BP Comment Quick Links
April 25, 2013 BP UnfilteredPitcher BABIP and AgeOn Wednesday, the St. Paul Pioneer Press published a piece by Mike Berardino about how the Twins—well, more like one full-time employee of the Twins—are starting to explore sabermetrics. It's worth a read. The article won't leave you with the sense that the Twins are anywhere close to the cutting edge, relative to teams that aren't the Phillies, but at least they're not opposed to the idea of incorporating statistics into their decision making. Toward the end of the article, Berardino quizzes Twins GM Terry Ryan on some stats he uses:
Ryan is right to point out that Worley's elbow injury might have made him more hittable. But what about his contention that most young pitchers have high BABIPs? Here's pitcher BABIP broken down by age over the past 10 seasons, a period during which the league average was .293. Ryan is right in the sense that if you were to pluck a typical teenage pitcher out of A ball and put him in the American League, he'd probably have a high BABIP. But among pitchers who have made the majors, there's really no trend toward higher BABIPs at an early age. If anything, it's more likely to be the opposite​—there's probably some survivor bias in the stats above, since pitchers whose BABIPs increased over time would have tended to drop out of the sample sooner. Worley might be healthier and luckier this season than he was in 2012, but if he's anything like most big-league pitchers, another year of experience won't improve his skill at preventing hits on balls in play. Thanks to Ryan Lind for research assistance.
Ben Lindbergh is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @benlindbergh
19 comments have been left for this article.
|
I don't understand. Doesn't the graph show a downward trend? I know survivor bias and all that, but doesn't the basic graph exhibit Ryan's trend?