Biographical

Portrait of Tim McCarver

Tim McCarver CCardinals

Cardinals Player Cards | Cardinals Team Audit | Cardinals Depth Chart

Career Summary
Years PA AVG OBP SLG DRC+ WARP
21 6206 .271 .337 .388 106 32.5
Birth Date10-16-1941
Height6' 1"
Weight195 lbs
Age82 years, 6 months, 8 days
BatsL
ThrowsR
WARP Summary

MLB Statistics

YEAR TEAM AGE G PA H 2B 3B HR BB SO HBP SB CS AVG OBP SLG DRC+ DRAA BRR FRAA BWARP
1959 SLN 17 8 26 4 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 .167 .231 .208 68 -0.8 0.5 -0.3 0.1
1960 SLN 18 10 10 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 .200 .200 .200 80 -0.2 0.9 -0.1 0.1
1961 SLN 19 22 68 16 2 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 .239 .239 .343 67 -2.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0
1963 SLN 21 127 443 117 12 7 4 27 43 2 5 2 .289 .333 .383 92 -0.4 -5.1 0.1 1.4
1964 SLN 22 143 515 134 19 3 9 40 44 1 2 0 .288 .343 .400 111 8.9 3.0 -2.9 3.4
1965 SLN 23 113 444 113 17 2 11 31 26 1 5 1 .276 .327 .408 104 4.1 1.4 0.6 2.7
1966 SLN 24 150 586 149 19 13 12 36 38 2 9 6 .274 .319 .424 106 5.3 -3.1 0.9 3.0
1967 SLN 25 138 540 139 26 3 14 54 32 5 8 8 .295 .369 .452 133 21.7 2.8 4.3 5.8
1968 SLN 26 128 467 110 15 6 5 26 31 1 4 3 .253 .295 .350 97 2.0 -0.4 -1.2 2.1
1969 SLN 27 138 576 134 27 3 7 49 26 2 4 9 .260 .323 .365 99 5.3 -2.3 2.4 3.2
1970 PHI 28 44 180 47 11 1 4 14 10 1 2 2 .287 .346 .439 108 3.1 -3.2 -0.3 0.8
1971 PHI 29 134 525 132 20 5 8 43 26 1 5 3 .278 .337 .392 111 10.6 -1.9 -7.1 2.5
1972 MON 30 77 259 60 5 1 5 19 14 1 4 4 .251 .309 .343 102 1.7 -0.1 1.2 1.3
1972 PHI 30 45 173 36 8 0 2 17 15 2 1 2 .237 .318 .329 102 1.2 -1.3 -0.5 0.7
1973 SLN 31 130 382 88 16 4 3 38 31 2 2 0 .266 .339 .366 99 1.7 1.1 -6.3 0.3
1974 BOS 32 11 34 7 1 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 .250 .344 .286 101 0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.2
1974 SLN 32 74 136 23 0 1 0 22 6 3 0 1 .217 .353 .236 101 0.8 -1.0 0.2 0.5
1975 BOS 33 12 22 8 2 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 .381 .409 .571 114 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2
1975 PHI 33 47 73 15 2 0 1 14 7 0 0 0 .254 .397 .339 113 1.5 -1.2 -0.5 0.2
1976 PHI 34 90 194 43 11 2 3 35 14 1 2 1 .277 .409 .432 126 6.3 -0.7 -1.0 1.3
1977 PHI 35 93 205 54 13 2 6 28 11 2 3 5 .320 .410 .527 132 8.8 0.1 -0.8 1.7
1978 PHI 36 90 180 36 9 1 1 28 24 2 2 2 .247 .367 .342 96 -0.2 0.7 -0.2 0.7
1979 PHI 37 79 161 33 5 1 1 19 12 1 2 0 .241 .333 .314 85 -2.4 0.0 -0.4 0.4
1980 PHI 38 6 7 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .200 .333 .400 90 -0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0
Career1909620615012425797548422306149.271.337.38810677.3-9.4-12.032.5

Statistics for All Levels

'opp' stats - Quality of opponents faced - have been moved and are available only as OPP_QUAL in the Statistics reports now.
Minor league stats are currently shown —Click to hide.
YEAR Team Lg LG G PA oppAVG oppOBP oppSLG BABIP BPF BRAA repLVL POS_ADJ DRC+ DRC+ SD FRAA BRR DRAA BWARP
1959 SLN MLB NL 8 26 .269 .343 .419 .174 110 -2.8 0.7 0.4 68 12 -0.3 0.5 -0.8 0.1
1960 SLN MLB NL 10 10 .237 .291 .344 .250 86 -0.7 0.3 0.1 80 13 -0.1 0.9 -0.2 0.1
1961 SLN MLB NL 22 68 .264 .322 .409 .246 104 -3.7 1.9 1.1 67 15 -0.1 -0.2 -2.3 0.0
1963 SLN MLB NL 127 443 .246 .302 .365 .312 105 2.5 11.1 6.7 92 8 0.1 -5.1 -0.4 1.4
1964 SLN MLB NL 143 515 .254 .306 .372 .300 105 6.8 13.2 7.9 111 13 -2.9 3.0 8.9 3.4
1965 SLN MLB NL 113 444 .249 .308 .375 .272 105 2.7 11.2 6.7 104 11 0.6 1.4 4.1 2.7
1966 SLN MLB NL 150 586 .256 .308 .382 .275 98 8.6 14.9 8.9 106 10 0.9 -3.1 5.3 3.0
1967 SLN MLB NL 138 540 .250 .305 .363 .290 99 26.3 13.0 7.7 133 10 4.3 2.8 21.7 5.8
1968 SLN MLB NL 128 467 .243 .296 .343 .261 87 0.6 10.3 6 97 8 -1.2 -0.4 2.0 2.1
1969 SLN MLB NL 138 576 .248 .314 .367 .260 97 3.2 14.8 9 99 7 2.4 -2.3 5.3 3.2
1970 PHI MLB NL 44 180 .251 .323 .380 .287 99 2.3 4.9 3 108 17 -0.3 -3.2 3.1 0.8
1971 PHI MLB NL 134 525 .252 .312 .367 .279 100 10.9 13.0 7.6 111 10 -7.1 -1.9 10.6 2.5
1972 MON MLB NL 77 259 .246 .304 .363 .250 102 -1.1 6.0 2.2 102 12 1.2 -0.1 1.7 1.3
1972 PHI MLB NL 45 173 .245 .308 .353 .248 97 2 4.1 2.4 102 12 -0.5 -1.3 1.2 0.7
1973 SLN MLB NL 130 382 .254 .319 .374 .280 101 3 10.1 -4.2 99 11 -6.3 1.1 1.7 0.3
1974 BOS MLB AL 11 34 .248 .306 .354 .259 114 -0.9 0.9 0.3 101 12 -0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2
1974 SLN MLB NL 74 136 .256 .323 .368 .219 103 -0.7 3.5 0.8 101 12 0.2 -1.0 0.8 0.5
1975 BOS MLB AL 12 22 .256 .321 .387 .444 112 1.5 0.6 0.2 114 14 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2
1975 PHI MLB NL 47 73 .264 .326 .372 .275 104 1.2 1.9 0.5 113 14 -0.5 -1.2 1.5 0.2
1976 PHI MLB NL 90 194 .253 .313 .355 .286 104 9.3 4.9 2.1 126 16 -1.0 -0.7 6.3 1.3
1977 PHI MLB NL 93 205 .262 .325 .400 .304 106 12.3 5.7 2.5 132 12 -0.8 0.1 8.8 1.7
1978 PHI MLB NL 90 180 .251 .311 .366 .280 104 1.7 4.7 1.6 96 15 -0.2 0.7 -0.2 0.7
1979 PHI MLB NL 79 161 .258 .324 .376 .254 104 -5.7 4.5 2 85 14 -0.4 0.0 -2.4 0.4
1980 PHI MLB NL 6 7 .288 .343 .388 .200 99 0.4 0.2 -0.1 90 12 0.0 0.4 -0.1 0.0

Statistics For All Levels

Minor league stats are currently shown —Click to hide.
Year Team lvl LG PA AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG ISO SF SH
1959 SLN MLB NL 26 24 3 4 1 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 0 .167 .231 .208 .042 0 0
1960 SLN MLB NL 10 10 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 .200 .200 .200 .000 0 0
1961 SLN MLB NL 68 67 5 16 2 1 1 23 6 0 5 0 0 .239 .239 .343 .104 0 1
1963 SLN MLB NL 443 405 39 117 12 7 4 155 51 27 43 5 2 .289 .333 .383 .094 4 5
1964 SLN MLB NL 515 465 53 134 19 3 9 186 52 40 44 2 0 .288 .343 .400 .112 4 5
1965 SLN MLB NL 444 409 48 113 17 2 11 167 48 31 26 5 1 .276 .327 .408 .132 3 0
1966 SLN MLB NL 586 543 50 149 19 13 12 230 68 36 38 9 6 .274 .319 .424 .149 5 0
1967 SLN MLB NL 540 471 68 139 26 3 14 213 69 54 32 8 8 .295 .369 .452 .157 6 4
1968 SLN MLB NL 467 434 35 110 15 6 5 152 48 26 31 4 3 .253 .295 .350 .097 4 2
1969 SLN MLB NL 576 515 46 134 27 3 7 188 51 49 26 4 9 .260 .323 .365 .105 6 4
1970 PHI MLB NL 180 164 16 47 11 1 4 72 14 14 10 2 2 .287 .346 .439 .152 0 1
1971 PHI MLB NL 525 474 51 132 20 5 8 186 46 43 26 5 3 .278 .337 .392 .114 4 3
1972 MON MLB NL 259 239 19 60 5 1 5 82 20 19 14 4 4 .251 .309 .343 .092 0 0
1972 PHI MLB NL 173 152 14 36 8 0 2 50 14 17 15 1 2 .237 .318 .329 .092 2 0
1973 SLN MLB NL 382 331 30 88 16 4 3 121 49 38 31 2 0 .266 .339 .366 .100 7 4
1974 SLN MLB NL 136 106 13 23 0 1 0 25 11 22 6 0 1 .217 .353 .236 .019 5 0
1974 BOS MLB AL 34 28 3 7 1 0 0 8 1 4 1 1 0 .250 .344 .286 .036 0 2
1975 BOS MLB AL 22 21 1 8 2 1 0 12 3 1 3 0 0 .381 .409 .571 .190 0 0
1975 PHI MLB NL 73 59 6 15 2 0 1 20 7 14 7 0 0 .254 .397 .339 .085 0 0
1976 PHI MLB NL 194 155 26 43 11 2 3 67 29 35 14 2 1 .277 .409 .432 .155 2 1
1977 PHI MLB NL 205 169 28 54 13 2 6 89 30 28 11 3 5 .320 .410 .527 .207 6 0
1978 PHI MLB NL 180 146 18 36 9 1 1 50 14 28 24 2 2 .247 .367 .342 .096 4 0
1979 PHI MLB NL 161 137 13 33 5 1 1 43 12 19 12 2 0 .241 .333 .314 .073 2 2
1980 PHI MLB NL 7 5 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 .200 .333 .400 .200 0 1

Plate Discipline

YEAR Pits Zone% Swing% Contact% Z-Swing% O-Swing% Z-Contact% O-Contact% SwStr% CSAA

Injury History  —  No longer being updated

Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET

Date On Date Off Transaction Days Games Side Body Part Injury Severity Surgery Date Reaggravation

Compensation

Year Team Salary

 

Service TimeAgentContract Status

Details

2019 Preseason Forecast

Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET

PCT PA R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG DRC+ VORP FRAA WARP
Weighted Mean???????00??.000.000.00000.0?0.0

BP Annual Player Comments

No BP Book Comments have been found for this player.

BP Articles

Click here to see articles tagged with Tim McCarver

BP Chats

DateQuestionAnswer
2015-06-30 19:00:00 (link to chat)Favorite announcer past and present?
(Davin from Da burgh)		Right now it's Vin Scully. I know that's obvious, but his cadence and pacing is poetry. I'll lose my baseball card for this, but when I was a kid and Tim McCarver was covering the Mets in the 80s he was excellent. I learned so much about the game listening to him talk about it. Just his stories about catching Bob Gibson were worth the price of admission. (Mike Gianella)
2013-03-27 20:00:00 (link to chat)Tim McCarver is retiring (after this year, alas). How do we get rid of Joe Buck? Lock him in a room with William Shatner and Newt Gingrich ponderously repeating shopworn chiches until Buck's head explodes?
(one down from one to go)		The mute button. (Bret Sayre)
2011-03-24 13:00:00 (link to chat)Opening day is next Friday in these here parts and there are still a few inches of snow on the ground and the temperature out there is below the freezing point and windy. Wax poetic on the great game and warm my soul, won't you.
(R.A.Wagman from Section 203)		To quote Ernie Harwell quoting some "Solomon" guy:
"For lo, the winter is past, the rain is over and gone;
the flowers appear on the earth;
the time of the singing of birds is come,
and the voice of the turtle is heard in our land."
I hope that helps, even if the "voice of the turtle" turns out to sound alarmingly like Tim McCarver. (Emma Span)
2010-08-12 13:00:00 (link to chat)Re: arbitrarily categorizing it. Baseball has a history. We have line drives and fly balls and popups. The mainstream has to be eased intot hat. It *wouldn't* be categorized for background analysis, but Tim MCCarver is NEVER going to say "Ichiro catches 45% of BIP with a VLA of greater than 13.75%" Similarly the question of categorization of pitches. They are categorized for the media: fastball, cutter, cut fastball, slider, slurve, curve, etc are EXISTING constructs that are used. Yes, the speed and spin and break are all on a continnuum, but no one is going to say "That pitch had 2450 rpms in the plane 5% off perpendicular with a vertical movement of X and a horizontal movement of Y." It's going to be a "curveball". What's the record for most Grand Slams allowed by a pitching staff in a season, and is that really the infamy Jerry Manuel is going for?
(Foghorn Leghorn from Outhouse)		All of those categories are shorthand - they're an abstraction, standing in for reality. Abstractions can be helpful, but they can also keep us from thinking about the reality beneath. In the case of batted balls, ones on the border tend to not be very well served by arbitrary binning. And those are the ones that are the most interesting, I think. (Colin Wyers)
2010-02-18 14:00:00 (link to chat)Your opinion on Will's "be stupider" post?
(ssimon from Pelham, NY)		I think it's really important to understand things and appeal more broadly, and there's nothing wrong with that. It's like my arguements I have about Tim McCarver as an announcer. I understand that he upsets people and I understand why YOU don't want him in the booth. But we are in the minority, we are going to watch the game no matter who is doing it. Tim McCarver is there for the masses, and they love him, and Fox is RIGHT to have him there. Personally, I want to bring the masses up and have them expect more in the end, as opposed to just sitting on my high horse like an elitist and calling everyone stupid. That gets me nowhere. (Kevin Goldstein)
2009-11-02 15:00:00 (link to chat)Best Tim McCarver pre-game "Key" to the game ever: Joe Blanton is "gutty." You can't make this stuff up.
(bowie from Cal)		I'm "gutty," too, but I suspect it's a different definition of the word. (Joe Sheehan)
2009-10-28 14:00:00 (link to chat)Worse hazard to the ears in Game 2: Joe Buck and Tim McCarver, or hearing 50,000 drunk New Yorkers chant "who's your daddy?" over and over for four hours?
(David from Delaware)		Well, there's a finite chance Pedro and the Phillies could win that game, so I'd say Buck and McCarver are the worse hazard. (Jay Jaffe)
2009-08-17 14:00:00 (link to chat)Nice peice on the man behing FOX's baseball production. When Pete Macheska mentioned that they basically let Tim McCarver dictate they're usage of stats during their broadcasts my head nearly exploded. Were you able to keep a straight face when he said that?
(Steve from NJ)		Thanks. Could I keep a straight face? Sure. Pete Macheska (and Tim McCarver, for that matter) are very, very successful at what they do, and while I think I made it clear in the article I don't agree with some of their decisions, or their decision-making process, it's their broadcast -- they have every right to their opinions. Was I -surprised- by that response? At the time, absolutely, but in retrospect I probably shouldn't have been. My takeaway is that the gap between what I believe and what they believe is bigger than I expected it to be. Maybe I'm naive that way. (Ken Funck)
2008-10-24 14:00:00 (link to chat)According to ESPN, Boras is pushing for a longer contract for Manny. How many years do you think he'll get? Where? And why does Tim McCarver get so worked up about Manny, yet he doesn't seem to be bothered by Brett Myers's penchant for wife-beating?
(Nick Stone from New York, NY)		Hey Nick! Thanks for dropping by. Realistically, I don't see Manny getting four (or more) years anywhere, though I think somebody could flatter him via a three-year deal that approaches A-Rod's average annual value. While I think the Dodgers are players for him, I see the Mets as potential suitors, but my sleeper pick is the Phillies given the Charlie Manuel connection (managed him in the minors in 1993, and again in 1999, serving as the Indians' hitting coach in between), Burrell's free agency, the ballpark, the fact that they're a winning team right now.

As for the McCarver thing, yeah it really is galling to hear him and Buck slobbering over Brett Myers without at least acknowledging his off-the-field woes, even if they are (hopefully) behind him. The guy is no mensch, and there's zero excuse for riding a high horse regarding what Manny is alleged to have done while ignoring something that's considerably more serious. (Jay Jaffe)
2008-10-09 14:00:00 (link to chat)Being french and a soccer fan, I can't understand why there is playoffs at the end of the regular season, isn't it enough to play 162 games to determine which team is the best? I understand that win or die formats are fun but in this case you could have another competition with a tournament format.
(Daniel from Paris)		French AND a soccer fan? My God, man, you've got two strikes against you already... But I'm kidding. Seriously, I'm flattered that someone half a world away is taking an interest in baseball and BP.

We here in America tend to like playoffs, whether you're talking about a one-game winner-take-all like the Super Bowl or a best-of-seven like the World Series, because they create a spectacle that captures a much larger audience than in the regular season. For baseball, the tradition of doing so goes back over a century, and baseball loves none of its traditions as much as the World Series. Of course, that would be more obvious if Fox weren't subjecting us to the factually challenged, obnoxious team of Tim McCarver and Joe Buck to narrate that spectacle every year.

As for "another competition with a tournament format," well, the World Baseball Classic is trying to accomplish that but facing problems of buy-ins because of the timing and the fragility of pitchers' arms. The WBC was a fun exhibition last time around, but it didn't settle anything because many of the top players from the various countries didn't particiapte. (Jay Jaffe)
2008-05-01 13:00:00 (link to chat)Got a sabermetrics 101 sort of question: Ellsbury's probably never going to be an incredibly productive hitter. I can't imagine (nor does he project) .330/20 hr years ahead. That said, and not to get all Tim McCarver, the kid seems to "make stuff happen" when he's on the basepaths. He's not just stealing bases, he's freaking pitchers out, he's forcing bad throws. Is there a stat/metric that will help me understand the objective impact of that as opposed to the lazy-color-guy version of it?
(jeff from sacramento)		Every study that's ever been done shows that the saw about a guy on first base distracting a pitcher is garbage. Players hit MUCH worse in ABs with a stolen-base attempt than they do otherwise, and the rest of the value in having a guy on first is in the first baseman holding and creating a hole, and that happens with 95% of baserunners. Once again, I say: baseball players are much, much more mentally tough, as a group, than they're given credit for, You can't shake a major-league pitcher by taking a big lead. (Joe Sheehan)


BP Roundtables

DateRoundtable NameComment
2009-11-02 17:00:002009 WS Game FiveDoes Buck's new show include him singing the classics with Tim McCarver? (Steph Bee)
2009-10-28 17:00:002009 WS Game One"Just not carrying."

"It's a wind tunnel."

Tim McCarver, ladies and gentlemen. (Will Carroll)
2009-10-16 13:00:00NLCS Game Two/ALCS Game OneAnd Tim McCarver gets his first "I told you so" regarding Jeter hitting to right field with two strikes. (Jay Jaffe)
2008-10-22 16:30:00World Series Game OneThe horror is that Buck really is the best of the nepotistas in the booth. To borrow a line from Bernie Lincicome, that's like determining the shortest midget in the circus, but it's always a wonder to me, that national networks wind up employing "national announcers" who frequently know a lot less about the teams than their fans. I'd rather see the team's booth voices rotated in (one announcer, both teams' color men), and skip the corporate delusion that America welcomes Tim McCarver into their homes. (Christina Kahrl)
2008-10-13 17:00:00NLCS Game FourHelpful advice from a reader:

"bmcgehee (NashVegas, TN): More of a public service announcement. If you abhor Tim McCarver and want to hear the Scully broadcast, it's at wnsr.com" (Jay Jaffe)
2008-10-10 13:30:00Friday LCS"Steve (ND): The fact that Joe Buck and Tim McCarver are doing the NLCS is ____% of the reason why you're doing the roundtable for the ALCS."

Zero percent.

I know there's a small group who love to know how the sausage gets made, so for those of you...we found that if we try and do more than one game, it's hard to staff it and keep the comments coming. So we'll stick to one at a time, and today, more people were available for the later game.

We're years from some kind of "alternate audio," largely because media companies pay hundreds of millions of dollars for exclusivity. But that so many of you ask is flattering.
(Joe Sheehan)
2008-10-10 13:30:00Friday LCS"Steve (ND): The fact that Joe Buck and Tim McCarver are doing the NLCS is ____% of the reason why you're doing the roundtable for the ALCS."

Buck/McCarver in the postseason is both unavoidable and poisonous. In order to last out the World Series, you have to keep the dosage low, early. (Derek Jacques)
2008-09-30 16:30:00Twins/White Sox Play-In Game"Josh (Sacramento): Mauer and Morneau are now both 0 for 3. Which one is Buster Olney more likely to write needs to see a sports psychologist tomorrow?"

Mauer, obviously. All I can hope is that it gets him in a fistfight with Tim McCarver over his anti-catcher bias. (Derek Jacques)

Advanced Catching Metrics

Year lvl CSAA Framing Runs Blocking Chances EPAA Blocking Runs SB Attempts SRAA TRAA Throwing Runs FRAA Adj. FRAA
1959 mlb .000 0.0 246 .002 -0.1 2 .046 .001 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3
1960 mlb .000 0.0 86 .000 0.0 3 .039 .000 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1
1961 mlb .000 0.0 678 .000 0.0 12 -.011 .002 0.1 0.1 -0.1
1963 mlb .000 0.0 4432 .000 -0.2 66 -.010 .000 0.4 0.1 0.1
1964 mlb .000 0.0 4960 .000 0.0 57 .045 -.003 -0.8 -0.8 -2.9
1965 mlb .000 0.0 4211 .000 0.0 58 .009 -.002 0.0 -0.1 0.6
1966 mlb .000 0.0 5385 -.001 0.6 79 .003 .000 -0.1 0.4 0.9
1967 mlb .000 0.0 4819 -.001 1.8 59 -.073 -.002 3.1 4.9 4.3
1968 mlb .000 0.0 3975 .000 0.3 56 .029 -.002 -0.7 -0.3 -1.2
1969 mlb .000 0.0 5390 .000 0.1 88 .041 .000 -2.0 -1.9 2.4
1970 mlb .000 0.0 1851 -.001 0.4 39 .087 -.003 -1.8 -1.4 -0.3
1971 mlb .000 0.0 4781 .001 -1.1 120 .066 .009 -4.3 -5.4 -7.1
1972 mlb .000 0.0 3084 .000 -0.3 58 .020 .004 -0.7 -1.0 0.6
1973 mlb .000 0.0 436 .000 0.0 12 .016 .001 -0.1 -0.1 -6.3
1974 mlb .000 0.0 939 .000 0.0 32 .008 .014 -0.2 -0.2 0.2
1975 mlb .000 0.0 558 .000 0.1 14 .030 .002 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4
1976 mlb .000 0.0 1324 .000 0.1 35 .038 .004 -0.8 -0.8 -1.0
1977 mlb .000 0.0 1356 .000 0.2 44 .013 .010 -0.4 -0.2 -0.8
1978 mlb .000 0.0 1055 .000 0.1 27 -.032 .003 0.5 0.6 -0.2
1979 mlb .000 0.0 1095 .000 0.1 25 -.005 .005 0.1 0.1 -0.4

A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC