Dennis Eckersley PAthleticsAthletics Player Cards | Athletics Team Audit | Athletics Depth Chart |
Years | G | IP | W | L | SV | ERA | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 1071 | 3285.7 | 197 | 171 | 390 | 3.50 | 60.4 |
|
|
YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1975 | CLE | MLB | 34 | 24 | 186.7 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 147 | 90 | 152 | 16 | 100 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 7.3 | 0% | .248 | 1.27 | 3.59 | 2.60 | 106 | 3.29 | 77.8 | 3.4 |
1976 | CLE | MLB | 36 | 30 | 199.3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 155 | 78 | 200 | 13 | 97 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 0% | .270 | 1.17 | 2.70 | 3.43 | 75 | 2.19 | 54.8 | 5.8 |
1977 | CLE | MLB | 33 | 33 | 247.3 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 214 | 54 | 191 | 31 | 101 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 7.0 | 0% | .253 | 1.08 | 3.55 | 3.53 | 90 | 2.72 | 60.7 | 6.9 |
1978 | BOS | MLB | 35 | 35 | 268.3 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 258 | 71 | 162 | 30 | 109 | 8.7 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 0% | .268 | 1.23 | 3.66 | 2.99 | 100 | 3.42 | 82.5 | 4.3 |
1979 | BOS | MLB | 33 | 33 | 246.7 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 234 | 59 | 150 | 29 | 109 | 8.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 0% | .265 | 1.19 | 3.86 | 2.99 | 101 | 4.08 | 90.7 | 3.0 |
1980 | BOS | MLB | 30 | 30 | 197.7 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 188 | 44 | 121 | 25 | 104 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 0% | .260 | 1.17 | 3.87 | 4.28 | 103 | 3.89 | 90.6 | 2.5 |
1981 | BOS | MLB | 23 | 23 | 154.0 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 160 | 35 | 79 | 9 | 105 | 9.4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 0% | .289 | 1.27 | 3.01 | 4.27 | 100 | 3.64 | 91.1 | 2.0 |
1982 | BOS | MLB | 33 | 33 | 224.3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 228 | 43 | 127 | 31 | 109 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 0% | .272 | 1.21 | 3.95 | 3.73 | 103 | 4.35 | 101.0 | 1.9 |
1983 | BOS | MLB | 28 | 28 | 176.3 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 223 | 39 | 77 | 27 | 109 | 11.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 0% | .307 | 1.49 | 4.69 | 5.61 | 117 | 6.40 | 147.8 | -2.7 |
1984 | BOS | 0 | 9 | 9 | 64.7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 71 | 13 | 33 | 10 | 103 | 9.9 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 4.6 | 0% | .286 | 1.30 | 4.38 | 5.01 | 112 | 4.51 | 105.4 | 0.4 |
1984 | CHN | 0 | 24 | 24 | 160.3 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 152 | 36 | 81 | 11 | 103 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 4.5 | 0% | .266 | 1.17 | 3.42 | 3.03 | 100 | 4.27 | 99.7 | 1.5 |
1985 | CHN | MLB | 25 | 25 | 169.3 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 145 | 19 | 117 | 15 | 103 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 6.2 | 0% | .255 | 0.97 | 2.77 | 3.08 | 83 | 2.90 | 66.5 | 4.7 |
1986 | CHN | MLB | 33 | 32 | 201.0 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 226 | 43 | 137 | 21 | 105 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 6.1 | 0% | .312 | 1.34 | 3.42 | 4.57 | 88 | 3.83 | 86.5 | 3.6 |
1987 | OAK | MLB | 54 | 2 | 115.7 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 99 | 17 | 113 | 11 | 95 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 8.8 | 0% | .278 | 1.00 | 2.66 | 3.03 | 67 | 2.58 | 54.1 | 3.6 |
1988 | OAK | MLB | 60 | 0 | 72.7 | 4 | 2 | 45 | 52 | 11 | 70 | 5 | 95 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 8.7 | 0% | .245 | 0.87 | 2.28 | 2.35 | 65 | 2.04 | 49.0 | 2.4 |
1989 | OAK | MLB | 51 | 0 | 57.7 | 4 | 0 | 33 | 32 | 3 | 55 | 5 | 94 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 8.6 | 0% | .190 | 0.61 | 2.27 | 1.56 | 65 | 2.15 | 51.8 | 1.8 |
1990 | OAK | MLB | 63 | 0 | 73.3 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 41 | 4 | 73 | 2 | 94 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 9.0 | 0% | .213 | 0.61 | 1.32 | 0.61 | 55 | 1.93 | 45.1 | 2.6 |
1991 | OAK | MLB | 67 | 0 | 76.0 | 5 | 4 | 43 | 60 | 9 | 87 | 11 | 97 | 7.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 10.3 | 0% | .257 | 0.91 | 2.89 | 2.96 | 65 | 2.11 | 48.7 | 2.5 |
1992 | OAK | MLB | 69 | 0 | 80.0 | 7 | 1 | 51 | 62 | 11 | 93 | 5 | 97 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 0% | .286 | 0.91 | 1.72 | 1.91 | 55 | 1.82 | 44.1 | 2.9 |
1993 | OAK | MLB | 64 | 0 | 67.0 | 2 | 4 | 36 | 67 | 13 | 80 | 7 | 96 | 9.0 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 10.7 | 0% | .345 | 1.19 | 2.63 | 4.16 | 60 | 2.20 | 47.5 | 2.3 |
1994 | OAK | MLB | 45 | 0 | 44.3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 49 | 13 | 47 | 5 | 94 | 9.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 0% | .346 | 1.40 | 3.48 | 4.26 | 82 | 3.00 | 60.4 | 1.2 |
1995 | OAK | MLB | 52 | 0 | 50.3 | 4 | 6 | 29 | 53 | 11 | 40 | 5 | 96 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 7.2 | 0% | .310 | 1.27 | 3.55 | 4.83 | 94 | 3.68 | 75.4 | 1.0 |
1996 | SLN | MLB | 63 | 0 | 60.0 | 0 | 6 | 30 | 65 | 6 | 49 | 8 | 97 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 7.4 | 0% | .310 | 1.18 | 3.69 | 3.30 | 85 | 3.12 | 61.7 | 1.6 |
1997 | SLN | MLB | 57 | 0 | 53.0 | 1 | 5 | 36 | 49 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 95 | 8.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 7.6 | 0% | .260 | 1.08 | 4.15 | 3.91 | 91 | 3.81 | 79.3 | 0.9 |
1998 | BOS | MLB | 50 | 0 | 39.7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 8 | 22 | 6 | 102 | 10.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 0% | .301 | 1.36 | 4.83 | 4.76 | 98 | 3.99 | 82.7 | 0.6 |
1984 | TOT | MLB | 33 | 33 | 225.0 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 223 | 49 | 114 | 21 | 103 | 8.9 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 0% | .000 | 1.21 | 3.69 | 3.60 | 104 | 4.34 | 101.4 | 2.0 |
Career | MLB | 1071 | 361 | 3285.7 | 197 | 171 | 390 | 3076 | 738 | 2401 | 347 | 102 | 8.4 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 6.6 | 39% | .274 | 1.16 | 3.39 | 3.50 | 91 | 3.45 | 79.5 | 60.4 |
YEAR | Team | Lg | LG | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1975 | CLE | MLB | AL | 34 | 24 | 186.7 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 147 | 90 | 152 | 16 | 100 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 7.3 | 0% | .248 | 1.27 | 3.59 | 2.60 | 106 | 3.29 | 77.8 |
1976 | CLE | MLB | AL | 36 | 30 | 199.3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 155 | 78 | 200 | 13 | 97 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 0% | .270 | 1.17 | 2.70 | 3.43 | 75 | 2.19 | 54.8 |
1977 | CLE | MLB | AL | 33 | 33 | 247.3 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 214 | 54 | 191 | 31 | 101 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 7.0 | 0% | .253 | 1.08 | 3.55 | 3.53 | 90 | 2.72 | 60.7 |
1978 | BOS | MLB | AL | 35 | 35 | 268.3 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 258 | 71 | 162 | 30 | 109 | 8.7 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 0% | .268 | 1.23 | 3.66 | 2.99 | 100 | 3.42 | 82.5 |
1979 | BOS | MLB | AL | 33 | 33 | 246.7 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 234 | 59 | 150 | 29 | 109 | 8.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 0% | .265 | 1.19 | 3.86 | 2.99 | 101 | 4.08 | 90.7 |
1980 | BOS | MLB | AL | 30 | 30 | 197.7 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 188 | 44 | 121 | 25 | 104 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 0% | .260 | 1.17 | 3.87 | 4.28 | 103 | 3.89 | 90.6 |
1981 | BOS | MLB | AL | 23 | 23 | 154.0 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 160 | 35 | 79 | 9 | 105 | 9.4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 0% | .289 | 1.27 | 3.01 | 4.27 | 100 | 3.64 | 91.1 |
1982 | BOS | MLB | AL | 33 | 33 | 224.3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 228 | 43 | 127 | 31 | 109 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 0% | .272 | 1.21 | 3.95 | 3.73 | 103 | 4.35 | 101.0 |
1983 | BOS | MLB | AL | 28 | 28 | 176.3 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 223 | 39 | 77 | 27 | 109 | 11.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 0% | .307 | 1.49 | 4.69 | 5.61 | 117 | 6.40 | 147.8 |
1984 | BOS | MLB | AL | 9 | 9 | 64.7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 71 | 13 | 33 | 10 | 103 | 9.9 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 4.6 | 0% | .286 | 1.30 | 4.38 | 5.01 | 112 | 4.51 | 105.4 |
1984 | CHN | MLB | NL | 24 | 24 | 160.3 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 152 | 36 | 81 | 11 | 103 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 4.5 | 0% | .266 | 1.17 | 3.42 | 3.03 | 100 | 4.27 | 99.7 |
1985 | CHN | MLB | NL | 25 | 25 | 169.3 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 145 | 19 | 117 | 15 | 103 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 6.2 | 0% | .255 | 0.97 | 2.77 | 3.08 | 83 | 2.90 | 66.5 |
1986 | CHN | MLB | NL | 33 | 32 | 201.0 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 226 | 43 | 137 | 21 | 105 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 6.1 | 0% | .312 | 1.34 | 3.42 | 4.57 | 88 | 3.83 | 86.5 |
1987 | OAK | MLB | AL | 54 | 2 | 115.7 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 99 | 17 | 113 | 11 | 95 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 8.8 | 0% | .278 | 1.00 | 2.66 | 3.03 | 67 | 2.58 | 54.1 |
1988 | OAK | MLB | AL | 60 | 0 | 72.7 | 4 | 2 | 45 | 52 | 11 | 70 | 5 | 95 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 8.7 | 0% | .245 | 0.87 | 2.28 | 2.35 | 65 | 2.04 | 49.0 |
1989 | OAK | MLB | AL | 51 | 0 | 57.7 | 4 | 0 | 33 | 32 | 3 | 55 | 5 | 94 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 8.6 | 0% | .190 | 0.61 | 2.27 | 1.56 | 65 | 2.15 | 51.8 |
1990 | OAK | MLB | AL | 63 | 0 | 73.3 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 41 | 4 | 73 | 2 | 94 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 9.0 | 0% | .213 | 0.61 | 1.32 | 0.61 | 55 | 1.93 | 45.1 |
1991 | OAK | MLB | AL | 67 | 0 | 76.0 | 5 | 4 | 43 | 60 | 9 | 87 | 11 | 97 | 7.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 10.3 | 0% | .257 | 0.91 | 2.89 | 2.96 | 65 | 2.11 | 48.7 |
1992 | OAK | MLB | AL | 69 | 0 | 80.0 | 7 | 1 | 51 | 62 | 11 | 93 | 5 | 97 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 0% | .286 | 0.91 | 1.72 | 1.91 | 55 | 1.82 | 44.1 |
1993 | OAK | MLB | AL | 64 | 0 | 67.0 | 2 | 4 | 36 | 67 | 13 | 80 | 7 | 96 | 9.0 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 10.7 | 0% | .345 | 1.19 | 2.63 | 4.16 | 60 | 2.20 | 47.5 |
1994 | OAK | MLB | AL | 45 | 0 | 44.3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 49 | 13 | 47 | 5 | 94 | 9.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 0% | .346 | 1.40 | 3.48 | 4.26 | 82 | 3.00 | 60.4 |
1995 | OAK | MLB | AL | 52 | 0 | 50.3 | 4 | 6 | 29 | 53 | 11 | 40 | 5 | 96 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 7.2 | 0% | .310 | 1.27 | 3.55 | 4.83 | 94 | 3.68 | 75.4 |
1996 | SLN | MLB | NL | 63 | 0 | 60.0 | 0 | 6 | 30 | 65 | 6 | 49 | 8 | 97 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 7.4 | 0% | .310 | 1.18 | 3.69 | 3.30 | 85 | 3.12 | 61.7 |
1997 | SLN | MLB | NL | 57 | 0 | 53.0 | 1 | 5 | 36 | 49 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 95 | 8.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 7.6 | 0% | .260 | 1.08 | 4.15 | 3.91 | 91 | 3.81 | 79.3 |
1998 | BOS | MLB | AL | 50 | 0 | 39.7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 8 | 22 | 6 | 102 | 10.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 0% | .301 | 1.36 | 4.83 | 4.76 | 98 | 3.99 | 82.7 |
YEAR | Pits | Zone% | Swing% | Contact% | Z-Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Contact% | O-Contact% | SwStr% |
---|
Injury History — No longer being updated | Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET |
Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1998-06-01 | 1998-07-24 | 15-DL | 53 | 47 | Right | Shoulder | Strain | - | - | |
1996-05-19 | 1996-06-13 | 15-DL | 25 | 21 | Right | Elbow | Inflammation | - | - | |
1989-05-28 | 1989-07-13 | 46 | 40 | Right | Shoulder | Strain | - | - | ||
1985-08-03 | 1985-09-07 | 35 | 32 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | Tendonitis | - | - |
Compensation
|
|
2019 Preseason Forecast | Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET |
PCT | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | BABIP | WHIP | ERA | DRA | VORP | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted Mean | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 0.0 | ? | 0 | 0 | ? | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ? | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Rank | Score | Name | Year | Run Average | Trend |
---|
Date | Question | Answer |
---|---|---|
2013-11-25 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Lee Hazlewood: what kind of grade would you hang on him as an entertainer? I would put an 80 on his mustache tool and an 80 on his turtleneck tool, but he doesn't seem to have the ceiling of someone like Prince. Also, can you think of any players comps for him besides a shirtless Dennis Eckersley? (Gerard from Beaverton) | Nobody has the ceiling of Prince, so I wont knock a performer if they fail to achieve those heights. Hazelwood was a solid-average type; gives the smooth, velvety voice and some good songwriting, but he doesn't pack a huge punch. He's a hit tool second baseman. It's a good option but it lacks power. (Jason Parks) |
2013-05-10 14:00:00 (link to chat) | Who was your favorite pitcher to watch growing up? (BobcatBaseball from Athens, OH) | I was partial to the A's growing up, and I especially enjoyed watching the glare of Dave Stewart and the sweeping delivery of Dennis Eckersley.
On the jukebox: Santana & Buddy Miles, "Them Changes" (Doug Thorburn) |
2011-08-17 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Who are your favorite broadcasters to listen to/watch on TV? Let's say top three. (Staufferinthetrunk from San Jose, CA) | 1. Jon Miller
2. Mike Krukow 3. Duane Kuiper and that's not to slight Dave Flemming, the fourth member of the Giants crew. I'm a Giants fan, so that's an easily discounted opinion, but the Giants have had such great broadcasters for the past two decades (Hank Greenwald before them) that I can hardly listen to other broadcasts. Of course, I do listen to other broadcasts, five or six some days, and my favorites outside of those guys are probably Ron Darling (Mets) as a color guy and Len Casper (Cubs) as a play-by-play guy. Among announcers without jobs, I really liked Josh Lewin before the Rangers fired him, and I thought Dennis Eckersley did an tremendous job filling in for Jerry Remy earlier this year. Dennis Eckersley should have a full-time job. The Rangers have the best reporter-in-the-stands guy. The Red Sox have the on-field microphone most likely to pick up profanity. Minnesota has the best center-field camera. The Giants don't use a pitch-tracker, ever, which is obnoxious, but they have a particularly good Coors Light Freeze Cam. The Angels' announcers are the best in a blow-out, because they get silly. The Rays have the best announcing crew if you want to pretend that Mark McGrath is describing a baseball game to you. The Phillies have the most fans who wave at the camera from behind home plate. The Marlins have the lowest production values -- I wish I'd recorded the time that they interviewed John Dewan in the middle of an inning to talk about the Marlins' defense, but it was a phone interview so he had no idea what was going on in the game. It was about unfollowable as a pre-taped call-in talk show. (which is a reference to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrlS9_n8GX4) (Sam Miller) |
2009-05-12 13:00:00 (link to chat) | For the record, I enjoy Wholesome Reading as well...
I think the wife swaping story of Mike Kekich and Fritz Peterson has to be the single biggest "holy crap, that really happened" story that no one knows about. Agree? How many Americans out of 100 have even heard about it? Maybe 5 would be my guess. Can you imagine the hysteria if that happened now? It was (slightly) before my time but do you have any insight about the reaction then? (Mark from Milwaukee) | Thank you on WR, Mark. You guys always inspire me. I don't think anyone handled Kekich and Peterson was handled particularly well, the Yankees reaction being to get rid of Kekich. What I'm not clear on is why they felt obligated to tell the public. Seems to me the same thing could have happened and no one needed to have talked about it. There have been similarly complicated stories in baseball (the breakup of Dennis Eckersley's marriage, for example) that didn't become public scandals... I've always thought that the Peterson/Kekich story might make for an interesting film. (Steven Goldman) |
2008-03-03 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Speaking of the Cardinals, do you think Chris Perez can cut down his walks and become the closer of the future? (Trey from San Fran) | I don't think he's ever going to become Dennis Eckersley or anything, and he'll likely drive Cardinals fans insane a few times a year, but everything else about him has me believing that he takes over that role for the Cardinals in 2009. (Kevin Goldstein) |
2008-01-10 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Joe! Love the work you do. During class, I just think about baseball (which helps explain my grades last semester). Can you answer this question for me- John Smoltz: Hall of Famer or not? (Jonathan from Springfield, MO) | Yes. A stronger version of Curt Schilling's case, with a little Dennis Eckersley thrown in. (Joe Sheehan) |
Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
---|---|---|
2009-10-16 13:00:00 | NLCS Game Two/ALCS Game One | And back to the well for another one which Steve already touched upon... Toni (Oakland, CA): (not about this game) Jay I've been thinking a lot about the 1989 A's (20 year anniversary of Loma Prieta) and do you see any of the players from that team making the HoF outside of Rickey? Dave Parker maybe? And do you think Mark McGwire ever get in? Well, Dennis Eckersley is already in. Parker - I don't see it. His candidacy is like the canned goods at the Kwik-E-Mart: maybe the official expiration date hasn't been reached yet, but everyone's made up their minds pretty firmly on the subject. McGwire, I think, will eventually be there. It may take 30 years of genetic mutant 80 homer a year guys, and a 20-part Barbara Walters interview, but i think eventually the voters will have enough perspective to tackle the steroids issue with a bit more rationality than they can muster these days. (Jay Jaffe) |
2008-10-02 11:00:00 | Thursday Playoff Games | How cool is it, that more than 30 years after the start off his big league career, that Dennis Eckersley has the same haircut and mustache? (Kevin Goldstein) |
2008-09-30 16:30:00 | Twins/White Sox Play-In Game | Will--I'm watching on TBS using Comcast, and it's just the basic package. Dennis Eckersley's mullet looks incredible in HD. (Marc Normandin) |
BP Annual Player Comments
No BP Book Comments have been found for this player.