CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here to subscribe
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Colli... (07/03)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Prospectus Today: Roun... (06/29)
Next Column >>
Prospectus Today: Lini... (07/05)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction Analysis S... (07/03)

July 3, 2007

Prospectus Today

Relative Virtue

by Joe Sheehan

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Tonight in San Diego, Greg Maddux takes the mound for the Padres, making his 17th start of the season. He's been essentially a league-average pitcher for the Pads this season, with a 3.66 ERA that reflects the benefits of pitching in the friendly confines of Petco Park as much as his own efforts. For a total outlay $10 million, he's providing better performance than most of the more expensive pitchers signed this past offseason.

For all of the attention paid to Roger Clemens over the past two seasons, the will-he-or-won't-he dancing and the if-yes-where speculation, Maddux has been the more valuable pitcher simply because he takes the ball all year long. For one start, or one month, Clemens is still the better bet because of his stuff, his ability to miss bats, and his lesser reliance on his bullpen. But innings, especially average or better innings, have tremendous value, and Maddux provides those: 34 starts and 210 innings last season, on pace for similar numbers this year. Maddux has made at least 33 starts in every season since 1996, and would have a streak stretching back to 1988 but for the strike of 1994/lockout of 1995.

I've compared the two at various intervals over the past few years, with similar conclusions: Clemens' career has been greater than that of Maddux. How does this look now? Clemens has extended his edges in WARP (196.4-161.8) and runs saved (1954-1628) to margins that Maddux will almost certainly be unable to close unless he pitches until he's close to 50. Clemens also has a higher, if less concentrated, peak, which means his edge in value is a bit higher than is shown here.

I started thinking about Maddux last week while writing about Mark Buehrle. Not because the two are similar in type, but because of this: Mark Buehrle's career is basically Greg Maddux's decline phase:


                       IP    ERA     WARP    PRAR
Buerhle, career      1528    3.79    46.5     461
Maddux, 2001-2007    1386.2  3.71    40.4     440

We're actually shorting Maddux here by giving Buehrle credit for 50 good innings, mostly out of the bullpen, in 2000. Give Maddux 50 random innings from 2000, and he closes the gap in all three counting categories. As you can see, though, the two pitchers have been essentially equivalent in value over this time, and it's not like Buehrle's peripherals have been that much better than Mad Dog's. Maddux has a higher aggregate Stuff score, although Buehrle's best seasons have been slightly better--and more recent--than Maddux's. Setting aside handedness, we're dealing with similar pitchers here, durable strike-throwers whose strikeout rates aren't very good, who don't overpower hitters with their stuff, and who occasionally have trouble with the long ball.

The White Sox seem prepared to pay Buehrle $50 million or more to retain his services for the next four seasons, and that's a discount of $30 million or more in total contract value compared to what the market would offer the left-hander. Maddux just came off of a three-year deal for $27 million (signed during a bear market for baseball players) and is currently working on a one-year, $10 million deal that includes an option for 2008, one of the smartest contracts any team agreed to this winter.

I know that age is a consideration here, but I think it's worth mentioning that Greg Maddux, while being an afterthought in award voting and the national consciousness since 2000, has essentially been just as effective as a perceived star who's about to become incredibly wealthy. The comparison to Buehrle is reasonably close, at least; if you compare Maddux to the free-agent class of 2006-07, the ones he was on the market with a year ago, it becomes a bit silly. Greg Maddux's decline phase dwarfs the entire careers of Ted Lilly and Gil Meche and Vicente Padilla.

Admittedly, I'm not objective. Greg Maddux is my favorite pitcher ever, someone whose starts I built my schedule around for years, and a pitcher whose greatness, I fear, may never be recognized because he had the misfortune to peak during a season truncated by a work stoppage. Unlike pitchers who are perceived as superior, he had the poor timing to pitch through one of the greatest hitting eras the game has ever known, and yet he stayed in the rotation and kept runs off the scoreboard. Even in the twilight of his career, his work stands toe-to-toe with the work of pitchers who will be treated as the belles of the ball when it comes time to court.

So tonight around 10 p.m. Eastern, flip on your TV, or your radio, or your computer, and catch some of that greatness from San Diego. Maybe Maddux isn't the subject of bidding wars and speculation each offseason, but that doesn't make his contributions any less entertaining.

Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Joe's other articles. You can contact Joe by clicking here

Related Content:  Greg Maddux

0 comments have been left for this article.

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Colli... (07/03)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Prospectus Today: Roun... (06/29)
Next Column >>
Prospectus Today: Lini... (07/05)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction Analysis S... (07/03)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Playoff Prospectus: Come Undone
BP En Espanol: Previa de la NLCS: Cubs vs. D...
Playoff Prospectus: How Did This Team Get Ma...
Playoff Prospectus: Too Slow, Too Late
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: PECOTA Odds and ALCS Gam...
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: PECOTA Odds and NLCS Gam...
Playoff Prospectus: NLCS Preview: Cubs vs. D...

MORE FROM JULY 3, 2007
Premium Article Prospectus Matchups: Millstones and Mileston...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis Special
Premium Article Under The Knife: Collision Course
Prospectus Toolbox: Measuring Team Defense
Premium Article Nippon Prospectus

MORE BY JOE SHEEHAN
2007-07-10 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: So Wang He's Right, and Mr...
2007-07-09 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Picking Pitchers
2007-07-05 - Prospectus Today: Lining Up Your Ducks
2007-07-03 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Relative Virtue
2007-06-29 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Round Number Day
2007-06-28 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: The Buehrle Dilemma
2007-06-26 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: The Meaning of the Milesto...
More...

MORE PROSPECTUS TODAY
2007-07-10 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: So Wang He's Right, and Mr...
2007-07-09 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Picking Pitchers
2007-07-05 - Prospectus Today: Lining Up Your Ducks
2007-07-03 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Relative Virtue
2007-06-29 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: Round Number Day
2007-06-28 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: The Buehrle Dilemma
2007-06-26 - Premium Article Prospectus Today: The Meaning of the Milesto...
More...