BP Comment Quick Links
March 18, 2016 Notes from the FieldRaising Arizona: Part 2
Jose De Leon, Dodgers, RHP De Leon works from an easily-repeated full windup, breaking his hands over his head and extending well down the mound through his pitches. He has a clean, compact-in-the-back high three-quarters arm-slot, and that’s where his consistent control and extension originate from. In this look, De Leon was 93-94 with his fastball, though it’s a fairly true four-seamer that can ride up into dangerously-hittable quadrants of the strike zone. He’s flashed some 95s, 96s, and even a few 97s in the past, but over a full season he’s likely to sit in the 92-95 range. While De Leon certainly does not have poor velocity, I would still like to see him throw a two-seam fastball more often, if his ability to angle the ball to the lower-third doesn’t take steps forward.
De Leon’s changeup grades out ahead of his slider, possessing a high likelihood of playing as a swing-and-miss pitch given his mid-90s fastball. He showed consistent sell on the pitch in terms of his arm-speed, generating above-average turnover that got swings and misses against both lefties and righties. De Leon has every chance to be the rare right-handed starter operating with a truly plus change. When he’s up in the count and working at his peak velocity, he can make hitters look pretty bad—consistently generating awkward swings, especially against opposite-handed bats. His slider is closer to average: an 82-85 mph offering with solid tilt, but not truly a wipeout pitch. Perhaps most importantly, De Leon has shown consistent ability to keep hitters from jumping on his fastball by throwing both his changeup and slider for strikes. Though some have chastised the Dodgers for not being more aggressive on the starting pitching market this offseason, I think the club held pat in part due to their confidence in young arms like De Leon factoring in to their rotation long-term. I’ll settle on the midpoint—this guy is probably a no. 3 type ceiling on a first-division club—but De Leon’s mix of stuff and polish is impressive. He should debut sometime in 2016.
Sean Manaea, Oakland, LHP Manaea’s delivery is one of trade-offs: it allows him great angle (especially against left-handed bats) and deception, but also is difficult to repeat at times, putting great stress on the hip that has been such a lingering issue. He pitches from a full-windup, breaking his hands over his head through a slow-paced leg lift in which he turns away from the batter. He lands closed and works cross-fire around his front leg, finishing across his body with his backside swinging around fairly hard. All that said, Manaea is a good athlete for his physical 6-foot-5, 220-pound frame, who sticks his landings down the mound through a lower three-quarters arm-slot. It isn’t necessarily a sure-fire delivery, so much as it is one that’s fairly high-maintenance.
In last week’s look, Manaea’s fastball was working in its usual low-to-mid-90s range, jumping on hitters quickly hidden behind a closed front side. He was pretty clearly working under mandates to throw changeups, which makes sense given how early in March it was—not to mention Manaea could use some development of a third pitch. The changeup shows more glove-side action than traditional circle-change movement away from righties, as Manaea’s lower, cross-body arm-slot cuts the pitch. He’s shown a plus slider in the past—a wipeout two-planer in the mid 80s at best—but the few he snapped off in this viewing lacked command, which is more the issue with his breaking ball. The same concerns that gave scouts trepidation in 2013 (control, health) still could be described as the “risk factors” for him moving forward. I have high hopes for Manaea’s future and his ceiling, but there’s certainly more risk here relative to some other top pitching prospects. When Manaea is on, there’s not a level of pro baseball where he’s particularly hittable. When he’s off, it’s usually due to bouts of wildness, and those can still plague him given his deceptive, but complex, mechanics. The determining factor will come down to his ability to land his secondary pitches for strikes, particularly his slider. He’ll need to do that if he wants to keep big-league hitters off his fastball, which can’t survive on velocity alone.
Kenta Maeda, Dodgers, RHP For a delivery comparison, Maeda’s mechanics are very similar to Daisuke Matsuzaka (remember him?). He pitches from a slow-paced full-windup, breaking his hands over his head and legitimately coming to numerous pauses throughout the delivery. The stop-and-start nature of his mechanics give some deception, occasionally speeding his fastball up and jumping it up on hitters. As would be expected from a pitcher with such aforementioned command and control, Maeda finishes down the mound with great extension and balance.
In my look at Maeda, his fastball operated in the low 90s with running life in on right-handed hitters. His most effective secondary offering was a circle-change with above-average turnover. What was most impressive about his change was how well he could land it on the corners, or throw it double up on it with such command that he didn’t pay the price for delivering consecutive mid-80s pitches in zone. There were numerous instances where Maeda successfully made his 91-92 fastball look firmer because of his ability to pitch backwards—only throwing his average fastball after hitters had seen the kitchen sink of secondary offerings earlier in the at-bat. Maeda mixed breaking balls all afternoon: he’ll cast a big, loopy breaking ball in the lower-to-mid 70s with good shape to the lower parts of the strike zone, while also showing a more traditional slider in the low 80s with average tilt. Maeda doesn’t possess the wipeout stuff to profile as an ace for a contending club. That said, I came away feeling adamant that his control and pitchability will allow what otherwise constitutes as back-end starter stuff to play up to reliable middle-rotation contribution.
Aroni Nina, Royals, RHP Nina is a good example of why velocity alone is far from a guarantee of big league contribution. He’s an unusually sinewy, lean 6-foot-4, 165 pounds—and now that he’s in his mid-20s, he no longer qualifies as projectable so much as just skinny and bony. Nina has never had much statistical success because his control is well below-average, and subsequently, he’s had a very slow ascent through the minorsThe Royals have been working with Nina to harness his control and command, as he was working exclusively from a fairly simple stretch-only. Even from the simplest of motions, however, Nina demonstrated continual trouble repeating his delivery. Nina’s arm actually works fluidly and quickly through a release point ranging from high-three-quarters to a true three-quarters. The issue is his extension and timing, as his upper and lower halves don’t often work together and can throw him off-line. Nina is a low-level prospect solely on the strength of his fastball, which sat comfortably between 93-96 and has touched 97 in the past. He threw both a hard, split-like change (85-86) and cutter/slider hybrid (85-90), though the split was by far the better of the two secondary offerings. His cutter lacked action and didn’t achieve two-plane depth. Nina will need the stars to align to bring out his arm-strength in a lower-leverage relief role, but still constitutes as a low-level Royals prospect for the most ardent observers of Kansas City’s system.
Adam McInturff is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @WAdam_McInturff
2 comments have been left for this article.
|
An As beat guy had Manaea 97T. Did you see that on your gun or maybe it's a little hotter down there than most other places? Ha