BP Comment Quick Links
February 10, 2015 Tools of IgnoranceHow the Padres Won the OffseasonNot sure if you have heard or not, but the Padres have gone from being incredibly boring to intriguing and, more importantly, playoff contenders. How did they do it? They acquired better players. How did they acquire better players? Through trades (mostly) and free agent signings (less-ly). The exciting part is that San Diego was able to do so without completely wiping out their farm system (holding onto their three top prospects in Austin Hedges, Hunter Renfroe, and Matt Wisler as well as Rymer Liriano) and without spending a ton of cash. Put differently, the Padres paid a price to become relevant, but it was a price far less than anyone would have guessed given the pieces they acquired. So how were the Padres—a team that was thought to be relatively void of playoff-level talent—able to position themselves as playoff contenders at such a seemingly low price? They did so by being opportunistic and leveraging depth, which they were able to do by finding motivated sellers and acquiring value instead of focusing on need. Being there (for motivated sellers) Richard Thaler, who coined the term, describes the endowment effect as “the fact that people often demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it.” This is most famously demonstrated in a study conducted by Daniel Kahneman, Jack Knetsch, and Thaler, which “found that randomly assigned owners of a mug required significantly more money to part with their possession (around $7) than randomly assigned buyers were willing to pay to acquire it (around $3).” While I am currently unaware of a follow up study, I am comfortable predicting that the “sellers” would lower their selling price if given a second mug they would not use (redundancy) or if they were told their mug would be taken away from them before they would be able to use it (Upton). By finding equivalent situations in the offseason trade market, it appears that the Padres have been able to somewhat avoid this premium by targeting players who are more valuable to them than they were to their current team. If this is seemingly such a great tactic, then why are not more teams employing it or employing it as frequently as the Padres? Acquiring value first, worrying about need later The issue with framing our decision through weaknesses is that the market does not always give us a nice, neat solution to upgrading those weaknesses. Sometimes, given what is available in free agency or the trade market, the best way to upgrade is to go from good to great as opposed to bad to mediocre. Maybe for the Padres, the best or most affordable way of upgrading was to trade from their minor-league and major-league depth for redundant or expiring more-likely-to-be-impact players such as Wil Myers, Derek Norris, and Justin Upton. While an upgrade at shortstop seemed like the easiest way for the Padres to improve in 2015, maybe the best option out there was signing a seemingly undervalued James Shields. To borrow a golf term, “It ain’t how, it’s how many.” It does not matter how each team goes about creating or preventing runs, it only matters how many are created and prevented. Lastly, but maybe most importantly, being opportunistic and relatively indiscriminate about finding value seems to have allowed for the Padres to find situations where the impact of winner’s curse is not as evident. Again, as you guessed it, this is speculative because we were not involved in the trade discussions, but given the rumors we heard, fierce bidding wars did not appear to have taken place. More importantly, given the prices paid, the bidding wars did not drive up prices enough to the point where we would have believed them to be fierce. By looking for value as opposed to focusing on a weakness, the Padres were able to find more buyer-friendly markets. What is next?
Jeff Quinton is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @jjq01
19 comments have been left for this article.
|
I think the Padres had a perfect storm happen for this offseason to take place. Their offense has been historically bad for two years, they don't really *love* anyone on their team, and they hired a new GM who doesn't have any loyalty to the guys they had when he got there.
For one, it's difficult to trade "fan favorites," because they're normally good performers and you risk alienating your fanbase by not re-signing or trading them. Ask Atlanta about getting rid of Heyward, The Good Upton, and El Oso Blanco in the same off-season. They were vilified for starting their rebuild for when they re-open in 2017 in Cobb County. And their ticket sales are likely to drop as a result this summer.
San Diego had no position players (after their NYY trade of Chase Headley) that any fans really felt passionate about. They were a collection of under-performing failed prospects or journeymen. That allowed Preller to make the trades/signings that most GMs wouldn't have the ability to make. And kudos to him for making those trades.
I agree with you to an extent, but credit where credit is due for Preller working the phone lines, building the relationships and not just improving assets literally anyone could improve, but obtaining talented assets that fit a plan.
I don't buy the Padres as true contenders, but offseason winners? Hands down the Padres win.
Anybody claiming Red Sox as offseason winners doesn't understand big market teams, free agency, and money.