Chad Bradford P |
Years | G | IP | W | L | SV | ERA | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 561 | 515.7 | 36 | 28 | 11 | 3.26 | 8.5 |
|
|
YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1998 | CHA | MLB | 29 | 0 | 30.7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 100 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0% | .252 | 1.11 | 3.18 | 3.23 | 97 | 4.68 | 96.9 | 0.2 |
1999 | CHA | MLB | 3 | 0 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 98 | 22.1 | 12.3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | .444 | 3.82 | 10.83 | 19.64 | 125 | 9.10 | 176.9 | -0.1 |
2000 | CHA | MLB | 12 | 0 | 13.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 90 | 8.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 0% | .310 | 1.02 | 2.12 | 1.98 | 75 | 4.09 | 78.7 | 0.2 |
2001 | OAK | MLB | 35 | 0 | 36.7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 94 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 0% | .327 | 1.28 | 3.94 | 2.70 | 71 | 3.08 | 63.9 | 0.9 |
2002 | OAK | MLB | 75 | 0 | 75.3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 73 | 14 | 56 | 2 | 95 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 6.7 | 0% | .303 | 1.15 | 2.67 | 3.11 | 70 | 3.06 | 65.6 | 1.9 |
2003 | OAK | MLB | 72 | 0 | 77.0 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 67 | 30 | 62 | 7 | 94 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 7.2 | 0% | .278 | 1.26 | 4.10 | 3.04 | 81 | 3.27 | 68.6 | 1.8 |
2004 | OAK | MLB | 68 | 0 | 59.0 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 51 | 24 | 34 | 5 | 104 | 7.8 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 0% | .251 | 1.27 | 4.57 | 4.42 | 93 | 4.49 | 92.7 | 0.7 |
2005 | BOS | MLB | 31 | 0 | 23.3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 106 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 0% | .326 | 1.41 | 3.64 | 3.86 | 91 | 4.09 | 88.0 | 0.4 |
2006 | NYN | MLB | 70 | 0 | 62.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 59 | 13 | 45 | 1 | 90 | 8.6 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 6.5 | 0% | .301 | 1.16 | 2.49 | 2.90 | 71 | 2.91 | 59.2 | 1.9 |
2007 | BAL | MLB | 78 | 0 | 64.7 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 77 | 16 | 29 | 1 | 101 | 10.7 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0% | .321 | 1.44 | 3.62 | 3.34 | 94 | 4.74 | 98.1 | 0.5 |
2008 | BAL | 0 | 47 | 0 | 40.3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 106 | 9.1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 0% | .285 | 1.19 | 3.75 | 2.45 | 101 | 4.36 | 92.9 | 0.5 |
2008 | TBA | 0 | 21 | 0 | 19.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 105 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0% | .254 | 1.37 | 4.84 | 1.42 | 116 | 6.11 | 130.4 | -0.2 |
2009 | TBA | MLB | 20 | 0 | 10.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 106 | 19.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 5.2 | 0% | .457 | 2.32 | 3.81 | 4.35 | 130 | 7.50 | 160.9 | -0.3 |
2008 | TOT | MLB | 68 | 0 | 59.3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 59 | 15 | 17 | 3 | 106 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 0% | .000 | 1.25 | 4.10 | 2.12 | 106 | 4.92 | 104.9 | 0.3 |
Career | MLB | 561 | 0 | 515.7 | 36 | 28 | 11 | 527 | 137 | 313 | 28 | 98 | 9.2 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 67% | .298 | 1.29 | 3.59 | 3.26 | 86 | 3.97 | 82.8 | 8.5 |
YEAR | Team | Lg | LG | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996 | HIC | A | SAL | 28 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 27 | 1 | 6.3 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 8.1 | 0% | .000 | 0.93 | 2.63 | 0.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1997 | WNS | A+ | CRL | 46 | 0 | 54.7 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 51 | 25 | 43 | 2 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 7.1 | 0% | .285 | 1.39 | 3.81 | 3.95 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1998 | CHA | MLB | AL | 29 | 0 | 30.7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 100 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0% | .252 | 1.11 | 3.18 | 3.23 | 97 | 4.68 | 96.9 |
1998 | BIR | AA | SOU | 10 | 0 | 17.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 6.8 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 7.3 | 0% | -.458 | 1.21 | 4.75 | 2.60 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1998 | CLG | AAA | PCL | 29 | 0 | 51.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 11 | 27 | 3 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 0% | -1.093 | 1.20 | 4.02 | 1.94 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1999 | CHA | MLB | AL | 3 | 0 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 98 | 22.1 | 12.3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | .444 | 3.82 | 10.83 | 19.64 | 125 | 9.10 | 176.9 |
1999 | CHR | AAA | INT | 47 | 0 | 74.3 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 63 | 15 | 56 | 2 | 7.6 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 6.8 | 0% | -.836 | 1.05 | 2.87 | 1.94 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
2000 | CHA | MLB | AL | 12 | 0 | 13.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 90 | 8.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 0% | .310 | 1.02 | 2.12 | 1.98 | 75 | 4.09 | 78.7 |
2000 | CHR | AAA | INT | 55 | 0 | 53.7 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 38 | 12 | 42 | 2 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 7.0 | 0% | -.632 | 0.93 | 2.78 | 1.51 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
2001 | OAK | MLB | AL | 35 | 0 | 36.7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 94 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 0% | .327 | 1.28 | 3.94 | 2.70 | 71 | 3.08 | 63.9 |
2001 | SAC | AAA | PCL | 12 | 0 | 23.7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 9.1 | 0% | -.577 | 0.72 | 1.77 | 0.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
2002 | OAK | MLB | AL | 75 | 0 | 75.3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 73 | 14 | 56 | 2 | 95 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 6.7 | 0% | .303 | 1.15 | 2.67 | 3.11 | 70 | 3.06 | 65.6 |
2003 | OAK | MLB | AL | 72 | 0 | 77.0 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 67 | 30 | 62 | 7 | 94 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 7.2 | 0% | .278 | 1.26 | 4.10 | 3.04 | 81 | 3.27 | 68.6 |
2004 | OAK | MLB | AL | 68 | 0 | 59.0 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 51 | 24 | 34 | 5 | 104 | 7.8 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 0% | .251 | 1.27 | 4.57 | 4.42 | 93 | 4.49 | 92.7 |
2004 | SAC | AAA | PCL | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 0% | .250 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
2005 | BOS | MLB | AL | 31 | 0 | 23.3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 106 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 0% | .326 | 1.41 | 3.64 | 3.86 | 91 | 4.09 | 88.0 |
2005 | STO | A+ | CLF | 3 | 0 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11.7 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 0% | -1.500 | 1.74 | 4.29 | 3.91 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
2005 | SAC | AAA | PCL | 3 | 1 | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0% | -1.500 | 1.33 | 7.17 | 6.00 | 104 | 5.24 | 103.3 |
2006 | NYN | MLB | NL | 70 | 0 | 62.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 59 | 13 | 45 | 1 | 90 | 8.6 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 6.5 | 0% | .301 | 1.16 | 2.49 | 2.90 | 71 | 2.91 | 59.2 |
2007 | BAL | MLB | AL | 78 | 0 | 64.7 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 77 | 16 | 29 | 1 | 101 | 10.7 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0% | .321 | 1.44 | 3.62 | 3.34 | 94 | 4.74 | 98.1 |
2008 | BAL | MLB | AL | 47 | 0 | 40.3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 106 | 9.1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 0% | .285 | 1.19 | 3.75 | 2.45 | 101 | 4.36 | 92.9 |
2008 | TBA | MLB | AL | 21 | 0 | 19.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 105 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0% | .254 | 1.37 | 4.84 | 1.42 | 116 | 6.11 | 130.4 |
2009 | TBA | MLB | AL | 20 | 0 | 10.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 106 | 19.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 5.2 | 0% | .457 | 2.32 | 3.81 | 4.35 | 130 | 7.50 | 160.9 |
2009 | PCH | A+ | FSL | 6 | 0 | 6.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 0% | .250 | 0.67 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 82 | 3.54 | 74.5 |
2009 | MNT | AA | SOU | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 92 | 13.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 0% | .500 | 2.00 | 4.09 | 4.50 | 87 | 6.17 | 129.7 |
2009 | DUR | AAA | INT | 4 | 0 | 4.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 122 | 13.4 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 0% | .368 | 1.70 | 2.93 | 5.74 | 101 | 5.37 | 113.0 |
YEAR | Pits | Zone% | Swing% | Contact% | Z-Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Contact% | O-Contact% | SwStr% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 701 | 0.5777 | 0.5207 | 0.8740 | 0.6741 | 0.3108 | 0.8974 | 0.8043 | 0.1260 |
2009 | 176 | 0.6932 | 0.5398 | 0.8842 | 0.6311 | 0.3333 | 0.9351 | 0.6667 | 0.1158 |
Career | 877 | 0.6009 | 0.5245 | 0.8760 | 0.6655 | 0.3153 | 0.9050 | 0.7767 | 0.1240 |
Injury History — No longer being updated | Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET |
Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009-07-19 | 2009-08-19 | 15-DL | 31 | 27 | - | Low Back | Tightness | - | ||
2009-03-27 | 2009-06-27 | 15-DL | 92 | 75 | Right | Elbow | Recovery From Surgery | Loose Bodies | 2009-02-05 | |
2009-02-05 | 2009-03-27 | Camp | 50 | 0 | Right | Elbow | Surgery | Loose Bodies | 2009-02-05 | |
2007-03-03 | 2007-03-06 | Camp | 3 | 0 | Right | Forearm | Contusion | Batted Ball | - | |
2005-03-30 | 2005-07-13 | 60-DL | 105 | 87 | - | Low Back | Surgery | Herniated Disc | 2005-03-07 | |
2004-08-08 | 2004-08-24 | 15-DL | 16 | 15 | - | Low Back | Strain | - | ||
2004-02-27 | 2004-03-15 | Camp | 17 | 0 | - | Low Back | Spasms | - |
Compensation
|
|
2019 Preseason Forecast | Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET |
PCT | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | BABIP | WHIP | ERA | DRA | VORP | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted Mean | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 0.0 | ? | 0 | 0 | ? | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ? | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Date | Question | Answer |
---|---|---|
2014-08-06 16:30:00 (link to chat) | Which two baseball player active or not would you like to see participate in a bowling competition? (J-Peso from New Jersey) | Chad Bradford would probably dominate. Josh Collmenter would be fun to watch bowl if forced to bowl from his ridiculously high arm slot. (Cespedes Family BBQ) |
2013-04-12 14:00:00 (link to chat) | Some years ago Bill James theorized that we would see more submariners because the motion was less stress on the arm and it was a different look, among other things. Instead of a time in the '80s where we had (the effective) Steve Olin and (the not very effective) Todd Frohwirth, now we have no one that I know of. Why did submariners disappear, and is there a chance that style will be resurrected, ever if not anytime soon? Is there anyone in the minors to carry the torch for this very different style? (delatopia from San Francisco) | The true submariner seems to have all but disappeared (paging Chad Bradford), but I think that we are seeing many more pitchers who adopt a straight sidearm slot. The emphasis on platoon splits and LOOGY's has created a tendency toward closed angles and low trajectories to maximize the lateral movement on pitches, particularly with relievers. I would have to defer to our killer prospect team to uncover any hidden subs in the minors. (Doug Thorburn) |
2009-09-10 13:00:00 (link to chat) | I am a reference librarian and was recently asked if there were more sidearmers in the 80s. (Actually the questioner asked about sideways pitchers.) I don't recall this but it may be true. The discussion came around to mechanics. Is pitching sidearm easier on the pitcher than overhand? To my mind the arm strain would be pretty close but sidearm would seem to be easier on the shoulder. (Steve N from Delaware) | The strain is different, but I'm not sure about "easier". There's a sample size question and I'm not sure if we have much reliable data on sidearmers. The only guy I know has been analyzed is Chad Bradford and he is *not* a sidearm/submariner. (Will Carroll) |
2009-09-10 13:00:00 (link to chat) | If Chad Bradford is *not* a submariner, what the hell is he? (Scott from Chicago) | He is a standard pitcher that bends sideways at the waist. (Will Carroll) |
2008-11-07 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Andy MacPhail has been quoted as saying not to get"our expectations" too high in terms of the player to be named later in the Chad Bradford trade. Most of us in Baltimore are reading that as the guy will get will never see the light of day in the Majors.
There's some saved salary here. But is it really worthwhile to save a couple million dollars at the cost of a very useful reliever, one who added a lot, in fact, to Tampa Bay's pennant drive? (Playwright22 from Baltimore) | Absolutely. Bradford might be worth a win or two. Might. That doesn't matter. If you pick the right guy, maybe you get four or five wins over a period of years from a reliever, a bench guy, a spot starter. You always cash in the veteran chips when you're in the Orioles' shoes, even if you're getting back the 15th-best guy in another organization.
The extreme application of this is the Twins a couple years back, when they got back two zeroes for Luis Castillo. (Joe Sheehan) |
2008-07-21 15:00:00 (link to chat) | I've had the woman pitcher argument with a friend of mine that played collegiate softball. Except, I was the one saying that a woman could pitch in MLB and she said no way. My theory is that the first woman pitcher will be relief specialist, Chad Bradford type? The first woman pitcher isn't going to be a former tennis player, she'll be softball player, so becoming a submariner would seem to make more sense... (Conor Glassey from Woodinville, WA) | Possible, but still have to throw the ball ... and Bradford's not a submariner, dangit! (Will Carroll) |
2008-07-09 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Can you explain how submariners like Chad Bradford are able to generate so much velocity? Is it really still a "whip" action, but flipped over? When I try it for fun, it just doesn't flow. (Mark from Baltimore) | First, Bradford isn't a sidearm or submariner pitcher. He's a standard "classic" pitcher.
Yes, really. I wrote about this for Boston Dirt Dogs a couple years ago: http://bostondirtdogs.boston.com/Headline_Archives/2005/07/special_deliver.html (Will Carroll) |
2008-05-22 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Isn't the reason Neshek went to that motion because he had injury issues with an overhand motion? (tfierst from MN) | Yes. This is correct. ("Atlantic City" by Springsteen) It worked for him, but was untenable long term I thought. Maybe he'll come back like Chad Bradford. (Will Carroll) |
No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
Although he has not thrown an MLB pitch in 2024, Chad Bradford threw 1,235 pitches that were tracked by the PITCHf/x system between 2007 and 2009, all of them occuring in Spring Training. In 2009, he relied primarily on his Fourseam Fastball (79mph) and Curve (67mph). He also rarely threw a Change (74mph).
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.