BP Comment Quick Links
![]() | |
March 9, 2010 Team Health ReportsDetroit Tigers
The Summary: The numbers for Detroit look pretty bad, but a deeper look shows that pitchers like Joel Zumaya, Jeremy Bonderman, and Dontrelle Willis provide an anchor no staff could recover from. On the plus side, the Tigers kept Magglio Ordonez healthy through his contract, have Miguel Cabrera healthy despite worries about his waistline, and showed good work keeping Carlos Guillen and Brandon Inge on the field late last season. More positively, they did great work with Rick Porcello and, to a lesser extent, Justin Verlander, which allowed the team to say, "Yeah, we'll take on Max Scherzer," a talented pitcher who's had mechanical questions since coming into the league. This year's Tigers look to be more athletic and to have less injury risk beyond the obvious candidates. That makes it a real make-or-break season for the medical staff.
The Facts The Cost: Detroit got hit hard by injuries in 2009, losing $26.9 million; they have lost $52.6 million over the last three years. Nate Robertson, Bonderman, Zumaya, and Willis each made multiple trips to the disabled list last season, combining to cost Detroit $22.2 million. The majority of the rest came from Guillen's trip to the disabled list with shoulder inflammation, which added $4.3 million to the Tigers' dollars lost. Despite losing nearly double the league average, Detroit made some big moves in the offseason, moving players that were getting expensive in Curtis Granderson and Edwin Jackson. The Tigers then turned around and found the money to sign Johnny Damon to a one-year, $8-million deal and bring in closer Jose Valverde for two years at just $14 million. It makes the trades appear as if they were less about getting rid of Granderson's and Jackson's rising salaries and more about getting the two young guys in Scherzer and Austin Jackson. The Big Risk: He's barely old enough to drink. Yes, it's kind of cliche to say that about a talented young pitcher, but it might remind us why pitchers like Porcello are such huge risks. Forget the millions of dollars or the loss of talent if he's to go down. Instead, just focus on the fact that for most 20-year-olds, we don't let them drink legally. We don't trust them with rental cars, for Pete's sake. They're simply, literally, not mature. For all the things I disagree with Dr. Mike Marshall on, the one I agree with wholeheartedly is the idea of making sure that the "anatomical age" is known as much as the chronological age. Until Porcello is physically mature, he simply can't take on the kind of pitching load that someone who is mature can. Now, I'll acknowledge that Porcello might be physically mature. The Tigers might know this, but most teams don't. And we only need to look at The Comeback to understand why this is important. The biggest question I have this year is if removing hard pitch counts and allowing him to use all his pitches will help or hurt his efficiency. An efficient 15-16 PPI Porcello would be, well, Roy Halladay. An inefficient one would be just another guy on the slag pile of arms out back of MLB's offices. The Comeback: What if you did everything right and still couldn't stop something bad from happening? That's the issue with Bonderman and with every young pitcher. The Tigers knew every risk, used everything they had in their arsenal to keep Bonderman healthy, but he still ended up like this. Is that inevitable? Did the Tigers not do something? Can young pitchers just simply not put up innings like that before passing the nexus? No one knows, but the hope is that despite that mystery, that the knowns of orthopaedic surgery can get Bonderman back. The time off should be some help, and there are lots of positives we've seen on his road back. Now, if we could just stop this from happening to the next Bonderman... who may very well be Rick Porcello.
The Trend: The Tigers have been hit by some big injuries, both in terms of dollars and value. For the most part, those don't come down solely on the shoulders of Kevin Rand and his staff, but it does make it hard to tell where they're making a real difference. They're solid with maintenance, as shown with players like Guillen and Ordonez. The strength and conditioning staff is given high marks, both by players and by other people in the industry. The accepted risk makes it difficult to get a true read here, but in enough of a sample size, maybe the lack of any distinguishing characteristics aside from the pure results is the result itself.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Will, may we have a comment on Justin Verlander? Whoever wrote his season synopsis in the BP annual wasn't too sunny about his workload.
More starts, more pitches. I like that they waited until he passed the nexus to turn up the dial, but we still don't know. PIPP likes players that establish themselves at the 200 inning level, which he's done 3 yrs now.