CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here to subscribe
No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Imbalance Sheet: B... (02/01)
Next Column >>
The Imbalance Sheet: C... (02/22)
No Next Article

February 8, 2001

The Imbalance Sheet

Mooning Over Montreal

by Keith Law

Baseball Weekly recently ran a Bob Nightengale column that focused on some of Scott Boras's ideas for improving competitive balance. Buried at the end of the article was an interesting quote from a major-league general manager that cited the most oft-repeated mantra of the small-marketeers.

As part of the argument, Nightengale quotes Kansas City GM Allard Baird (hardly a bastion of credibility these days) as saying, "Let's face it, Montreal has done as good a job as anyone in the game as far as producing legitimate impact players, but once they developed the players, they've had to move them. That's why there has to be a restructuring of the economic system of the game."

Is this really true? Everyone loves to talk about how Montreal has had to deal all of its top talent away, but in reality, Montreal didn't lose that much of value. Let's look at the 1994 Expos' top players:

C  Darrin Fletcher
1B Cliff Floyd
2B Mike Lansing
3B Sean Berry
SS Wil Cordero
LF Moises Alou
CF Marquis Grissom
RF Larry Walker

SP Ken Hill SP Pedro Martinez SP Jeff Fassero SP Kirk Rueter SP Butch Henry

RP John Wetteland RP Mel Rojas

Larry Walker and Pedro Martinez were clear losses for the team. John Wetteland was never as effective after he left as he was in 1993-94 but he has had over 200 saves since then, so it's hard to argue that that wasn't a loss for the team as well. Beyond those guys, though, the record is mixed. Here are some of the stats of the other players on that team (and the 1993 squad) since they left Montreal:

Name             Yrs    G    AB    R  HR  RBI   SB  CS    BB   OBP   SLG
Darrin Fletcher   3   361  1235  128  47  190    1   0    71  .336  .470
Mike Lansing      3   327  1233  169  27  141   20   5    84  .312  .397
Wil Cordero       5   476  1799  268  58  258    8   7   111  .321  .447
Marquis Grissom   6   883  3520  476  91  387  136  57   243  .317  .404
Moises Alou       4   435  1576  274  91  353   23  11   206  .396  .563
Delino DeShields  7   884  3209  488  49  333  243  74   387  .348  .386

Delino DeShields, Wil Cordero, Mike Lansing, and Marquis Grissom have all been lousy since leaving, and both Cordero and DeShields had to move to the outfield because of defensive woes. Fletcher, who wasn't a farm system product in Montreal (he came up with the Dodgers in 1989), has been good since his departure, but that's largely the product of his superb 2000 season. A catcher with a .336 OBP is hardly the kind of loss that breaks a team.

That leaves us with Moises Alou among the departing hitters, and while his stats above are excellent, they come with one caveat. Alou missed one entire season, 1999, due to a pair of weird knee injuries, and he has missed enough other games so that his average number of games played since he left Montreal is only 109. His 1997 season wasn't particularly special either, so since he left, he has had two spectacular seasons, a mediocre one, and one lost to injury. How much is that worth to most teams? Few but the highest-revenue teams could absorb that kind of four-year performance from an $8 million-per-year player.

You'll notice that I omitted Cliff Floyd. Floyd's future was still in doubt at the time that the Expos finally gave up on him before the 1997 season. In exchange for Floyd, the Expos received Dustin Hermanson, who proceeded to give the team four years of generally good pitching and who garnered Fernando Tatis in a trade this winter. Floyd, meanwhile, has played in just 414 games in those four seasons, and didn't crack a .500 slugging average until 1999. Of course, the Expos got something of value when they dealt DeShields as well.

Name           W   L   SV    IP      H    ER    HR     BB    SO    ERA
Ken Hill      53  55    0   939   1005   482    95    449   557   4.62
Jeff Fassero  42  43    0   745    810   387   105    283   576   4.67
Kirk Rueter   56  36    0   770    829   361    95    230   398   4.22
Mel Rojas      5   8   17   157    168   111    30     75   144   6.35

The record of ex-Expo pitchers is even worse. Ken Hill had a great won/lost record in 1994, but his peripherals weren't sound, so moving him when they did was the right move for the Expos. Jeff Fassero had been worked pretty hard, and while he gave the Mariners about a year and a half of good pitching, he fell apart in 1999 and hasn't been the same since he left Montreal. Mel Rojas's disaster is well known and unsurprising. Of the pitchers on this chart, Kirk Rueter is the only pitcher who has had any success beyond Montreal, and he was the least expensive of the bunch by far. The Expos moved him because it looked like the magic of his 8-0 rookie year was gone, as his ERA had gone well over 4.00 (back when that was a bad thing).

So the breakup of the good Expos teams of the early 1990s wasn't necessarily the reason for the team's downfall, as most of the expensive players who got away did little after leaving. One could argue that the Expos did more damage to themselves by letting go of cheaper players like Kirk Rueter and Jeff Shaw (a reliever for the 1994 team who didn't distinguish himself until he arrived in Cincinnati in 1996) than they did via their "salary dumps."

This isn't to say that the Expos are inept in the player-development department. Vladimir Guerrero is on the short list of candidates for best player in the game. Javier Vazquez is a huge BP favorite who looks like he's on the cusp of several All-Star appearances. Jose Vidro came out of nowhere last year to become a doubles machine. Ugueth Urbina had been among the game's better relievers until elbow surgery knocked him out last year. Milton Bradley and Brad Wilkerson are both nearly ready for the majors, as is Donnie Bridges. And this ignores the prospects acquired in deals, like Peter Bergeron and Britt Reames.

However, the claim that Montreal was on the verge of a championship or a dynasty, only to be felled by a labor action and baseball's economic structure, seems spurious at best. The overachieving 1994 team would probably have gone to the playoffs, but after that season, the team's fortunes would probably have taken a turn for the worse anyway as the veterans came back to earth. That's just a matter of the natural cycles of the game. Blaming every small-market team's demise on money just won't work.

Keith Law is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by clicking here.

0 comments have been left for this article.

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Imbalance Sheet: B... (02/01)
Next Column >>
The Imbalance Sheet: C... (02/22)
No Next Article

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Playoff Prospectus: Come Undone
BP En Espanol: Previa de la NLCS: Cubs vs. D...
Playoff Prospectus: How Did This Team Get Ma...
Playoff Prospectus: Too Slow, Too Late
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: PECOTA Odds and ALCS Gam...
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: PECOTA Odds and NLCS Gam...
Playoff Prospectus: NLCS Preview: Cubs vs. D...

MORE FROM FEBRUARY 8, 2001
Transaction Analysis: January 30-February 6,...

MORE BY KEITH LAW
2001-03-01 - The Imbalance Sheet: Sizing Up Markets
2001-02-22 - The Imbalance Sheet: Curt Schilling Speaks
2001-02-09 - The Daily Prospectus: OK, Brewer Fans...
2001-02-08 - The Imbalance Sheet: Mooning Over Montreal
2001-02-01 - The Imbalance Sheet: Broken Promises
2001-01-17 - The Imbalance Sheet: The Future
2000-12-22 - The Imbalance Sheet: The Really Insane Deals
More...

MORE THE IMBALANCE SHEET
2001-03-08 - The Imbalance Sheet: A Pair of Jokers
2001-03-01 - The Imbalance Sheet: Sizing Up Markets
2001-02-22 - The Imbalance Sheet: Curt Schilling Speaks
2001-02-08 - The Imbalance Sheet: Mooning Over Montreal
2001-02-01 - The Imbalance Sheet: Broken Promises
2001-01-17 - The Imbalance Sheet: The Future
2000-12-22 - The Imbalance Sheet: The Really Insane Deals
More...