BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
May 11, 2009 Prospectus TodayReport from Camden Yards
I'm a little late getting to my report from Camden Yards. A one-day trip stretched into two, and that second day was dominated by news having nothing to do with the good things about baseball, but rather the latest chapter in the game's book of steroid stories. Even a day spent talking more about HCG than OBP couldn't dampen my enthusiasm for another night at the ballpark, however. Thanks to Ned Rice of the Orioles, I was able to attend a sort-of makeup game after Wednesday night's rain-marred fiasco. The Twins and Orioles got in an official game that night, but they finished it long after I was gone, getting in just a tick over the required five innings for the contest to count. The second night was a much different experience, as the skies mostly cleared, the evening was shirt-sleeves-and-ice-cream pleasant, and the ballgame was an exciting one. As I wrote last week, Camden Yards doesn't have quite the impact today as it would have had back in 1992 when it opened. We've seen many HOK and HOK-inspired parks in its wake, and all of them share similar features. The improvement in the overall experience, as compared to the generation of multi-purpose stadiums that preceded this one, is considerable. Whether you're a fan who only needs baseball at a ballpark to be happy, or one who goes only because his friends have an extra ticket and he has nothing else planned, you can appreciate more space, more food options, nicer views, greater access to information via scoreboards, and all of the other touches that made Camden Yards such a rollicking success. I was a bit surprised to see just how few people shared in the experience. Years of noncompetitive baseball teams appear to have crippled demand for Orioles tickets, even on a night with good weather. Watching more games on TV over the weekend, it seemed that even the presence of the Yankees, who usually bring in the Acela crowd, wasn't enough to fill the place. That's disappointing, because Baltimore is a very good baseball city, and in the mid-'90s, when the Orioles were last successful, there weren't very many better baseball experiences. After a decade in the wilderness, the Orioles are building back to that kind of atmosphere. Some of the reasons for optimism were on display Thursday night, most notably Adam Jones, who was strong in the field on an 0-for-4 night. Jones also had what can be described as a "good strikeout" in the fifth, working Glen Perkins for 10 pitches after starting out 0-2, staying back on a couple of tough pitches along the way and fighting off others. It's early, of course, and Jones' contact rate is unchanged compared to last season, but his results on contact, his walk rate, and his K/BB are all much better, and he's shown the jump in power that sometimes happens at the age of 23. I saw nothing in my trip to push me off of his bandwagon. Jones and Nick Markakis are in Baltimore now, and will be for some time to come. They alone are worth the price of admission. When you look at the Orioles, though, the fact is that most of their championship core hasn't arrived yet. Matt Wieters, already a legend, has yet to make his major league debut. Of the current crop of Orioles starters, only Koji Uehara is likely to be around two years from now. The rotation then-let's say Chris Tillman, Brian Matusz, Jake Arrieta, a newly healthy Troy Patton, and Uehara-is lined up to be one of the best young groups in the game, and that's without mentioning Brandon Erbe or David Hernandez or who the Orioles might take with high picks in the next two drafts. (There's a real need for infielders, especially a long-term solution at shortstop.) The Orioles are now about where the Rangers were two years ago, and while they don't have a Mark Teixeira to trade to accelerate the process-their decision to lock up Brian Roberts' eventual decline cut off that path to adding talent-there's enough here to envision a .500 finish in 2010 and contention in 2011 and beyond. An Orioles team filling Camden Yards and pushing for postseason berths will be a very good thing for baseball; as much fun as it was to watch a game in a nearly empty Camden Yards (and at that, one with a surprising number of Twins backers), I can only imagine what it will be like full and loud. Other notes from the trip:
I don't think of myself as someone who's seen a lot of ballparks, but I counted it up and I'm up to 16 current ones and five defunct ones, plus a scattering of minor league parks and spring-training venues. I have to say that Camden Yards is in the top quartile of experiences, and I look forward to getting back to it soon.
Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus.
|
I agree with Trembley's questionable managerial decisions, but I wonder why it's an either or choice: develop young players or manage a game well. While I'm sure there are occasions when a team playing for the future might leave a young pitcher in to work his way out of a jam more or less often than a team in contention, but it seems like most of the managerial malpractice is so obvious (even when a poor relief choice doesn't blow a game) that GMs should teach their managers some very basic rules of thumb and demand they be followed.
I realize we're talking about people and not robots, but so frequently we see obvious errors that I don't understand how it persists. Though managing human beings, particularly those as complex as major league baseball players, is a different skill from baseball tactics, there is no reason they should be exclusive.