BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
February 21, 2011 BP UnfilteredDepth Charts and PFM Openby Colin Wyers [UPDATE 2-21, 12:26 AM] Hi Folks, We have created an official updates page for the PFM and have filled requests for the raw data downloadable in CSV and TAB formats. There were also a few other minor updates that you'll see on that updates page. Thanks!
[UPDATE 2-17, 6:43 PM] We did some tinkering under the hood of the PFM between setting it live and right now, based on comments from you, the reader.
We've still got some things we're going to be adding--for one, we'll be adding my (meaning Marc's) rankings to the PFM as an optional column, so you can refer to the tiers I ranked players in just like you would refer to auction dollar values. Leave questions, concerns or ideas in the comments. There seems to be some concern that the projections in the PFM are based on 2010 data--that is not the case. You can see at the top of this page, in the biographical section for Hanley Ramirez, that his 2011 projection is present. That's the same projection you will find here on the Marlins' depth chart page and in the PFM, were you to look for Mr. Ramirez. That being said, the 2010 projections are still present on the player cards, in the PECOTA section towards the middle of the page. That data is not anywhere near the PFM though. The PFM is fed by the depth charts, so I hope your fears have been allayed. -Marc
I'll skip the flowery stuff and just tell you what you came here for: Enjoy. (As a note - the PFM and Depth Charts are only available to subscribers.)
Colin Wyers is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Follow @cwyers
BP Comment Quick Links sfastatsprof (10235) Will there be an xlsx file associated with the PFM data posted? In years past there was a download link at the top of the PFM that would allow a raw data download. rosborne (339) Are we going to be able to download the PFM file like we have in previous years? Thanks. carpoon (1814) I may be overlooking something, but it looks like it's running the PFM using 2010 projections. wilykat (19846) That's how it looks to me as well, unless the problem is that the individual player pages need to be reformatted... the PFM has Aubrey Huff ... R.A.Wagman (32721) Any plans to update the weighted means spreadsheet with depth chart data? Yes. We're using the Depth Charts to set the league run environment now, so we'll be doing updated weighted means for all players later in the week, and we'll include some link to the depth chart information (still trying to decide the best way to present them both). Feb 16, 2011 21:21 PM brianwilliams42 (29213) Noticing that Brett Gardner isn't on the Yankees depth chart or in PFM. Wharton93 (23153) hmmm....6x6 with Holds and OPS. No pitchers are projecting any Holds. And OPS "feels" underweighted (and SBs overweighted)---either that, or Rajai Davis is a stud even in OPS leagues. brooklyn55 (26639) All of a sudden, in trying to access the Pirates ... this message & similar message for all other teams. What ?? Jivas (649) I'm receiving a message saying they I have to subscribe to see the Depth Charts, even though I am a subscriber and I am currently logged in. Anyone else with this issue? saint09 (47194) Thankfully all those bugs were ironed out prior to release. Fortunately the perfectionists are all over it. brooklyn55 (26639) Obviously the Yanks to be the power & the glory ... they have to use only eight players in their lineup ... Guancous (39757) Wow, how much nicer is it for the PFM to save your leagues instead of saving the bookmarks elsewhere? Great tweak! jtc1984 (48905) the hits for batting are not recording in the points system only....rotiss ok....still no QS category listed John Douglass (53235) I thought I saw Holds in the pitcher categories a while ago, but maybe it's me. Could we have that added? Guancous (39757) Is there a way to remove a player that has been checked off as kept? Last year I accidentally marked Wesley Wright instead of David Wright and I had to input 199 players again. You should see the players that you've taken in the list at the top. If you highlight one (or more) of those players, and click Update, it will put them back into the player pool. Feb 16, 2011 20:51 PM nateac (54636) Victor Martinez is projected to hit only 4 HR with under 20 runs and RBIs? juiced (41014) Colin when I substitute "hits" as an offensive category for the typical BA in a 5x5 league I get numbers for all hitters on the other 4 categories except hits. If I leave it at BA, it does give me a BA. saint09 (47194) When entering keepers, the players checked as mine keep reverting to a price of 1 dollar. Can this be reviewed please. saint09 (47194) Auction. It'll show the correct price for a bit, but as I continue to enter more keepers, it reverts to a dollar... I can then remove and re-add my keepers, but it inevitably reverts again. McCaffery (46961) Last year I was able to sort PFM output by player name; this made plugging in keeper salaries much easier. I can't seem to find this capability on this year's version. Am I missing something? McCaffery (46961) As a possible answer to my own question; I assume that the sort function was removed in order to make the program work faster (especially during auctions with the inflation calculator is in use, necessitating constant refreshment). Richie (27368) Pitcher W-L records, especially for bad teams, are in dire need of correction. Looks like you may have neglected to factor in their expected run environments, team-wise. NotMrTibbs (55448) Great to see PFM again! yadenr (36923) 1. Kila Kaaihue is going to be a star! yerfdog (2723) If you turn on user-centric inflation and SGP and get rid of the SO category, all pitchers are valued at $1. ccseverson (24244) Someone needs to figure out how to get a minimum innings choice into the formula. It makes a huge difference on the value of middle relievers (and thus pitching) if you need to make 1000 or whatever innings as a Roti team. pobothecat (56629) PFM Total Bases projection The Total Bases problem has been fixed. Thanks to both of you who reported it. Feb 17, 2011 04:07 AM jimnabby (9296) I do not see a "Download CSV" button anywhere. Am I just missing it? jimnabby (9296) I take that back. I see it after submitting parameters, but in the past I could easily download the full file. I know that was asked above, but the only answer I saw said it was there...and it's not. zszalewski (37165) I'd like to 2nd this request. In the past I could download the raw data behind all of the projections and it was really useful stuff that I built into other excel templates for fantasy bball. It doesn't appear that it's possible to download this full data file anymore. That would be great if you could add this option back to PFM again! eliyahu (11036) Is there any way to change the league "position counts" once they've been submitted? There doesn't seem to be an edit function there, and I'd hate to re-input everything I already have because of a minor tweak (# of RPs) deniskoconnor (55735) I just entered all of my league parameters, which among other things, include 13 teams and 1 catcher per team. PFM is only returning 11 catchers in the result which does not seem to make any sense. hessshaun (41493) Are you setting your dollar values to the negative? In the past, when I had issues with my parameters, I just decreased the dollar amount. If I was at -$5, I went to -$10 and it did the trick. I am guessing the problem here was that the positional adjustment was OFF for some reason. Feb 17, 2011 09:00 AM eliyahu (11036) OK -- I don't know if you want to call this a bug, but RPs seem to be unrealistically undervalued by the PFM -- even in league with saves as a category -- unless you explicitly set a number of RPs in your league format. I don't think this is a bug. Even the best RP's will have trouble contributing as much to the SO, ERA, and WHIP categories as much as a league average starter might. Closers will net you SV, but the above average SP's will help you in four other categories. Feb 17, 2011 08:55 AM varmintito (27044) Haven't seen any big discrepancies for hitters, but some very weird results for pitching. My league's pitching categories are IP, W-L, ERA, WHIP, K, and a combined relief category (SV+HD-BS) that I did not enter into PFM. rosborne (339) Thanks for including MLB_ID on the csv file. This is a great help. batts40 (5854) I accidentally left the settings to MLB and it showed Pujols @ $50, which feels about right for my draft. However, when I changed it to NL-only, it bumps him down to $39, any idea why? kenneff (29478) My Roto league uses a $100 base rather than the normal 260. Previous versions of PFM allowed an easy change but the new one does not. There's boxes there to adjust but when you change to 100 you get error msgs. I've tried playing around with it but have been unable to get it to change to 100. Looks like a glitch. This was a result of a small problem in the code that checks to make sure the total budget is higher than hitter budget, and should be fixed now. Thanks! Feb 17, 2011 08:56 AM goldenyeti (6983) Sorry, but I'm still having a problem with adjusting the budget - if I try to change "total" or "hitters," I get the error message and it defaults back to the same values. Any advice? dREaDS Fan (51622) I've got the problem (believe mentioned above, too) where the salaries for my players (my players only - not other teams') get reset to $1 after saving. naehring (786) Love the depth charts, but I have a problem philosophically with posting only WARP values. I realize you are using WARP to compute estimated standings and that makes sense, however, many people are accessing these for help with fantasy baseball. Since WARP includes your calculation for defensive value, it is less useful to almost all fantasy formats. In every fantasy league I'm in, defense is either ignored completely (standard roto), or computes defense completely differently than your WARP calculations (Scoresheet). So, if I use this to rank players, I need to find a way to back out the fielding numbers. A column of just the hitting portion of WARP based on playing time estimates is what is really needed. (wouldn't VORP suffice?). Obviously, this is not an issue with pitchers. brooksp (7767) A bug: Thanks for letting us know about this issue. The calculations were never impacted, but the display was misleading. I believe I have corrected the display issue. Thanks for using PFM! Feb 17, 2011 09:17 AM jimnabby (9296) You seem to have fixed it on the display, but when I download data into a CSV file, it's not fixed. If I have "H" included for batters, the column shows up listing H totals for both batters and pitchers. If I have it included for both p's and b's, I get two identical columns. This causes me problems as I try to work with the data, and it doesn't seem like this is the way you would want to present output. Mike (54181) Also, I am curious about k/9 as a category is it weighted to IP? I prefer to use it rather than SO since my league has an innings cap, which makes strikeout efficiency a better measure of value rather than total strikeouts. Mooser (26842)
It's definitely higher than it used to be, and yes, that's intentional. I don't recall off the top of my head where Fangraph's rep-level is in terms of win percentage, but if I recall correctly I think we're at about the same place as the WAR on Baseball Reference in terms of total WAR(P) at the league level. Feb 17, 2011 09:30 AM Mooser (26842) Just checked. Fangraphs is a .290 winning percentage, thus 47 wins. Colin did you discuss replacement level in your series on new WARP? I cant find it. TangoTiger (57181) Fangraphs has just over 1000 wins above replacement, while Rally has it just under 900. That would set the win% level at close to .290 for Fangraphs and .320 for Rally (Baseball-Reference). Wharton93 (23153) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. Need to change the title to 'closed'...as PFM isn't open right now. Schaffpa71 (18646) Was just in PFM and it's not working. I click off the first 5 or 6 players with salaries, then hit update. It takes the guys off, but nothing shows in the "taken" field. A recent update moved the taken players information into its own collapsable section, so if you reload the page, you should see this new "Taken Players" section, which will update every time you click the update button. This way, you can hide or show the taken players as you go through the pre-draft and in-draft usage of the PFM to suit your needs. Feb 17, 2011 10:00 AM Schaffpa71 (18646) Hmm....all the 'taken players' stuff is working now (it definitely was NOT updating before). jtanker33 (47067) Just ran the PFM and see that QS and Holds have been added, which is awesome, but that the values for QS and Holds for all pitchers are zero. dREaDS Fan (51622) This I don't understand: John Collins (110) The WARPs listed for some part-time players seem to be off by a factor of ten or more. Viciedo of the Chisox is listed as -2.2 WARP, despite only 108 plate appearances, making him -11 or -13 WARP over a full season, while putting up Mike Jacobs-ish numbers. Ben Revere's WARP seems to be similarly off. Don't know what happened there or if it affected team PECOTA projections. Brian Oakchunas (9790) Yeah, I was wondering how Chris Carter was going to manage to hit 12 homers in just 129 plate appearances and still have a negative WARP. This isn't your grandfather's replacement level. ciarfella (7880) Are the numbers based on 2010 projections or Marc Normandin (15622) They are 2011 projections. You can see at the top of this page, in the biographical section for Hanley, that his 2011 projection is present. That's the same projection you will find here on the Marlins' depth chart page. Mike (54181) Marc (or someone else), can somebody comment on the QS situation. There's been a number of comments left here so I assume you guys are working on it, but no one your end has responded to any of the comments here. At the moment it's no longer available as an option. I assume not forever. Any idea on when we might expect it to return (with stats)? Minutes, hours or days? rosborne (339) Maybe this isn't that big of a deal, but there still doesn't appear to be a simple way to download the csv file for all players. Are there plans to add a simple procedure? jimnabby (9296) It would be nice to get a response to this, but I think the interim answer to your question is to do what I do: select every category and set the minimum dollar amount to show to something ridiculously low, like -$100. I think that will give you the whole data set. Sure would be nice not to have to do that, though. sfastatsprof (10235) I raised this question very early on in the thread and still wish this could be done. I am doing it the way you describe.. select a bunch of categories and set the minimum display at $-50 or $-100. HOWEVER.. this still mixes the batters and pitchers. What was nice about being able to download ONE pfmdata csv sheet is that it contained TWO SEPERATE TABS - one for batters, one for pitchers. Any chance a BP staffer can address this? I think more people have used that download feature in the past than is being realized. jberkon (28225) Agreed - the depth chart-adjusted weighted means spreadsheet was always made available once the depth charts posted. It would be enormously helpful to make that available, with MLBAM ID appended. Otherwise, it becomes very hard to use the data, except directly in PFM. The CSV and TAB downloads should respect the current filter setting. I realize this isn't as easy as not having to use PFM, but once you have the results, "P" lists pitchers and "Util" lists batters. So, you can easily set the filter twice and download two separate files. Feb 18, 2011 11:34 AM ccweinmann (1412) Please respond to holds / quality starts question. Thanks MHaywood1025 (46036) Can we start getting in to particular player projections here? In particular, why is Evan Longoria projected to hit .264 when he is a career .283 hitter, has never hit below .272 in a season, and has increased his average every year in the majors, ending last year at .294. BJSchumacher (55578) PFM is broken. I trust you guys are working on it? It would have been nice if this was throughly beta tested BEFORE you went live with it. Changing it on the fly 2-3 times a day is not a good thing. dREaDS Fan (51622) Think this is a bug: We've had a lot of instances of having previous data being stored in browser caches causing issues with PFM (I had it happen myself while testing). If persistent settings of any type are lost, please try using a hard refresh of the browser first - i.e. holding SHIFT and clicking Refresh. Feb 18, 2011 11:37 AM What you are doing is going from asking it to track which players are on your team (user centric = 1) to telling it not to track the players on your team (user centric = 0), so it stops doing so and forgets which players you had marked as on your team because it figures you do not want it to use that information. So the use of the information of whether players are on your team or not on your team is inextricably intertwined with the tracking of that information. So under the current paradigm, this is intentional. Feb 18, 2011 14:03 PM TangoTiger (57181) If you sort the batters by descending WARP, and select the players with enough PA to get you to 180,000, you will get about 570 wins, which is just about correct. Shadetree42 (33584) How about putting important product release information where it belongs -- on the home page and on the Fantasy page? We posted an update tonight that updates the interface for setting points values and should rectify the issues reported regarding point values not working or being reset to zero for output and downloading text files. We hope that the interface improvements make using the PFM for points leagues much more enjoyable. Thanks! Feb 18, 2011 17:29 PM ccweinmann (1412) I'm trying not to be a jerk about this. My primary league uses holds and quality starts and is drafting right now. Last year, PFM included these categories. I have been assuming this year's PFM would has well. First, you ignored the various questions about whether / when those categories would be added. Then, you said they would be added today, but I haven't seen them. All of this has appeared in comments so that I find myself searching through comments to find out the status. A straight, timely, and logically located answer, would be helpful. I am happy to report that due to Colin's hard work, the PFM now supports quality starts (QS) and holds. Feb 18, 2011 23:47 PM schlaack (6216) Is it possible to include quality starts as a category for analysis. My league uses quality starts. Believe it or not, there is a small group of us out here who think wins are dumb. Crazy right? jimnabby (9296) When might we expect to be able to download the raw data directly? And a suggestion: a hard link to the raw data (as opposed to a button we have to click) would be great, so members can automate downloading PFM updates. Thanks! Shadetree42 (33584) Yes, please. jberkon (28225) Agreed. The inability to export the Depth Charts-adjusted data into an Excel spreadsheet - without going through PFM and having to then sort hitters/pitchers - is really making this product hard to use. Every other projections system, even the free ones, make this feature available. And BP always did in the past. When can we expect this? saint09 (47194) Probably too early to say, but any initial thoughts on the Miggy Cabrera DUI/alcohol issue and impact on his 2011 season? eliyahu (11036) Discussed this above, but there's two things with PFM that still bother me and I'd appreciate if it could be addressed: TangoTiger (57181) The very best closers should be worth 15-20$. I just ran the default PFM and Nathan was at 18$. The condition that I specified was that all pitchers are rostered under the "P" position and that there are no specific "RP" positions in the league. Valuation of closers are going to be somewhat low because the top end SP's and the middle of the pack SP's will help a team in four categories where as an elite closer would help in one category significantly (saves, obviously) and perhaps two or three others as well. This results in, as others have said, elite closers falling into the middle of the pack of SP's, and not all of the closers even being "above replacement level" in a typical 9 P roster scenario. Feb 20, 2011 12:37 PM lowellfield (32313) PFM keeps "forgetting" kept players I've entered the salary for. I've tried many times, saving along the way. Very frustrating. The issues that existed for taken players should be resolved now (and were fixed in a release update a few days ago). Please make sure you're using the latest version by doing a hard refresh (hold shift and click the refresh button) and if you still have trouble, please email Customer Service. Thanks! Feb 20, 2011 12:43 PM dsdanese (59563) Sorry...I have a ton of questions. First year using this Yes, for straight drafts, the dollar figures can be interpreted as a relative valuation on whatever scale you specified for the budget. Typically I use a total budget of 100 and then assign a percentage to hitters and pitchers, like 65/35 or something. That part is personal preference, and there's a whole lengthy discussion we could have about the optimal settings. Feb 20, 2011 12:42 PM Michael Bodell (89) Where is SSIM? Usually in the past scoresheet scores is a catagory. eliyahu (11036) For some reason, can't reply to Tango above, so I'll comment here: Glad you like the updated roster and scoring categories interface! We are working hard to roll out updates that address user concerns and this was one of the things we wanted to improve. Feb 20, 2011 12:39 PM TangoTiger (57181) I agree, it would definitely have been a bug. When I do my valuations, I don't do a RP/SP split, and simply let the forecast and league structure dictate the value. And that value is what I said, that the top relievers would come in at 15-20$. rosborne (339) Thanks for adding VORP to the pitching categories, but I don't think it was added to the hitting categories. VORP should be enabled for both hitters and pitchers. If you are not seeing it, please do a hard refresh to make sure you are not using a cached version of the page (hold shift while you click reload in the browser). If you continue to have problems please email Customer Service. Thanks for using PFM! Feb 20, 2011 12:38 PM naehring (786) I see that VORP is also added to the depth charts. Bravo! Thanks for addressing the concerns that were expressed here so quickly. Kevin Wilson (46534) Would there be anyway to create a Saves+Holds combo category? I play in a roto league where they are combined. Simply selecting both categories individually would throw off value. For completeness, I'm posting a comment, to close the loop on that particular means of notification--I have put together a formal updates page for PFM, complete with its own comments. I have also added the downloadable CSV and TAB data files for the entire dataset to the landing page (see links at the top), and added a comments section to the help document. We made a few other small tweaks, including adding some statistics and such as well. Check out the updates page for more: Feb 20, 2011 21:30 PM Nailfan (3486) Thank you for the downloadable database. Based on the comments above, I'm not the only one who will use this. As someone who participates in multiple fantasy leagues, the complete database makes my early planning much easier. mutusliber (56094) Is there any possibility of optionally adding each player's MLBAM ID to the info displayed/outputted to CSV and TAB? The MLB ID should be included in the output that you download, in both the raw downloaded files and the post valuation downloaded files. I believe it has been included since the initial release and we have not had any other reports of issues with this feature, so if you are having trouble, please email Customer Service so we can help you out. Thanks for using PFM! Feb 21, 2011 08:19 AM tribe24 (33291) Any chance CGs could be added as a category for pitchers. I asked last year but to no avail. Not sure how easy or hard that tweak would be. jimnabby (9296) I"ll add my sincere thanks for the download files. My homemade Excel-based software can finally automatically download RAW PFM data and interpret it properly without any work from me (like it already could with Baseball HQ and other data). Fabulous! jimnabby (9296) Sigh. Never mind, I can't, because you're changing the link name (the csv filename) every time you update. rosborne (339) Thanks again for all the work. It works great. mtgannon (47254) Our 16-team roto league weights OBP, HR and R more than RBI and SB. For example, the top team in HRs gets 32 points, while the top team in RBI only gets 16, etc. So, a high OBP/HR guy like Kevin Youkilis is very valuable in our league. Same idea on the pitching side. Is there any way or does anybody have any suggestions for how to model this in PFM. Thanks. hessshaun (41493) I just completely ignore SB in PFM and rely on my PECOTA spreadsheet for bags, generally later in the draft. As for your RBI issue, personally, I would run the numbers with and without RBIs and see what happens. It may pop up a few names that surprise you and from there you will know what expect in terms of their RBI production. zstine1 (32591) there have been several requests but no comment on the timeline for the return of upside? i am trying to decide whether to resuscribe or not before my draft. We have posted version 2.2, which includes a custom player pool option under league used, allowing you to select a custom subset of MLB teams to be used as your player pool. Feb 23, 2011 16:08 PM mtgannon (47254) Is there a way to use PFM to rank my players based on particular categories, but also download all of the player info? For example, I want to rank my pitchers on W, Saves, ERA, WHIP and Ks, but would also like to download to excel IP info so I can do a Ks/9 IPs calculation as well. Any thoughts? Thanks. mutusliber (56094) Bug I've just stumbled on... zstine1 (32591) another potential bug... geefsu (27636) Don't now where else to ask this . . . Can anyone give me an ETA on the Player Cards? When will the 2011 cards be published? dREaDS Fan (51622) By chance is PECOTA/PFM over-penalizing Colorado pitchers for pitching in Coors? Mike (54181) Ok, I asked this on the PFM update thread, but got no reply. What's the planned update schedule for the PFM/Depth Carts? Seems like last off-season they were updated once a week. Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
|



211 comments have been left for this article.
All is forgiven ...
... but when I click "submit PFM parameters" shouldn't something happen? (Are the lights dimming at BP Headquarters as the new servers strain under the load of pent up PFM demand?)
Something should, yes. If it continues to be a problem, please send Customer Service a message with your details (operating system, browser, etc.) and someone will look into it.
I believe this is the same problem people have using Internet Explorer, when they click "reply" to a comment and the site doesn't actually reply to the article. It's called "compatibility view."
If you are having problems, try changing your "compatibility view." This should also make it so you can reply to comments in the comment-threads.
I could be wrong, but it seemed to help for me just now...
I believe the problem, which was pointed out in IE and may have existed in other browsers, is rectified now. Please do email Customer Service if you notice it in the future.
Collin,
Ben's post fixes the issue of the PFM working for me and I now see the Download CSV tab after I submit parameters. However, I thought that in years past there was a button at the top of the PFM screen that allowed you to download the raw pfmdata file WITHOUT having to submit any particular parameters. In other words, you are downloading the playing time adjusted forecasts which themselves are invariant to PFM parameters. Will such a download link be added, or should I continue to submit default parameters in order to just download the CSV file for the playing time adjusted stats I want while disregarding the player values? I hope I am making sense. And I should add "Thank You" to this post.. I look foward to this release each year.
*apologies for not spelling your first name correctly. Ugh.
Ah, I understand now. We'll have something downloadable soon, whether it's part of the same spreadsheet as the weighted means or something else.
Thanks Colin; this would be enormously helpful. Especially since PFM doesn't have the MLBAM ID # in its output.
Not tried it yet but surely you're joking, this was sold as one one of the big improvements this year :-(
OK tried it now and the MLB ID *is* there!
MLB ID has been in every downloadable format of the 2011 PFM since its publication a couple weeks ago. If you have any downloads that do not include MLB ID, please let Customer Service know. So far we haven't gotten any such reports. Thanks!
I ran the PFM and the data returned was based on last years(2010) projection data. i.e. McCann numbers (see below) show up in 2010 projection on his baseball card. Not sure if
you used those numbers to calculate or just printed it
on the output.
PLAYER POS LG TEAM AGE $$$ PA IP Inflation R HR RBI SB OPS
Mccann, Brian C NL ATL 27 $123.96 551 73 19 71 4 .821