bill right? Well, Bill's been right about a lot of things, but in 1995, Ruffin faced roughly three times as many righties as lefties, and mowed through everybody. Gave up one home run all season while pitching in Coors. As Harry Caray would say, Bruce, "And a big Cubs welcome to Bill Pezesnik, who plays a great game of golf." Does anyone else notice that Harry Caray and Larry "Bud" Melman are looking more and more alike?

BRET SABERHAGEN	1964	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	KCR	194.3	164	61	12	42	154	2.83	15	7	7.60	1.95 	7.13
1992	NYM	97.3	83	35	8	29	89	3.24	7	4	7.67	2.68 	8.23
1993	NYM	138.0	131	49	13	20	98	3.20	9	6	8.54	1.30 	6.39
1994	NYM	176.3	170	51	13	15	147	2.60	14	6	8.68	.77 	7.50
1995	COL	42.7	55	24	7	13	28	5.06	2	3	11.60	2.74 	5.91
1995	NYM	109.3	108	40	14	21	70	3.29	7	5	8.89	1.73 	5.76
The even/odd thing is finally past, and has turned into a wounded/healthy thing, like it is for every other pitcher on the planet. No pitcher escapes the Mets system alive. "You want out of this game? Whazza matter, wussyboy? Too hot for you on the mound? Those 192 pitches make your widdle arm all sore?" – Dallas Green. "Anyone got some Ben-Gay?" – Bret Saberhagen/Bill Pulsipher. Saberhagen will continue to be effective when healthy, and those times will be fewer and farther between. Needs two more big seasons to go into the Hall of Fame, preferably one ending in a World Series win. Underrated.

A.J. SAGER	1965	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	WIC	61.0	78	37	9	13	26	5.46	2	5	11.51	1.92 	3.84
1991	LVG	103.3	116	48	8	16	57	4.18	5	6	10.10	1.39 	4.96
1992	LVG	56.0	86	47	13	14	39	7.55	1	5	13.82	2.25 	6.27
1993	WIC	67.3	79	35	8	21	39	4.68	3	4	10.56	2.81 	5.21
1993	LVG	85.7	83	39	10	18	50	4.10	5	5	8.72	1.89 	5.25
1994	LVG	38.3	50	17	2	8	21	3.99	2	2	11.74	1.88 	4.93
1994	SDP	46.3	61	28	4	16	26	5.44	2	3	11.85	3.11 	5.05
1995	CSP	126.7	150	52	13	23	80	3.69	8	6	10.66	1.63 	5.68
1995	COL	14.3	17	12	2	7	10	7.53	0	2	10.67	4.40 	6.28
I like control pitchers, but I've never seen this guy throw harder than A.J. Simon. I realize that I've been known to bash scouts for making judgments like that, but we're all entitled to our exemptions, little hypocrisies, and embarrassing guilty pleasures. Just ask Clay "Motley Crue" Davenport.

STEVE SHIFFLETT	1966	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	MEM	105.3	121	39	8	19	61	3.33	7	5	10.34	1.62 	5.21
1992	OMA	41.3	35	9	0	16	20	1.96	4	1	7.62	3.48 	4.35
1992	KCR	51.0	58	22	5	17	30	3.88	3	3	10.24	3.00 	5.29
1993	OMA	52.7	84	33	4	16	31	5.64	2	4	14.35	2.73 	5.30
1994	OMA	88.0	104	38	7	25	38	3.89	5	5	10.64	2.56 	3.89
1995	CSP	35.3	58	26	5	13	21	6.62	1	3	14.77	3.31 	5.35
1995	IOW	25.7	34	19	3	7	10	6.66	1	2	11.92	2.45 	3.51

BILL SWIFT	1962	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	SEA	89.0	80	21	3	25	55	2.12	8	2	8.09	2.53 	5.56
1992	SFG	164.7	153	44	8	47	86	2.40	13	5	8.36	2.57 	4.70
1993	SFG	229.3	217	89	22	63	170	3.49	14	11	8.52	2.47 	6.67
1994	SFG	108.7	119	50	10	33	65	4.14	6	6	9.86	2.73 	5.38
1995	COL	104.7	112	46	12	42	65	3.96	6	6	9.63	3.61 	5.59
A good pitcher, and does everything else well also. Great at fielding his position, a good baserunner for a pitcher, and a career .211 hitter. Add that to being a groundball pitcher, and you've got someone worth taking a gamble on. But how much of a load can he handle, and how much money will he cost? With a good defense and a strong bullpen, he's worth a shot. Without those things, I think the risk outweighs the expected upside.

DAVID TELLERS	1968	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1991	SLM	64.7	71	24	4	19	44	3.34	4	3	9.88	2.64 	6.12
1991	CAR	11.7	23	11	2	7	7	8.49	0	1	17.74	5.40 	5.40
1992	SLM	67.0	94	43	13	16	47	5.78	2	5	12.63	2.15 	6.31
1992	CAR	23.7	25	12	4	11	19	4.56	1	2	9.51	4.18 	7.23
1994	NHV	68.3	69	40	14	12	46	5.27	3	5	9.09	1.58 	6.06
1995	NHV	66.0	68	30	6	12	53	4.09	3	4	9.27	1.64 	7.23

MARK THOMPSON	1971	RBP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1992	BND	93.3	118	56	7	35	56	5.40	4	6	11.38	3.38 	5.40
1993	CNV	67.0	52	23	6	12	56	3.09	4	3	6.99	1.61 	7.52
1993	CSP	31.3	28	10	3	11	19	2.87	2	1	8.04	3.16 	5.46
1994	CSP	131.7	150	61	11	58	75	4.17	7	8	10.25	3.96 	5.13
1995	CSP	58.3	69	35	4	26	38	5.40	2	4	10.65	4.01 	5.86
1995	COL	50.7	67	31	7	21	29	5.51	2	4	11.90	3.73 	5.15

JOHN THOMSON	1974	RSP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1994	ASH	81.3	77	38	6	40	51	4.20	4	5	8.52	4.43 	5.64
1994	CNV	45.7	48	21	1	19	30	4.14	2	3	9.46	3.74 	5.91
1995	NHV	122.3	148	69	13	57	69	5.08	5	9	10.89	4.19 	5.08

JAKE VIANO	1974	RRP

YEAR	TEAM	IP	H	ER	HR	BB	SO	ERA	W	L	H/9 	BB/9	K/9
1994	ASH	48.7	41	16	4	29	37	2.96	3	2	7.58	5.36 	6.84
1994	NHV	10.7	9	7	1	9	12	5.91	0	1	7.59	7.59 	10.12
1995	NHV	68.3	57	32	7	39	71	4.21	4	4	7.51	5.14 	9.35
Stop me if you've heard this, but this guy could really be something if he can find his control and stay healthy. This is the last player comment for the Colorado Rockies. For a contrast, go now and read the essay and commentary on a properly-built expansion team, the Florida Marlins. The Rockies need to stop raiding the Cubs front office, and start cloning the brain of Dan Duquette. "Why are you so interested in the back of my neck?" – Dan Duquette.


BP 1996 Info Center | Sample Entries | Baseball Prospectus Home