BP Comment Quick Links
February 19, 2015 Rumor RoundupThe Cole Hamels Return That Amaro Turned Down
Cole Hamels wants out of Philadelphia
I just want to win. That's all. That's all any competitor wants. And I know it's not going to happen here. This isn't what I expected. It's not what the Phillies expected, either. But it's reality.
Nightengale made it clear that Hamels wasn’t demanding a trade and that he expresses no ill will toward the organization. However, a rebuild isn’t what the southpaw signed up for when he signed a six-year deal back in 2012. This shouldn’t come as too much of a shock and neither should Hamels telling Nightengale that he would waive his no-trade clause to go to the Red Sox. There are 20 teams on Hamels’ no-trade list (the Yankees, Rangers, Padres and six unknown NL teams aren’t on it), but at this point, that list serves more as a way for Hamels to leverage the contender that eventually trades for him into picking up his option, rather than a means of staying in Philadelphia. The other interesting bit from Nightengale’s article: the specific players in a few potential trades that have either been proposed or shot down by the Phillies. Blake Swihart’s name has come up in previous reports, and according to Nightengale, the Phillies continue to demand the prized backstop in a deal with the Red Sox. The same goes for Carlos Martinez in any potential deal with the Cardinals. The Dodgers have reportedly refused to include any of their elite prospects in trade talks. Then there are the Padres, who reportedly offered both Austin Hedges and Hunter Renfroe in a package that was turned down by the Phillies. There’s also a decent chance this was the “aggressive offer” Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports reported the Padres made prior to inking James Shields to a deal last week. If that’s the case, it’s even more unlikely that A.J. Preller would now be willing to include a third blue chipper to a deal. It remains likely that Hamels will don a Phillies uniform come Opening Day; Amaro isn’t getting the type of return he feels is necessary to trade away his biggest trade chit and stands a better chance at getting a team to overpay come the trade deadline. Playing the waiting game runs the obvious risk of injury or a possible decline in performance, but Amaro only gets one chance to bring in a massive haul for Hamels. It’s clear he’s willing to wait to make sure it counts. Braves showing strong interest in Jackie Bradley Jr. But oh, how much difference a year can make for a prospect’s perceived value. Bradley proved to have a ton of swing-and-miss in his game and provided little pop to make up for it, resulting in a horrendous .198/.265/.266 line across 423 plate appearances. The Red Sox subsequently demoted him in August with whispers of stubbornness and resistance to advice from his coaches. Fast-forward to the present time and Bradley is buried at the back of a deep Boston outfield depth chart and failed to crack the top 10 of Boston’s 25-and-under list. The Braves aren’t expected to compete in 2015, so buying low on Bradley and providing him the playing time to straighten out his approach at the plate would be a sensible move toward the future if John Hart & Co. can convince the Red Sox to part ways with the former top prospect. For the time being, however, this is merely a story to file away until the outfield picture in Boston becomes clearer in spring training; Gammons writes that any serious trade talks between the two sides is unlikely to take place before St. Patrick’s Day.
Chris Mosch is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @chris_mosch
1 comment has been left for this article.
|
What would Atlanta possibly trade for Bradley, jr? It seems like the Red Sox would be selling as low as they could on Bradley here. Asking for a player with current or future value seems like too much and taking any player who isn't of future value of the team seems like selling way too low.