Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

Welcome to the first installment of Baseball Prospectus’ 2017 bid prices for “standard” Rotisserie-style formats.

In the tables below, you will find my recommended bid limits for AL-only, NL-only, and mixed leagues. For AL and NL-only, the bid limits are designed for 12 teams, $260 budgets per team, 14 hitters, and nine pitchers. For mixed leagues, the bid limits are for 15 teams, $260 budgets per team, 14 hitters, and nine pitchers. The bids are not predictions of what these players will do, but rather suggested prices. While most of what I expect these players to do is based on projected statistics and values, other factors play a role in the bid prices. These factors include:

  • Positional scarcity — Adding a dollar or two for some catchers.
  • Proven stars — Adding a dollar or two for reliability. Mike Trout and Kris Bryant are bumped up slightly, because they provide an elite level of performance.
  • Category bias — Cheating closers and speed guys who do nothing but add to one category.
  • Rookies — Hedging your bets with rookies. Too many fantasy novices have been caught spending $20+ on a crash-and-burn rookie because "that's what the projection said.”
  • Part-timer bias — Not paying full price for someone whose real-life role is limited. A part-timer could very well earn $10-15 in an only format, but even a small slump for a player with 150-200 plate appearances can have a severe impact on his value.

These bids should serve as a starting point for your own auction preferences. If you think $17 for Jose Ramirez is too timid, then by all means push his price up to your preferred ceiling. Just make sure to take money off another player or group of players so that your aggregate bids add up to $3,120 in mono leagues or $3,900 in mixed.

Later this month, I’ll be tweaking these bids every Friday in this space as we get closer to Opening Day. For most players on these lists, the prices you see are the prices I’m sticking with until Auction Day.

The idea behind bid limits is to set a price that is reasonable without being unrealistic in either direction. I’m high on Kevin Kiermaier this year, but if I see enough evidence that his going price is sitting in the mid-teens, I’ll move my bid down modestly. I’ll probably get him in most of my leagues anyway, but I want my bids to have some semblance of reality. It is OK to use bids to show your affinity or dislike for a player, but you don’t want to be in a room of your own, and fool yourself into thinking that you’re buying a juggernaut, when you’re overestimating everyone on your squad.

Below are some commonly asked questions about these bid prices.

Why are these bids different from PECOTA and Baseball Prospectus’ PFM?
The simplest answer to this question is that a projection is different from a bid, for the reasons outlined in the bulleted points above. While the PFM might theoretically be correct that Jarrod Dyson will earn $26.81 in AL-only, going all in on Dyson like this may be hazardous to your fantasy team’s health. For more information on this, please see my supplemental piece today at Baseball Prospectus.

I do a fantasy draft, not an auction. Can I use these bids for my draft?
Yes and no. The hierarchy of the bid limits works well for hitters and pitchers separately, but based on the differences between drafts and auctions if you combine pitcher bids with hitter bids you will find yourself missing out on most of the pitchers on your list. When drafting, I use the bid limits as a guideline for my draft rankings but make adjustments that include ranking hitters and pitchers separately. I tend to use straight rankings during the first 10 rounds of a draft and then begin to rely more on positional rankings and needs from that point forward.

Why is Mike Trout’s bid higher in a mixed league than in AL-only?
In an only league, the available free agents are bench players with very limited value. In mixed leagues, the best free agents are often everyday players who will produce solid statistics for your team. The lowest ranked players for bid in a 15-team mixed league are interchangeable with the best free agents, and many will do significantly better than the weakest fourth of the players purchased. On the other hand, there is no Mike Trout or Mookie Betts waiting in the wings. Thus, the best players in mixed leagues are given higher bid limits.

Many pricing systems significantly reward the superstars. I did this when I started putting these bid limits together in 2013, but have decided to scale back to try and more accurately reflect real world auction conditions. It might be a good idea to spend $50 or more on Trout or Betts, but if your league is more conservative than that, it isn’t useful to have a bid limit on these players that doesn’t accurately reflect your league’s market.

I think your price on Ian Desmond in NL-only is ridiculous. Can I change his bid?
Definitely… and I encourage you to do so.

If you are a beginner to auction formats — or if you simply don’t have the time to prepare for your auction and prefer to use these lists exclusively — I am confident that you can simply bring these lists to your auction and dominate. However, it will serve you better if you take the time to adjust the bids specifically for your league’s conditions. Your league might insist on paying $20-plus for every closer on the board. If this is the case, adjust your bids accordingly. Just make sure to take money off of some other pitchers or hitters so that the dollar values add up to $3,120 for a 12-team league or $3,900 for a 15-team league.

I play in a 6×6 league that uses holds and OPS in addition to the standard 5×5 categories. Will you be providing bids for other formats?

While I would love to provide bid limits for every format imaginable, 5×5 is still the most commonly used format for auction-style leagues so for the moment this is what I am sticking with for our readers. If the game evolves to the point where 6×6 is the norm, I will start providing bids for 6×6 instead. Keep in mind that the Baseball Prospectus’ staff is extremely accommodating to questions and if you do have specific questions about how to apply bid limits to your format, we are always happy to do our best to help.



Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
MikeGianella
3/03
To head the most obvious question off at the pass, David Price's bid is pre-injury. I don't want to make a decision until the second opinion later today. If I had an auction this morning, I'd cut Price's bid in half, at least..
sbnbaseball
3/03
Why.is Trevor Story only $6 in NL only? Also Segura appears on NL list.
JMill925
3/03
I think the NL only values needs an update. It has Jose Fernandez & Jason Hammel listed..
JMill925
3/03
tjryan607
3/03
Are these inadvertently the 2016 bud limits?
Jose Ramirez $4
Nomar Mazara $2
Benintendi $0
rzt101
3/03
Looks like these are 2016 values
Unraveller
3/03
I thought I was taking crazy pills, then I say JF, and realized it's just a 2016 list.
Punchoutpappy
3/03
How do you factor in bench spots and planned fantasy "platoon roles"? RE: Bench spots...Are you simply adding more players to the batter and pitcher spots to reflect their true value based on total number of players? RE: platoon...I asked because George Bissell had floated he likes the idea of adding guys like Steve Pearce (?) and Danny Valencia to play to their platoon strength. Do you adjust the value of those player types according to your planned use of them?
MikeGianella
3/03
I generally add a buck to two to players like this in deeper leagues where I have daily lineup options and remove that money from platoon players on the "good" side of a platoon. Many of these adjustments are already factored in.
sam19041
3/03
Wade Davis is on the Cubs (not AL)
Edwin Diaz?
Eduardo Nunez is on the Giants (not AL)

Are you sure these are 2017?
MikeGianella
3/03
It appears to be fixed now. Please let me know if you see any errors. Sorry for the confusion.
mcquown
3/03
Please pardon the inconvenience of showing 2016 values for a couple hours - that was a technical issue, not Mike's fault at all.
bruce7
3/03
I don't see where you are able to access the tables.
MikeGianella
3/03
If you want to pull them into Excel (or Google doc) you have to cut and paste.
batts40
3/03
Mike is a clear standout in the very crowded field that is fantasy baseball analysis.

Great work as always, I look forward to this every year. They have become essential for me as I prep for my drafts.
Cardboarddream
3/03
no Danny Duffy? 2x Velazquez?
MikeGianella
3/03
Thanks. I'll pass these along.
Thrillage
3/03
Danny Duffy isn't in the mixed league list, Kelvin Herrera is in the AL list twice.
MikeGianella
3/03
Thanks for the heads up. I'll pass along to our technical team.
t0mmyo
3/03
Wooo. Mike you are the best. I have been looking forward to this post. Happy Friday!
dbutcher
3/03
Must be the April 1 post...
Robotey
3/03
Isn't Ryan Zimmerman going to get enough AB's to be worth at least $10?
MikeGianella
3/03
If he's healthy he'll earn it. But I don't want to pay $10 ((or more) to find out
Robotey
3/04
fair enough
Punchoutpappy
3/03
In case anyone is interested, he's a visual of the mixed league value average by position. I cleaned up a bit of the data to remove duplicatives. Some players are identified as Multi-Pos (x). (x) = players position as listed on roster resource.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yrLfTq5NppSy9QhnqLot4Vgb7urMVFhZus2s1ld4L9U/edit?usp=sharing
davinhbrown
3/04
Mike, my thoughts are that NL pitching seems low in general, and in particular some of the starters under $10. There is some safe guys, and guys who had poor 2016's. Even low end closers seemed cheap.

Thoughts on the low-mid and lower starters in NL only?
MikeGianella
3/04
It's less of a commentary on those guys and more on the fact that the top end guys stand well above. The depth in the NL also gives more choices to fantasy owners, which is why I pushed the prices down.

Closers are very marketplace specific. I encourage you to be more aggressive if your league is
Robotey
3/04
Mike -- pardon me if this is a silly question: these numbers are subjective, correct? They're not simply a function of a specific formula, but a synthesis of projections and your opinion, no? Not asking in a smarmy way, just looking for clarity. Thanks
MikeGianella
3/04
This is correct
Robotey
3/05
cheers
johnklein
3/04
What was the hitting/pitching split for these values?
MikeGianella
3/10
It's 69/31
johnklein
3/04
Straily's listed twice in the NL only pitching list.
bluester
3/04
Mike,

Can you make a general comment on how your bid limits for 'only' leagues would be affected by adding a 13th team? I play in 13 team NL only. Thanks.

Steve
lemurine
3/06
Hi Mike,

I know you suggested that in a keeper league, 12 team only, that in deciding to extend a contract you want to see that there is, at least, a $5 buffer eg I have Ad Russell at $10, if I believe he will be worth at least $20 in the future, it is probably ok to increase his salary and contract to $15, as a general rule of course.

My question is whether this takes into account inflation or not. I presume it does.

Thanks, much. Good luck in all your leagues this yr.
MikeGianella
3/07
Yes, the $5 rule is my general rule of thumb with players. I would bump Russell up to $15.

You could bump him higher because of inflation. But I don't do that because that takes the value away from the player - and your team.
bluester
3/07
Mike,

In case you missed this question, thanks.

Mike,

Can you make a general comment on how your bid limits for 'only' leagues would be affected by adding a 13th team? I play in 13 team NL only. Thanks.

Steve
MikeGianella
3/07
This is an old article from my pre-BP, blogging days, but should give you a rough idea of the price differences between 12 and 13-team leagues. You will have to reverse the calculations. http://rotothinktank.blogspot.com/2009/03/adjusting-for-smaller-leagues.html
bluester
3/07
Mike,
Thanks. Just read the article. Based on that it sounds like you would say that in a 13 only compared to a 12 you would leave the top guys unchanged but expect more dollars to go to the middle and perhaps more upward pressure on the bottom as well. If this is the case, does a deeper league enhance the attraction of spread the risk as opposed to S&S?
Steve
MikeGianella
3/07
Yes, especially given how weak the bottom teams are in the NL currently.