Biographical

Portrait of Michael Lorenzen

Michael Lorenzen P  

CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Reds Player Cards | Reds Team Audit | Reds Depth Chart

2018 Projections (Rest of Season Projections - seasonal age 26)
IP ERA WHIP SO W L SV WARP
Login or Subscribe today for access to projections!
Birth Date1-4-1992
Height6' 3"
Weight217 lbs
Age26 years, 6 months, 13 days
BatsR
ThrowsR
2014
-2.72015
0.42016
0.62017
0.12018
+proj
WARP Summary

MLB Statistics

Historical (past-seasons) WARP is now based on DRA..
cFIP and DRA are not available on a by-team basis and display as zeroes(0). See TOT line for season totals of these stats.
Multiple stints are are currently shownClick to hide.
YEAR Team Lg G GS IP W L SV H BB SO HR oppTAv PPF H/9 BB/9 HR/9 K/9 GB% BABIP TAv WHIP FIP ERA cFIP DRA DRA- WARP
2015 CIN MLB 27 21 113.3 4 9 0 131 57 83 18 .261 95 10.4 4.5 1.4 6.6 43% .322 .315 1.66 5.42 5.40 128 7.04 164.5 -2.7
2016 CIN MLB 35 0 50.0 2 1 0 41 13 48 5 .271 96 7.4 2.3 0.9 8.6 64% .277 .228 1.08 3.70 2.88 92 4.34 96.1 0.4
2017 CIN MLB 70 0 83.0 8 4 2 78 34 80 9 .270 97 8.5 3.7 1.0 8.7 57% .295 .248 1.35 4.03 4.45 99 4.49 95.6 0.6
2018 CIN MLB 21 0 31.3 1 0 1 26 12 21 0 .264 103 7.5 3.4 0.0 6.0 54% .280 .225 1.21 3.02 2.30 107 5.37 121.3 -0.2
CareerMLB15321277.71514327611623232.266978.93.81.07.551%.302.2711.414.424.311125.75129.9-2.3

Statistics for All Levels

'opp' stats - Quality of opponents faced - have been moved and are available only as OPP_QUAL in the Statistics reports now.
Minor league stats are currently shownClick to hide.
YEAR Team Lg G GS IP W L SV H BB SO HR oppTAv PPF H/9 BB/9 HR/9 K/9 GB% BABIP TAv WHIP FIP ERA cFIP DRA DRA-
2013 DYT A 9 0 8.3 1 0 2 7 2 7 0 .261 112 7.6 2.2 0.0 7.6 57% .304 .176 1.08 2.37 0.00 95 4.16 90.5
2013 BAK A+ 5 0 5.7 0 1 2 6 5 6 1 .278 91 9.5 7.9 1.6 9.5 50% .333 .393 1.94 8.17 6.35 104 5.21 97.3
2013 PEN AA 7 0 6.0 0 0 0 6 6 5 1 .257 98 9.0 9.0 1.5 7.5 47% .312 .319 2.00 6.40 4.50 108 5.23 128.5
2013 CIN Rk 1 1 1.0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 .211 88 9.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 100% .250 .295 1.00 2.00 0.00 97 5.14 98.9
2014 PEN AA 24 24 120.7 4 6 0 112 44 84 9 .257 100 8.4 3.3 0.7 6.3 53% .285 .264 1.29 4.00 3.13 98 3.96 89.6
2015 CIN MLB 27 21 113.3 4 9 0 131 57 83 18 .261 95 10.4 4.5 1.4 6.6 43% .322 .315 1.66 5.42 5.40 128 7.04 164.5
2015 LOU AAA 6 6 43.0 4 2 0 34 8 19 3 .247 100 7.1 1.7 0.6 4.0 49% .231 .195 0.98 3.73 1.88 102 3.66 90.6
2016 CIN MLB 35 0 50.0 2 1 0 41 13 48 5 .271 96 7.4 2.3 0.9 8.6 64% .277 .228 1.08 3.70 2.88 92 4.34 96.1
2016 LOU AAA 4 0 4.0 0 0 1 2 0 7 0 .223 4.5 0.0 0.0 15.8 83% .333 .082 0.50 -0.33 0.00 75 2.50 61.7
2017 CIN MLB 70 0 83.0 8 4 2 78 34 80 9 .270 97 8.5 3.7 1.0 8.7 57% .295 .248 1.35 4.03 4.45 99 4.49 95.6
2018 CIN MLB 21 0 31.3 1 0 1 26 12 21 0 .264 103 7.5 3.4 0.0 6.0 54% .280 .225 1.21 3.02 2.30 107 5.37 121.3
2018 PEN AA 3 0 4.0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 .258 2.2 2.2 0.0 6.8 70% .100 .085 0.50 2.72 0.00 96 3.73 79.4

Plate Discipline

YEAR PITCHES ZONE_RT SWING_RT CONTACT_RT Z_SWING_RT O_SWING_RT Z_CONTACT_RT O_CONTACT_RT SW_STRK_RT
2015 1969 0.4637 0.4637 0.7886 0.6484 0.3040 0.8564 0.6636 0.2114
2016 759 0.4769 0.4545 0.7681 0.5856 0.3350 0.9009 0.5564 0.2319
2017 1372 0.4774 0.4526 0.7536 0.6366 0.2845 0.8681 0.5196 0.2464
2018 489 0.4335 0.4622 0.8319 0.6698 0.3032 0.8662 0.7738 0.1681
Career45890.46680.45870.77940.63680.30320.86830.61460.2206

Injury History  —  No longer being updated

Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET

Date On Date Off Transaction Days Games Side Body Part Injury Severity Surgery Date Reaggravation

Compensation

Year Team Salary
2018 CIN $1,312,500
2017 CIN $555,000
2016 CIN $516,500
2015 CIN $
YearsDescriptionSalary
2 yrPrevious$1,071,500
2018Current$1,312,500
3 yrPvs + Cur$2,384,000
3 yrTotal$2,384,000

 

Service TimeAgentContract Status
2 y 159 d1 year/$1.3125M (2018)

Details
  • 1 year/$1.3125M (2018). Re-signed by Cincinnati 1/12/18 (avoided arbitration).
  • 1 year (2017). Re-signed by Cincinnati 3/17.
  • 1 year/$0.5165M (2016). Re-signed by Cincinnati 3/16.
  • 1 year (2015). Contract selected by Cincinnati 4/29/15.
  • Drafted by Cincinnati 2013 (1s-38) (Cal State-Fullerton). $1.5M signing bonus ($1.4705M slot).

The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.

Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.

Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Platoon

SORT_FIELD PLATOON AVG OBP SLG TAv
10 vs L (Multi) .270 .366 .423 .292
11 vs R (Multi) .255 .322 .430 .264
18 Split (Multi) .015 .044 -.007 .028
19 LgAvg (Multi) .006 .020 .015 .013
30 vs L (2016) .202 .290 .258 .208
31 vs R (2016) .245 .304 .404 .248
38 Split (2016) -.042 -.014 -.146 -.040
39 LgAvg (2016) .003 .018 .013 .012

Definition of multi-year splits

BP Annual Player Comments

The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.

Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.

Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

BP Articles

Click here to see articles tagged with Michael Lorenzen

BP Chats

DateQuestionAnswer
2017-03-13 13:00:00 (link to chat)What are your thoughts on Michael Lorenzen? Is he worth holding onto in a 16 team H2H with only 2 RP slots when I got 3 closers?
(David from Ask Siri)
Depends on how many bench spots you have to work with, but almost certainly not. Even if a couple of your closers fall, and you somehow don't nab their replacements, there'll be as good a chance of another middle reliever stepping up as Lorenzen breaking out this year. (Patrick Dubuque)
2017-03-09 20:00:00 (link to chat)Have you guys ever experimented with pitchers who are coded as starting pitchers by Scoresheet but who will likely serve in relief roles in 2017? I am wondering if guys like David Phelps, Michael Lorenzen and Matt Strahm could be deployed as a sort of tandem fifth starter (with benefits such as switching handedness against a platoon-heavy team and potential lower ERAs). Does Scoresheet force you to start a pitcher with a game started that week if there's one on your roster?
(cgoble from KC)
This is a fun strategy, and something we've done and heard others also advocate. Playing time restrictions get stricter come playoff time, so these guys aren't as likely to be starting playoff games unless they've started real life games, but during the regular season it's a fun trick to pull. In the regular season, the measurement for contribution from starters is just total innings pitched, so guys like the ones you mentioned can start for you and offer some opportunities for good draft value and stronger than expected run prevention in a starting role (since they don't face that challenge in real life). (Ben Murphy, Ian Lefkowitz and Jared Weiss)
2016-06-21 20:00:00 (link to chat)Bought a share of Michael Lorenzen recently in a deep league. What odds would you put on him becoming the Reds closer?
(Jake Cutter from Sweetwater, TX)
Betting on anyone in the Reds bullpen is a good way to drive yourself crazy. Pick a number from 1 to 6, then roll a six-sided dice. If that number comes up, write that number and Lorenzen's name on a piece of paper, wrap it around the dice, and set it on fire. Then go after someone in any other bullpen. Steer clear of Cincinnati's relief core until a clear closer emerges, which might mean waiting until 2017. (Scooter Hotz)
2015-07-02 15:00:00 (link to chat)Hi Doug, could you rate these 5 Ps for future? Any stand out above the others? Joe Ross, Vincent Velasquez, Raisel Iglesias, Matt Wisler, Michael Lorenzen. Thanks!
(ColeWhittier from Pasadena)
Ross is an intriguing pitcher but his pitch selection is mirroring his brother's approach, including a high rate of SL's that simultaneously raises the injury risk and put the onus on his ability to bury the pitch. I really like Velasquez's delivery and the velo is legit. Iglesias is incredibly advanced for his age. Lorenzen has great stuff but was perhaps promoted before the command was honed, whereas Wisler holds the opposite profile of low ceiling but high floor. Long-term, give me Velasquez-Lorenzen-Wisler-Iglesias-Ross, but in the near-term I would go with Velasquez-Wisler-Ross-Iglesias-Lorenzen. Velasquez is above the others, and development will determine how the rest fall into place. (Doug Thorburn)
2015-01-05 15:00:00 (link to chat)Thoughts on Michael Lorenzen heading into next year? Are we doing a disservice by paying attention to his K/9 rather than his raw stuff?
(Kevin from Cincinnati )
I did not get to Pensacola this year unfortunately (it's a 9 hour trip, so it takes some advanced planning), but I do want to touch on this topic, because it's a good one. We can definitely get hung up on minor league stats. You wouldn't know Lorenzen throws 96 by looking at his K/9 rate. That said, I think K/9 is a good stat to look at, as long as its part of a bigger picture. It's a bit of a catch 22. We know Lorenzen has better stuff than that so we're not as worried about a low K rate as we would be with a guy who throws 89 mph. That said, he's already in Double-A, it would be nice to see him miss some bats, right? Not everyone who throws hard misses bats. It's not a given just because there's velocity. Just because she throws hard doesn't mean he's going to miss bats in the majors.

There are also other factors to consider. Did the Reds have him working on something in particular? Gerrit Cole is a good example of this. His minor league strike out totals did not match his stuff, which was as good as anybody's in the minors. Why not? Well for one, the Pirates had him working on his two-seam fastball and getting ground balls. He's still using that pitch a ton in the majors and having success. Could he strike out 9-10 batters a game, probably. But would he be better off?

There are a lot of variables, and they all tell part of the story. That's why you can't just look at the numbers, but you should take them into consideration. (Jeff Moore)
2014-11-24 13:00:00 (link to chat)How many of your NL Central Top 25 do you expect to make it on the top 100 list when BP publishes it? Average would be around 16 or 17 assuming talent is evenly distributed, right?
(Mike from Texas)
I did say I'd throw a top 25 NL Central Prospects list out there during this chat. With the understanding this is a work in progress (Mellen and I are starting to dig in on the framework for the Top 101), this is my own personal ranking of the prospects covered in our NL Central rankings:

1. SS Addison Russell
2. 3B Kris Bryant
3. RHP Robert Stephenson
4. OF Jorge Soler
5. OF Albert Almora
6. OF Stephen Piscotty
7. LHP Marco Gonzales
8. RHP Tyler Glasnow
9. RHP Jameson Taillon
10. OF Jesse Winker
11. OF/1B Josh Bell
12. RHP Alex Reyes
13. C Kyle Schwarber
14. RHP Michael Lorenzen
15. SS Orlando Arcia
16. OF Tyrone Taylor
17. OF Billy McKinney
18. RHP Pierce Johnson
19. SS Gleyber Torres
20. RHP Jack Flaherty
21. OF Yorman Rodriguez
22. C Reese McGuire
23. RHP Nick Howard
24. RHP Devin Williams
25. LHP Rob Kaminsky

I think all of those guys will be in the discussion for the 101, and expect there to be some shuffling in order of course. Definitely more than the average of 16 or 17. (NL Central Top 10s With Nick Faleris)
2014-10-09 15:00:00 (link to chat)Are we wrong to be excited about Michael Lorenzen?
(Mr. Red from Cincinnati)
BP ranked him in the midseason top 50, so I would say we're right here with you. I like him, but don't have him quite that high. For one: what's his out pitch? Two: can he flip a lineup over, and make consistent pitches in the 5th, 6th, 7th innings? I'm not going to hold the latter part against him, nor his struggles down the stretch. He had never thrown more than 40 innings in a season prior to this one. But, the questions are there, and until he answers them, I'm going to be skeptical. (Jordan Gorosh)
2014-06-25 13:00:00 (link to chat)What are your thoughts on Michael Lorenzen? Is he going to stay a starter? One "scouts are saying" said that he could even be better than Stephenson. Is this just hyperbole or is that even 1% possible?
(Norris from Chicago)
That was a real quote from a real scout, so at least someone thinks that that's true, though most of our guys who have seen both seemed to think that it was a little extreme. Still, he's made a complete turnaround this season as far as when it comes to staying as a starter, which has changed his entire profile as a prospect. (Jeff Moore)
2014-06-25 13:00:00 (link to chat)Folow-up to the Michael Lorenzen question... I have heard some people even prefer Ben Lively to Lorenzen. What futures do you see these two?
(LoyalRoyal from Kansas)
Those people aren't watching Lively or Lorenzen in person. I haven't seen either one either, but our guys have and I trust their reports. Lively got off to a great start this year but the stuff isn't dominant. He's a back-end guy. Lorenzen has a number two starter ceiling or could be an impact reliever. Lorenzen is closer to Stephenson than he is to Lively. (Jeff Moore)
2014-06-24 13:00:00 (link to chat)There have been glowing reports and not so glowing on Michael Lorenzen. His strikeouts don't seem to match the natural stuff; also there are reports of a curveball coming along. What have you seen/heard?
(Norris from Chicago)
I've heard some excellent things about Lorenzen. He's new to starting, and was a two way player in college, so the fact he's even having success at the AA level is exciting. I don't believe he has bat missing stuff quite yet, but he's a supreme athlete with some feel for pitching. The profile is more of a mid rotation to good #4 type, but I like him quite a bit. (Jordan Gorosh)
2014-04-29 13:00:00 (link to chat)Wut nu jointz is slammin in ya speakers theez dayz brah?
(Slama Lama from Ding Dong)
I don't know what this question is about but I also got a vote for Michael Lorenzen on that keeper league question. (R.J. Anderson)


BP Roundtables

No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.

 

PITCHf/x Pitcher Profile

A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC