Carlos Crawford P |
Years | G | IP | W | L | SV | ERA | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 1 | 3.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.91 | 0.1 |
|
|
YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996 | PHI | MLB | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 97 | 17.2 | 4.9 | 2.5 | 9.8 | 0% | .429 | 2.45 | 6.90 | 4.91 | 84 | 3.80 | 75.0 | 0.1 |
Career | MLB | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 97 | 17.2 | 4.9 | 2.5 | 9.8 | 47% | .429 | 2.45 | 6.90 | 4.91 | 84 | 3.80 | 75.0 | 0.1 |
YEAR | Team | Lg | LG | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | BNC | Rk | APL | 13 | 13 | 80.3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 62 | 14 | 80 | 3 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 9.0 | 0% | .000 | 0.95 | 2.20 | 2.47 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1992 | CGA | A | SAL | 28 | 28 | 188.3 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 167 | 86 | 127 | 7 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 6.1 | 0% | .000 | 1.34 | 3.45 | 2.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1993 | KIN | A+ | CRL | 28 | 28 | 165.0 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 158 | 46 | 124 | 11 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 6.8 | 0% | .000 | 1.24 | 3.34 | 3.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1994 | CAN | AA | EAS | 26 | 25 | 175.0 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 164 | 59 | 99 | 15 | 8.4 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 5.1 | 0% | .000 | 1.27 | 4.17 | 3.45 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1995 | CAN | AA | EAS | 8 | 8 | 51.7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 47 | 15 | 36 | 1 | 8.2 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 6.3 | 0% | .000 | 1.20 | 2.96 | 2.61 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1995 | BUF | AAA | AA | 13 | 3 | 30.3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 36 | 12 | 15 | 2 | 10.7 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 4.5 | 0% | .000 | 1.58 | 4.23 | 5.64 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1996 | PHI | MLB | NL | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 97 | 17.2 | 4.9 | 2.5 | 9.8 | 0% | .429 | 2.45 | 6.90 | 4.91 | 84 | 3.80 | 75.0 |
1996 | SWB | AAA | INT | 28 | 25 | 158.7 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 169 | 63 | 89 | 15 | 9.6 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 0% | .000 | 1.46 | 4.74 | 4.54 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1997 | CAR | AA | SOU | 29 | 3 | 62.3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 62 | 25 | 39 | 4 | 9.0 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 5.6 | 0% | .286 | 1.40 | 4.38 | 4.19 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1997 | CLG | AAA | PCL | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 60 | 19 | 26 | 8 | 10.8 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 0% | .302 | 1.58 | 6.23 | 5.94 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1998 | CAR | AA | SOU | 6 | 0 | 11.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 13.9 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 7.4 | 0% | -1.231 | 1.82 | 3.84 | 6.55 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1998 | NAS | AAA | PCL | 8 | 5 | 27.7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 8.1 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 0% | -.545 | 1.44 | 7.67 | 6.17 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
YEAR | Pits | Zone% | Swing% | Contact% | Z-Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Contact% | O-Contact% | SwStr% |
---|
Injury History — No longer being updated | Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET |
Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
---|
Compensation
|
|
2019 Preseason Forecast | Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET |
PCT | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | BABIP | WHIP | ERA | DRA | VORP | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted Mean | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 0.0 | ? | 0 | 0 | ? | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ? | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Date | Question | Answer |
---|---|---|
2009-02-06 13:00:00 (link to chat) | The Rays massive improvement from '07 to '08 screams 'regression to the mean' for '08. Alternatively, the players ages (and swapping the Floyd for Burrel) screams 'more development ahead'. Which competing force wins out? (Nater1177 from Philly) | I think the latter, as long as they have so many pitching alternatives in front of them. Don't forget that David Price in the rotation should also be an upgrade over Edwin Jackson, Carlos Crawford should have a better year in him, and right field and DH weren't solid areas of production and they've taken steps to upgrade those. The D should also continue to be solid. They did overachieve, and maybe they won't be +5 on their pythagorean again, but they might not need to be. (Steven Goldman) |
No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.