BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
July 25, 2014 Notes from the FieldWhat's Wrong With Appel
Take a moment to forget about the Brady Aiken mess and think about last year’s first overall selection. Mark Appel was supposed to be on the fast track. You aren’t supposed to struggle if you’re the first overall selection, and the 6-foot-5 right-handed starter with a prototype body had the look of a player who would move quickly, stopping only briefly in Lancaster and Corpus Christi to humble inferior hitters with his mid-to-upper-90s fastball. If you’ve been paying attention to his season, you know this hasn’t exactly gone as planned. What has happened What’s the problem Unfortunately, that just isn’t happening. His fastball often plays soft—hitters are getting a very good look at this pitch for several reasons, the first being his command. Appel has walked only nine batters in 11 total starts, including the one on July 16th. Control isn’t his problem, as he has no issue throwing the ball over the plate and filling up the strike zone. He tends to be very “loose” with his command, meaning that when he tries to hit the low and outside corner to a lefty, the ball leaks over the plate or elevates. While that might work at Stanford with his plus raw stuff, it will does not work in the California League and certainly will not work at the highest level. What might be causing this command issue is the excessive trunk tilt (lean) in his delivery (as seen below). I should warn you: I am not a biomechanist. This is something I noticed and it could help explain his struggles. The first figure shows what excessive trunk lean looks like in a pitcher, and for comparison purposes I took a screen shot of a video shot in early April this season. I tried to the find the video which showed him most square to home plate to make sure the lean was in fact excessive. Photo cred: Crawfish Boxes
Appel has trouble getting the ball to the inside part of the plate to left-handed hitters. In my opinion, there is little doubt this lean in his delivery (which has increased since he left Stanford) is affecting his release point which, in turn, affects his command. “Contralateral trunk tilt,” as it’s referred to in this article, is not uncommon in pitchers and can even increase ball velocity, according to the American Journal of Sports Medicine. There is a strong, positive correlation between ball speed and trunk tilt. But, that study argued, there is risk involved too, and "future study is warranted to determine if this strategy should be encouraged or discouraged." Specifically, trunk tilt puts pitchers at more risk of injury, and "considering the prolonged time loss, we suggest that pitchers should avoid pitching with excessive contraleteral trunk tilt." Could Appel’s delivery be source of his current troubles, and could his current delivery lead to more serious injuries? There obviously is not enough information without a full biomechanical evaluation. Appel’s struggles are not simply explained by his delivery or command. What many other sources have noticed and written about Appel is his lack of pitchability. Appel’s stuff is good; in his July 10th start, Appel’s fastball touched 96 mph a couple times, sitting mostly 91-95. Early in his start, it was 94-96 mph. As the start progressed he seemed to tire, and kept pitching out of jams using mostly his slider and changeup. The fastball velocity dipped, and in his last inning sat only 91-93 mph. Most of the 13 hits off of him that evening were off his fastball, which was flat and up in the zone. He made no adjustment with his tempo throughout the game, keeping the same pace, which made it very easy for the opponent to time. He also made no adjustment with his pitch sequence, going to his fastball every time he was behind in the count, which was often a flat 93 mph get-me-over offering. He rarely attacked. It seemed he was simply going through the motions, and he didn’t show any emotion on the mound or in the dugout once he was removed from the game. While it’s not a requirement to show some fire, when you pitch like you’re scared of the opponent it doesn’t look good.
What comes next? What will it look like if he does right the ship? It has to be a holistic approach taken by the Astros and Appel himself. It needs to start with his stuff; he’s simply not the same pitcher they drafted last season. The fastball that sat 94-97 and touched the high 90s has been inconsistent at best in 2014, and that needs to return. He needs to get healthy, and now. Whether that means shutting him down for a while or moving him to Corpus Christi, I’m sure I don’t know. Next, you work on the mental side of pitching. Watching videos of his starts at Stanford, he seemed in control and confident. He was able to make pitches whenever he needed it. He was able to pump 97 mph up in the zone for strike three whenever he needed to. That has been non-existent in Lancaster. If his stuff comes back and he regains his confidence on the mound, he’s a major leaguer, a damn good one. The ceiling is still there to become a no. 3 starter. If he continues to nibble, the stuff keeps playing down, and the Astros do nothing to help him, then he might not make it out of Triple-A. Based on my own eyewitness accounts, I’m leaning more toward the latter.
Chris Rodriguez is an author of Baseball Prospectus.
|
I dunno. I don't like turning to speculation to conclude that a pitcher's ceiling has dropped after a small nagging-injury-riddled sample in the CAL league.
In the most annoying of ironic coincidences (from the standpoint of a writer), Appel pitched his best start last night against a good offense, hitting 96 in his final fastball (pitch 73), earning 7 K's and 0 BB's.
The Houston Chronicle reports (and as much as we miss Zachary Levine, Evan Drellich was a strong add to balance the inanity of the rest of their sports staff) that the team has been working on Appel's mechanics during his skipped start last week, and that sounds like it had an impact.
It's no secret around here that prospects aren't finished products. Appel is still a prospect, and thus requires development, or else he'd be in the bigs already. He's still got TOR stuff and a history of using it successfully. He was dominant last season in Quad Cities; outside of one stinker start, his ERA was 2.34, and so I don't see reason to pound a nail into his front line ceiling's coffin after fewer than 80 professional innings pitched.
Appel's need for development is no different than with any other prospect - even Kris Bryant currently has a 'needing development' issue: a 67% contact rate this season and 30% whiff/swing rate, which is even worse than Brandon Wood's, George Springer's, and a host of other players who have seen their ceilings questioned because of those issues. Appel's situation is highlighted by his pitiful run prevention counting stats and smaller sample of appearances, which try to give lie to his decent peripherals.
Note that I'm typing this without my Homer Hat on. It's just too soon to draw any conclusions other than that Appel needs more development than national prognosticators predicted.
If it's true they re-worked his mechanics (and that would be a big positive for his makeup as well because I've heard he doesn't want to change anything about his delivery), then I'm curious to see it in action. They've given him A LOT of time off between starts recently, so they're keeping him very fresh. Both positives. Again, I'm not writing him off. I liked the first start I saw. But the second was just so negative, and had so many problems that it was hard to ignore.
Remember, he still hasn't shown he can pitch every 5th day yet... Let's see how he reacts physically and mentally to the challenge.