BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
January 2, 2013 BP UnfilteredThe Twins and SabermetricsThe Twins use sabermetrics. That is the takeaway from Parker Hageman’s interesting Twins Daily piece on Minnesota’s quantitative analysis. Hageman quotes Jack Goin, Minnesota’s Manager of Major League Administration and Baseball Research (and ostensibly the club’s lead quant), throughout the article. Here are some highlights:
Not one of Goin’s comments is groundbreaking, and that’s the point. The only staggering admission involves Minnesota’s recent ignorance of PITCHf/x data. Otherwise, Goin admits the Twins use a publicly available data source; one advanced enough to wow the casual fan and few others. In all likelihood, Minnesota is using more and better data than PITCHf/x. Goin admits to being okay with the perception that the Twins are analytical laggards—and why wouldn’t he be? He has no reason to tip his hand further because there is no comparative advantage gained with a 100 percent forthcoming nature. If you come away thinking the beliefs about the Twins are correct then consider this: What if they're intentionally misleading us? It's not like we'd know the difference.
Worth noting: Goin appears to have a Twitter account where he tweets out Baseball Prospectus material amongst other things.
R.J. Anderson is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @r_j_anderson
|
Anyone want to place bets (or arguments) on which team uses statistical analysis the least/worst?