BP Comment Quick Links
October 7, 2013 Playoff ProspectusALDS Game Three Preview: Red Sox at Rays
It’s win-or-go-home time for Tampa Bay again, but this is no new occurrence for this group. In fact, they’ve played three elimination games in just the last eight days to get to this point. In Game Three, each club will send their best right-handed starting pitcher to the mound (no offense to John Lackey, but no such niceties for Jeremy Hellickson). The Rays shared a similar home field advantage to Boston during the regular season (51 wins at Tropicana Field), and they’ll need all the help they can get to claw their way back to Boston. Red Sox (Clay Buchholz) at Rays (Alex Cobb) 6:00 p.m. ET Projected Starting Lineups:
The Set-Up: It’s going to be quite an uphill battle for Tampa Bay at this point in the series, but none of that matters if they can’t get past Clay Buchholz and the Red Sox tonight. Focusing In: Since Cobb returned to the mound on August 15, he has a 2.41 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 58 strikeouts in 59 2/3 innings. In case that doesn’t sound impressive enough, he only faced one team during that nine-start stretch who finished under .500—the Mariners, who he faced twice (including his worst start of the stretch at Safeco Field). If you draw the sample out to include the wild card game, Cobb has had a Game Score of at least 60 in seven of his last 10 outings. This season, Cobb faced the Red Sox four times, including three outings at Tropicana Field, and he accumulated a 5.16 ERA, 1.50 WHIP and 20 strikeouts in 22 2/3 innings. The most recent of those starts came on September 11 in Tampa, where he gave up three runs and allowed 10 base runners in 5 2/3 innings. In fact, since May 1, Cobb has only had two starts with a Game Score of 45 of lower in 17 tries—both against the Boston Red Sox. In the other corner is your 2013 ERA leader (if that pesky innings qualification was lowered to 100). And like Cobb, we can break down Clay Buchholz into pre- and post-injury performance. Before he was sidelined for more than three months with bursitis in his throwing shoulder, Buchholz was borderline dominant, going 9-0 in 12 starts with a 1.71 ERA, 1.02 ERA, 24.9 percent strikeout rate and 2.8 strikeout-to-walk rate. Every one of those numbers would have been a career-best for the Texan. Since he’s been back, the ERA (1.88) and WHIP (1.04) has remained shiny, but his strikeout rate is down to 16.5 percent—almost exactly in line with his past four seasons. The biggest difference between the Buchholz of recent memory and the Buchholz of 2013 has been his ability to keep the ball in the ballpark, despite pitching in one that allowed 153 homers on the season. Between 2011 and 2012, he allowed 35 homers in 272 innings, but this season that number was limited to just four in his 108 1/3 frames. As you’d expect, his HR/FB rate was less than half of his career rate in 2013 (4.5 percent versus 10.1 percent) since he showed no discernible change in batted ball outcomes during the season. But is 2013 the outlier or not? In 2010, the first season Buchholz began really using his cutter, he also had a much lower than “normal” home run rate (allowing just nine bombs in 173 2/3 innings). Looking at his current HR/FB rate and shrugging him off as unlucky during the 2013 season is just as shortsighted as saying he was the best pitcher in baseball because of his shiny ERA. Unfortunately for the Rays, Buchholz is likely coming into this matchup with a lot of confidence—in nine career starts at the Trop, he has a 2.26 ERA, 0.92 WHIP and 53 strikeouts in 55 2/3 innings. Just this year he’s had two starts against them, allowing a whopping zero runs in 13 innings with 19 strikeouts. In fact, he also has a career 2.57 ERA and 1.08 WHIP in 16 career starts indoors (versus a 3.81 ERA and 1.33 WHIP in the great outdoors). Matchup to Watch: My Prediction:
Bret Sayre is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @BretSayreBP
1 comment has been left for this article.
|
I can't believe anybody is even watching that series, I've never seen a more certain defeat. There are James Bond films with less predictable outcomes.