BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
February 6, 2015 The Lineup CardEight Offseason Rumors That Fizzled1. Jordan Zimmermann to the Cubs Who knows what would have been different for Max Scherzer. It’s unlikely that they would have paid more had Scott Boras come to the negotiating table against a National team that actually needed a starter. How much more is there to pay? Maybe they couldn’t have gotten the backload in there. But still, with Zimmermann being a free agent after this season, it looks even more like a good match of trade partners. —Zachary Levine 2. Troy Tulowitzki to the Yankees... 3. ...or the Mets Of course, if the Mets had actually landed Tulo, it would have led to days and days of #hottakes, and we could have all wondered if maybe they could crawl out of the basement behind that bat and the strong pitching. —Kate Morrison 4. Matt Kemp to the Mariners Enter the Ned Colletti-less Los Angeles Dodgers. Already overcrowded in the outfield, the emergence of Joc Pederson during the 2014 season all but forced LA’s new regime to trade from surplus. The Mariners, with money to spend and a lineup spot to fill, were a natural trading partner, and strong rumors of a potential Matt Kemp-to-Seattle deal graced headlines for months. Though Zduriencik reportedly dangled shortstop Brad Miller and agreed to absorb roughly half of the $107 million Kemp is owed through the end of his contract, the Dodgers held out for more. Ultimately, the Dodgers asking price grew too high, and the Mariners backed out of trade talks. Soon after, Kemp was dealt south to San Diego, quieting some of the offseason’s loudest rumors. —Brendan Gawlowski 5. Cole Hamels to the Rangers Still, Cole Hamels to the Texas Rangers was one of the more interesting rumors to float about. Before consummating a trade with Milwaukee for Yovani Gallardo, the Rangers and Phillies had in-depth conversations around the framework for a Hamels trade, according to Jon Morosi. Ken Rosenthal would add that the money owed to Hamels became a sticking point in the negotiations. The fun part of the Rangers and Phillies discussing Hamels is that the Rangers certainly have the prospect firepower to make a move for a pitcher of Hamels' caliber. Obviously these trade talks get sticky with Texas seemingly unwilling to move their intriguing prospects AND cover the remaining $96 million on Hamels' contract (not counting the fact that his 2019 option could vest for $24 million, making his contract five years, $120 million instead of four years, $96 million). Seeing Cole Hamels pitch in Texas would have been fun. It certainly would have been a challenge for the talented pitcher to adapt to the American League and a new club. It's a shame that the trade fell through this offseason, though there is still time for Hamels to be moved at some point in the coming seasons. It will certainly be interesting to see what kind of trade is made for Hamels, if he is ever moved that is. —Jeff Long 6. Melky Cabrera back to the Giants He did, to Toronto, where he scuffled through an injury-marred 2013 but bounced back in 2014, contributing 2.9 WARP to the Blue Jays' cause. After that, when Pablo Sandoval ditched San Francisco for Boston, the Giants cast a wide net to find offensive upgrades, eventually going small with Casey McGehee and Norichika Aoki. Given the way the sides parted, it was somewhat shocking to learn that the aforementioned net was wide enough to include Melky:
Rumors of a possible reunion lasted for about two weeks, before the White Sox snatched Cabrera for $42 million over three years, presumably more than the Giants were willing to pay. But had the Giants ponied up, it would've been interesting to see how Cabrera fit back into a clubhouse where the 2012 MVP criticized him for making "a bad decision" and another leader, Hunter Pence, was quick to "move on." —Daniel Rathman 7. A.J. Preller was trying to sign Pablo Sandoval to the Padres
Most likely, furiously trying to come up with an appropriate snark about it. This one was pretty good!
There were signs that Preller was serious, such as the mid-November report by Ken Rosenthal that Preller was “all over the map” and had “had baseline discussions on 200 players.” Two hundred! If you assume there are maybe 40—50?—free agents one could have baseline discussions on, that means he’d talked about 150 different trade targets. That is an incredible number. And there were signs that no matter how serious he was, it wouldn’t matter—as late as the middle of the winter meetings Padres beat writers were able to note that he hadn’t actually done anything. But more than anything, there was (to me; to you? Probably to you) a feeling that Preller’s Padres were so far away that they couldn’t possibly do much more than sign a couple players a year or two earlier than the Padres would actually need them. There was no way they’d add the two, three, even four impact hitters that this lineup would need to project as a Wild Card team. I didn’t know such an offseason was possible, and then lo and behold, it was. The rumor that the Padres were a silly joke fizzled. —Sam Miller 8. Nationals trading Stephen Strasburg Early offseason rumors about the Nationals focused on Jordan Zimmermann. But after the Scherzer signing, another name was whispered—Stephen Strasburg’s. Scott Boras has waved off chatter that Stras wants out of the District, and it would be a pretty stunning development for the Nats to ship off one of the true centerpieces of the rebuilt franchise. To get Strasburg, a team would have to give up a pretty fair package. (Strasburg has two years left of team control and is set to make $7.4 million this year.) One of the teams most mentioned as a possible destination for #37 was Boston, which of course has the young talent to be able to make such a move. I have to admit being a little surprised at the stubborn pushback from Red Sox fans—including from some thoughtful analysts—at the idea of parting ways with Mookie Betts for two years (at least) of premium starting pitching. Still, this one, from a random Redditor, has gotta take the cake:
My mistake. 26 is over the hill, so the free agent market should really be looking for people who are “young” and “have room to grow,” unlike Strasburg. Maybe Mo’ne Davis is available? —Dan Rozenson
|
The Mo’ne Davis comment is wonderful!
Thank you, I was very proud.
Cuba Gooding Jr. is available to be her agent.