Eddie Bane PTwins |
Years | G | IP | W | L | SV | ERA | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 44 | 168 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 4.66 | -2.8 |
|
|
YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1973 | MIN | MLB | 23 | 6 | 60.3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 62 | 30 | 42 | 5 | 107 | 9.2 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 0% | .302 | 1.52 | 3.85 | 4.92 | 96 | 5.07 | 120.0 | -0.3 |
1975 | MIN | MLB | 4 | 4 | 28.3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 104 | 8.9 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 4.4 | 0% | .277 | 1.52 | 4.17 | 2.86 | 130 | 6.34 | 150.0 | -0.5 |
1976 | MIN | MLB | 17 | 15 | 79.3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 92 | 39 | 24 | 6 | 105 | 10.4 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 0% | .297 | 1.65 | 4.47 | 5.11 | 129 | 6.61 | 165.6 | -2.1 |
Career | MLB | 44 | 25 | 168.0 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 182 | 84 | 80 | 13 | 105 | 9.8 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 52% | .295 | 1.58 | 4.19 | 4.66 | 117 | 6.01 | 146.6 | -2.8 |
YEAR | Team | Lg | LG | G | GS | IP | W | L | SV | H | BB | SO | HR | PPF | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | GB% | BABIP | WHIP | FIP | ERA | cFIP | DRA | DRA- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1973 | MIN | MLB | AL | 23 | 6 | 60.3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 62 | 30 | 42 | 5 | 107 | 9.2 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 0% | .302 | 1.52 | 3.85 | 4.92 | 96 | 5.07 | 120.0 |
1975 | MIN | MLB | AL | 4 | 4 | 28.3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 104 | 8.9 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 4.4 | 0% | .277 | 1.52 | 4.17 | 2.86 | 130 | 6.34 | 150.0 |
1976 | MIN | MLB | AL | 17 | 15 | 79.3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 92 | 39 | 24 | 6 | 105 | 10.4 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 0% | .297 | 1.65 | 4.47 | 5.11 | 129 | 6.61 | 165.6 |
1980 | OMA | AAA | AA | 14 | 8 | 67.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 90 | 24 | 30 | 14 | 12.1 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 0% | .000 | 1.70 | 5.80 | 5.24 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
1980 | WIC | AAA | AA | 14 | 8 | 67.0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 91 | 24 | 30 | 15 | 12.2 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0% | .000 | 1.72 | 5.99 | 5.37 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
YEAR | Pits | Zone% | Swing% | Contact% | Z-Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Contact% | O-Contact% | SwStr% |
---|
Injury History — No longer being updated | Last Update: 12/31/2014 23:59 ET |
Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
---|
Compensation
|
|
2019 Preseason Forecast | Last Update: 1/27/2017 12:35 ET |
PCT | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | BABIP | WHIP | ERA | DRA | VORP | WARP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted Mean | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 0.0 | ? | 0 | 0 | ? | .000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ? | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Date | Question | Answer |
---|---|---|
2013-01-09 13:00:00 (link to chat) | Following up on John's (Vegas) question, the first of the day: Are there regions of the United States that represent "market inefficiencies" at this point? I think of Mike Trout. Granted, he was a first-round pick, but in retrospect he clearly deserved to be a much higher first-round pick. Was the issue there that the level of competition in New Jersey is such (i.e., lower than in Southern California) that the comparison population makes all players there tough to scout? Or could it be that there should have been more scouts in New Jersey? (Rob from DC) | Great question, Rob from DC. Some clubs have an issue drafting high school position players, and most value pitching over offense, and those factors came into play I am sure. Plus, Trout playing in Jersey is a tougher high draft due to the amount you got to see him play in his senior year and the level of competition was just okay. He really impressed the heck out of me in showcases and tournaments prior to his senior year. Hitting is the toughest thing to scout, and Eddie Bane made a great decison. (Dan Evans) |
2012-10-30 13:00:00 (link to chat) | The Angels have lost both Eddie Bane and Tom Kotchman from their scouting department. Is this simply attrition or something sinister afoot? (Santi Cazorla from Sacramento) | Hi Santi. Having no knowledge of the situation at all, my guess would be attrition. Guys move around a lot for many different reasons. But yeah, Kotchman has been there a long time, so... I guess what I'm saying is that your guess literally and figuratively is as good as mine. (Geoff Young) |
Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
---|---|---|
2009-06-09 14:30:00 | 2009 Draft Coverage | I accept those props, thanks. My source thought Trout was ahead of Grichuk, but, well they both went to the Angels. Maybe Eddie Bane wanted Trout to get his Brady Quinn moment with Jonathan Mayo first. That was a little awkward to watch, but great payoff right afterwards for Trout. (Kiley McDaniel) |
BP Annual Player Comments
No BP Book Comments have been found for this player.