BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
May 2, 2014 Painting the BlackA Trip Through the NL West
A lot happens in baseball every night, and neither man nor Daniel Rathman can keep up with it all. So every few weeks we'll look at some stories within a division that would have otherwise slipped through the cracks. Let's start with the National League West.
Colorado Rockies
In fact, the Rockies have fared well when hiring skippers. As Chris Jaffe wrote in Weiss' Baseball Prospectus 2014 comment, four of the five Colorado managers have won the Manager of the Year award during their careers, and the other finished in second. Giving the Rockies all the credit for their former skippers' success would be unfair; after all, Jim Leyland spent one season in Colorado, while Buddy Bell and Jim Tracy had previous managerial experience. The Rockies did launch the careers of Don Baylor and Clint Hurdle, however.
If you need proof of Weiss' obscurity, consider that the rest of Jaffe's comment focused on Colorado's improvements with double plays. When the man who wrote the book on managers can't find something compelling about a skipper, then what hope do the rest of us have? Let's try anyway by focusing on the fact that Weiss' second-place Rockies lead the NL in sacrifice bunts by position players.
The thought of a Coors Field-based team leading the league in bunts was unfathomable 15 years ago. Back in 1999, games played there averaged about 15 runs per pop. These days, the rate has declined and steadied at around 10 runs per game; still above the non-Coors average, but not by as much. (The exception being in 2012, when Colorado pitched poorly and experimented with a four-man rotation.) Asking any big-league hitter to bunt at Coors Field would appear a waste. To Weiss' credit, just three of the 10 bunts have happened at Coors Field, and it would appear that he has, for the most part, tasked the right players with bunting at the right times.
Four of those bunts were delivered by Brandon Barnes, while another four were split by Charlie Culberson and Charlie Blackmon; Drew Stubbs and Josh Rutledge dropped down the other two. Here are those hitters' credentials:
Now onto when the Rockies bunted:
Sabermetric wisdom suggests teams should bunt only in situations where one run is necessary, such as late in a close game. Weiss has stayed true to that thought, with eight of the 10 bunts coming in tied or one-run games, and six of the 10 happening after the sixth inning.
Weiss has strayed from the straight path a few times, including a few bunts in the fifth inning, and he seems to have a fondness for setting up the sacrifice fly that might stem from his playing days. Accusing a skipper of managing like he played is a common charge, but during Weiss' era (1987-2000), he tied for fifth in sac hits and ranked ninth in sac flies among shortstops. Whether that's at play or something else is anyone's guess, yet the Rockies finished highly in bunts by position players last season (fourth in the NL) as well.
Jack Moore wrote about the value of the bunt earlier this week, referencing Bill James' essay in his Guide to Baseball Managers. In the end, Moore excerpted James' conclusion, in which he wrote, "Maybe each of them had the right answer for his own team. The rest of us need to keep an open mind." Luckily for Weiss, he and his bunts are seldom on anyone's mind—even if they ought to be.
Los Angeles Dodgers
Since the franchise moved to Los Angeles in 1958, no team has seen more players accomplish the feat than the Dodgers (47 times)*. Gordon would need another seven seasons to match Maury Wills' franchise record, but if he set his sights lower he could pull even with Steve Sax (six), Davey Lopes (five), or Brett Butler (four). Juan Pierre and Delino DeShields, by the way, had three each.
*The Athletics (40), Royals (38), Cardinals (37), and Astros (35) round out the top five, while the Diamondbacks (four) have the fewest among franchises.
San Francisco Giants
Hudson led the A's in games started during his stay there, from 1999 to 2004, with Barry Zito, Mark Mulder, Gil Heredia, and Cory Lidle finishing second through fifth. None of those four pitchers is expected to throw a pitch this season. Zito is sitting the year out, Mulder suffered an injury that delayed his comeback attempt, Heredia is retired, and Lidle is deceased. After those four there's Rich Harden, who hasn't thrown a regular-season pitch in the majors or minors since 2011; Kevin Appier, a 2006 retiree; and Ted Lilly, a 2013 retiree. Mark Redman hasn't appeared in the majors since July 2008, and Omar Olivares hasn't since September 2001. Jimmy Haynes is the last pitcher with more than 25 starts during those years, and he hasn't toed a big-league rubber in about a decade.
Skip Mike Oquist and you reach the only active pitcher besides Hudson: Aaron Harang. There are 14 other pitchers who started a game in the green and gold, and none of them will appear in the majors barring unforeseen circumstances. Not even youngsters like Kirk Saarloos, Justin Duchscherer, Brett Laxton, Mike Wood, Marcus James, or Blake Stein. How long has Hudson been around? He's probably going to be the last starter standing from the A's Moneyball days.
San Diego Padres
Arizona Diamondbacks
Cahill is missing more bats and generating more groundballs in the bullpen while throwing the same rate of strikes. Those gains have come despite his velocity remaining steady. His pitch selection has altered a little, particularly in two-strike counts, where he's sacrificed some changeups for curveballs. There's seemingly little reason Cahill could not take his new approach back to the rotation, but Arizona's plans for him are unclear.
Kevin Towers fancies himself a sludge merchant and Cahill, who is due $12 million next season, could be one of his next projects.
R.J. Anderson is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @r_j_anderson
|
Suggesting that Wait Weiss had a more "obscure" career than Brad Ausmus ignores everything but longevity. Weiss was a fine defensive shortstop and a decent hitter. Ausmus may have been a bright guy and a decent defensive sub, but he was among the worst hitters of his era, and arguably the worst hitter to have had a career as long as he did, bad enough to have acquired the nickname "Bad Ausmus."
Isn't it that badness that kept him from being obscure? You notice when someone that bad sticks around.
Fair objection. Let me explain why I disagree.
You are correct about Weiss out-hitting Ausmus. For their careers, Weiss hit .258/.351/.326 (a .246 TAv) while Ausmus hit .251/.325/.344 (.233). Weiss wins, no doubt. And Ausmus did accumulate about 1,600 more plate appearances. That additional playing time helps erase the offensive gap so far as value metrics are concerned. WARP gives the nod to Weiss, bWAR considers them even, and fWAR crowns Ausmus. If you go by wins-per-plate appearance Weiss is ahead. To illustrate that effect, I prorated his win rate (win/plate appearance) so that his playing time matched Ausmus. Here are those results:
WARP
Weiss without the adjustment: 17.2
Weiss with the adjustment: 22.1
Ausmus: 15.8
bWAR
Weiss without the adjustment: 16.5
Weiss with the adjustment: 21.2
Ausmus: 16.4
fWAR
Weiss without the adjustment: 14.8
Weiss with the adjustment: 19.1
Ausmus: 18.3
So the hitting and the rate statistics suggest Weiss was superior. But here's my argument for Ausmus:
1) I'm not sure we should dismiss longevity, and even if we do, I don't think the adjustment made above is the way to do it. We can probably agree that Weiss would not have played to his career win/PA rate had he stuck around for another three seasons. Maybe he would have, or maybe he would have dropped below replacement level and damaged his case here. Neither of us knows for sure.
2) This is the big one: I don't think Ausmus' defensive value is fully realized in these metrics. I realize there's no way to prove it one way or another, but the above metrics don't consider his receiving, game-calling, and staff-handling; aspects that he seemed to excel at. Teams continued to employ and play him despite his horrid offense for a reason. Perhaps they all bought into the hype, or maybe there was a Jose Molina-like aspect to his game. Again, we can't say for sure, but it wouldn't shock me if his true value exceeded the numbers listed above and, in the process, dwarfed Weiss' figures, too.
Of course I recognize those points (particularly no. 2) aren't for everyone, and I probably should've addressed the case in the piece. Rest assured, though, it wasn't a comment made without some thought.
Weiss loses a lot of anonymity points for the R.O.Y. award and All Star appearance.