With Opening Day a little more than a week away, here is a look at the projected rosters for each of the 16 National League clubs following conversations with club executives and media members. Keep in mind these are projected rosters and subject to change. American League lineups are here. You can also look at the fantasy depth charts at any time to see our latest updated projections.
I also agree that the format isn't so good. A chart would be much better. I know you don't have the width to do a league all at once, but you could split it up by division.
Love the format ... all on one page has some advantages that I like ... I can find answers to my questions without clicking around to different web pages ...
It is 100% certain that Jason Maxwell will not be on the Nationals roster opening day, nor at all this season. Jason has not played in the majors since the 2001 season with the Twins.
On the other hand, Justin Maxwell at least stands an outside chance of being called up to the Nats this year, if he can start making contact with the ball.
I second this request. I read somewhere reputable (sorry for lack of citation, would have been SI, ESPN, or TSN) that Desmond looked to start and Guzman would become the utility guy.
The decision to excuse Miller and Rick VandenHurk's poor performance seems to be leading the Fish towards a decision to make Clay Hensley the club's fifth starter.
Sammy Gervacio is going to be a big part of the Astros pen this year - heck he could be their closer by the end of the year. But, he doesn't even show up in this article - oversight? or do you know something I don't know?
McLouth has been hitting 7th and 8th during his prolonged slump this Spring. How much of a chance is there he loses at bats in some sort of a platoon and gets dropped out of the leadoff spot in the batting order?
Off topic, but does anyone know where in blazes BP hides their Park Factor listings? I know it's tucked in on one of the dozens of pages on the Statistics part of the website, but I also vaguely recall that it's not intuitive which one.
This quest has so far withstood an exhaustive use of BP's own search engine (on "PF", "Park Factor" and "Park Effects"), and a google search on this website domain. Good Grief. It's only fundamental to context-aware analysis of baseball numbers, no reason you should be able to actually *find* it on BP's site, is there?
For 2009 park factors (in a quick search, I couldn't find 2010 PFs), go to:
Statistics->Equivalent Average->Team Totals
There you'll find a column for PF, again for last year.
Oh, one place you can get the 2010 PFs are in the book in the box on the first page of each team's section. Don't know if those are anywhere on the website.
Thanks dpratola. (I'm sure that page would have been one of the first twenty I looked in.) I had also tried the annual, where in the past they'd always put them in a table up front, but didn't realize they were now buried in parenthetical comments on each team's writeup.
By the way, it looks like the PFs in both the annual and the webpage you cited are 3-year averages (I'm assuming average, perhaps weighted by recency). At least, the ones on the site were identical to the book for the first 4 teams I compared. That's nice as it's a bigger sample. I just wish it hadn't been such highly classified info. ;)
No roster spots for Carlos Villanueva or Mike MacDougal? Cubs will need either Colvin or Fuld on the roster. Nady can't throw and Hoffpauir can barley play the field.
I take it that some of the bench and bullpen details here are of the informed-guess variety? (i.e. no actual announcements from the clubs)
Meaning ... there's still a shot for Bowker ?
(Can you imagine that clubhouse chat? "Bowks, buddy, have a seat. How're the wife and kids? Great, yeah, listen. We know you're the most physically fit dude ever in the history of man. And so intense at the plate you're actually scaring Wilson. You've hit .603 this spring with, lemme see here, 187 rbi's. And god knows we are desperate --- I mean DESPERATE --- for a real live adult bat in this lineup. So, hey, put it all together and, well, obviously we're keeping Matt Downs and sending you back to Fresno. You understand. On your way out, have Huff come in here, will ya? Sabean wants to give him a raise."
John, I'm a fan of your work. But this format..., not so much.