Hal Chase 1BYankeesYankees Player Cards | Yankees Team Audit | Yankees Depth Chart |
Years | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | DRC+ | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 7939 | .291 | .319 | .391 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
|
YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | PA | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | DRC+ | DRAA | BRR | FRAA | BWARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1905 | NYA | 22 | 128 | 501 | 116 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 3 | 22 | .249 | .277 | .329 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1906 | NYA | 23 | 151 | 637 | 193 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 48 | 3 | 28 | .323 | .341 | .395 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1907 | NYA | 24 | 125 | 528 | 143 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 39 | 1 | 32 | .287 | .315 | .357 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1908 | NYA | 25 | 106 | 430 | 104 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 34 | 1 | 27 | .257 | .285 | .306 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1909 | NYA | 26 | 118 | 513 | 134 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 50 | 4 | 25 | .283 | .317 | .357 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1910 | NYA | 27 | 130 | 560 | 152 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 41 | 1 | 40 | .290 | .312 | .365 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1911 | NYA | 28 | 133 | 571 | 166 | 32 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 40 | 1 | 36 | .315 | .342 | .419 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1912 | NYA | 29 | 131 | 566 | 143 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 2 | 33 | 22 | .274 | .299 | .372 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1913 | CHA | 30 | 102 | 414 | 110 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 16 | 41 | 3 | 9 | .286 | .320 | .383 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1913 | NYA | 30 | 39 | 160 | 31 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 5 | .212 | .268 | .281 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1914 | BUF | 31 | 75 | 304 | 101 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 31 | 2 | 10 | .347 | .365 | .505 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1914 | CHA | 31 | 58 | 236 | 55 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 23 | 19 | 1 | 9 | 4 | .267 | .343 | .364 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1915 | BUF | 32 | 145 | 596 | 165 | 31 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 50 | 1 | 23 | .291 | .316 | .471 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1916 | CIN | 33 | 142 | 571 | 184 | 29 | 12 | 4 | 19 | 48 | 1 | 22 | 11 | .339 | .363 | .459 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1917 | CIN | 34 | 152 | 628 | 167 | 28 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 49 | 1 | 21 | .277 | .296 | .394 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1918 | CIN | 35 | 74 | 281 | 78 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 2 | 5 | .301 | .339 | .417 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
1919 | NY1 | 36 | 110 | 443 | 116 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 17 | 40 | 3 | 16 | .284 | .318 | .397 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Career | 1919 | 7939 | 2158 | 322 | 124 | 57 | 276 | 660 | 30 | 363 | 37 | .291 | .319 | .391 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
YEAR | Team | Lg | LG | G | PA | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | BABIP | BPF | BRAA | repLVL | POS_ADJ | DRC+ | DRC+ SD | FRAA | BRR | DRAA | BWARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1905 | NYA | MLB | AL | 128 | 501 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1906 | NYA | MLB | AL | 151 | 637 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1907 | NYA | MLB | AL | 125 | 528 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1908 | NYA | MLB | AL | 106 | 430 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1909 | NYA | MLB | AL | 118 | 513 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1910 | NYA | MLB | AL | 130 | 560 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1911 | NYA | MLB | AL | 133 | 571 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1912 | NYA | MLB | AL | 131 | 566 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1913 | CHA | MLB | AL | 102 | 414 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1913 | NYA | MLB | AL | 39 | 160 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1914 | BUF | MLB | FL | 75 | 304 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1914 | CHA | MLB | AL | 58 | 236 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1915 | BUF | MLB | FL | 145 | 596 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1916 | CIN | MLB | NL | 142 | 571 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1917 | CIN | MLB | NL | 152 | 628 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1918 | CIN | MLB | NL | 74 | 281 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
1919 | NY1 | MLB | NL | 110 | 443 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Year | Team | lvl | LG | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | TB | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | SF | SH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1905 | NYA | MLB | AL | 501 | 465 | 60 | 116 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 153 | 49 | 15 | 62 | 22 | .249 | .277 | .329 | .080 | 18 | ||
1906 | NYA | MLB | AL | 637 | 597 | 84 | 193 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 236 | 76 | 13 | 48 | 28 | .323 | .341 | .395 | .072 | 24 | ||
1907 | NYA | MLB | AL | 528 | 498 | 72 | 143 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 178 | 68 | 19 | 39 | 32 | .287 | .315 | .357 | .070 | 10 | ||
1908 | NYA | MLB | AL | 430 | 405 | 50 | 104 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 124 | 36 | 15 | 34 | 27 | .257 | .285 | .306 | .049 | 9 | ||
1909 | NYA | MLB | AL | 513 | 474 | 60 | 134 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 169 | 63 | 20 | 50 | 25 | .283 | .317 | .357 | .074 | 15 | ||
1910 | NYA | MLB | AL | 560 | 524 | 67 | 152 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 191 | 73 | 16 | 41 | 40 | .290 | .312 | .365 | .074 | 19 | ||
1911 | NYA | MLB | AL | 571 | 527 | 82 | 166 | 32 | 7 | 3 | 221 | 62 | 21 | 40 | 36 | .315 | .342 | .419 | .104 | 22 | ||
1912 | NYA | MLB | AL | 566 | 522 | 61 | 143 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 194 | 58 | 17 | 40 | 33 | 22 | .274 | .299 | .372 | .098 | 25 | |
1913 | NYA | MLB | AL | 160 | 146 | 15 | 31 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 41 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 5 | .212 | .268 | .281 | .068 | 3 | ||
1913 | CHA | MLB | AL | 414 | 384 | 49 | 110 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 147 | 39 | 16 | 41 | 9 | .286 | .320 | .383 | .096 | 11 | ||
1914 | BUF | MLB | FL | 304 | 291 | 43 | 101 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 147 | 48 | 6 | 31 | 10 | .347 | .365 | .505 | .158 | 5 | ||
1914 | CHA | MLB | AL | 236 | 206 | 27 | 55 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 75 | 20 | 23 | 19 | 9 | 4 | .267 | .343 | .364 | .097 | 6 | |
1915 | BUF | MLB | FL | 596 | 567 | 85 | 165 | 31 | 10 | 17 | 267 | 89 | 20 | 50 | 23 | .291 | .316 | .471 | .180 | 8 | ||
1916 | CIN | MLB | NL | 571 | 542 | 66 | 184 | 29 | 12 | 4 | 249 | 82 | 19 | 48 | 22 | 11 | .339 | .363 | .459 | .120 | 9 | |
1917 | CIN | MLB | NL | 628 | 602 | 71 | 167 | 28 | 15 | 4 | 237 | 86 | 15 | 49 | 21 | .277 | .296 | .394 | .116 | 10 | ||
1918 | CIN | MLB | NL | 281 | 259 | 30 | 78 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 108 | 38 | 13 | 15 | 5 | .301 | .339 | .417 | .116 | 7 | ||
1919 | NY1 | MLB | NL | 443 | 408 | 58 | 116 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 162 | 45 | 17 | 40 | 16 | .284 | .318 | .397 | .113 | 15 |
YEAR | Pits | Zone% | Swing% | Contact% | Z-Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Contact% | O-Contact% | SwStr% | CSAA |
---|
Injury History — No longer being updated | Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET |
Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
---|
Compensation
|
|
2019 Preseason Forecast | Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET |
PCT | PA | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | DRC+ | VORP | FRAA | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted Mean | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 0 | 0 | ? | ? | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0.0 | ? | 0.0 |
Date | Question | Answer |
---|---|---|
2009-08-13 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Zimmerman finally seems to be getting it so who's better over the long run Evan Longoria or Ryan Zimmerman? (Marcus from Silver Spring) | I think they're very different players,and before we conclude that Zimmerman has taken a step forward, I want to see if he's really going to hold on or if this is another of his hot streaks that has fooled us before. Given Longoria's advantage in age and greater power potential, I think it more likely that he'll pop 40 HRs and take 80 BBs at some point. I still don't know if Zim is going to get there... Putting aside the fact that he was associated with Hal Chase, who has had the highest peak value among the Zimmermans - Heinie or Ryan (Bob Dylan is not a valid answer)? (Steven Goldman) |
2009-08-13 13:00:00 (link to chat) | If Hal Chase were to play today would he be as celebrated for his defense at first base? Has the first base position changed a lot from the times of Hal Chase? It feels strange to read so much praise for a first baseman's defensive play. I'm probaly just bitter I couldn't find a publisher for my poem about Derrek Lee. Also, have you read the article about Ernie Lombardi in The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract? One of the best articles I have ever read. (Bonds Fan from Bay Area) | And with that mention of Hal Chase... Yes, the position has changed very dramatically in that the bunt is something that you have to worry about only rarely (in the AL) or a few times a game (in the NL). In Chase's day, the bunt was a possibility on every play, so the mobility of the first baseman was much more important. Keith Hernandez was deservedly celebrated for his defense in his day, as was Don Mattingly, and Doug Mientkiewicz has squeezed a few extra years out of his career out of being a gloveman, and I suppose Tony Muser could always get another job, so there's probably still room for a defensive star at the position... I have read the Lombardi essay, which was carried over from the original version of the book. I would love to know what Lom's line drive rates were. (Steven Goldman) |
Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
---|---|---|
2010-04-05 09:30:00 | Season Opener Roundtable | It seems like a non-sequitur, but John McGraw would have taken Dukes. He lived to try to get value out of players who had personality problems. Sometimes this worked out really well (Turkey Mike Donlin) other times no so much (Hal Chase) and the practice helped kill him at 60, but this was of great value to the Giants over the years. I don't know if there is a manager who has the same desire and ability that McGraw had to play with fire that way, but if there is such a man he could have a similar impact... Dukes may be beyond that kind of intervention, even if McGraw were alive today, but there's no way to know until you try. (Steven Goldman) |
BP Annual Player Comments
No BP Book Comments have been found for this player.