Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

Last year, I made fantasy infographics for each position, describing where players contribute the most in the standard 5×5 categories in a streamlined and easy-to-read fashion. I’ve tweaked my work in the offseason and I am bringing them back in a slightly different form with a slightly different process.

I’m still only comparing like positions to each other; for each position I take the top 30 players as listed by Mike Gianella, break them down into tiers, and come up with statistical averages and standard deviations using our very own PECOTA system. I did this so that we can compare like things to like things and to serve as a prep for the other graphs that are coming down the line. I’m sorry to say that the values and averages aren’t public at this time, so I can’t quite give you my formula here. Also there will be a big OBP graph at the end of the series as well as a graph that compares players to each other regardless of position, which was something of a hot request last year.

How to use this graph plus notes
This is a radar graph that is split out to five tiers. The fuller the graph, the better the player as PECOTA sees it. These graphs are also color-coded and they mirror Mike Gianella’s tier system; yellow = four-star player and so forth. There are a few things I’d like to address here. Catchers don’t steal many bases so their contributions in that category should be seen as a bonus only. Matt Wieters has a tiny radar because PECOTA doesn’t like him to get very many at-bats, this may or may not be adjusted in the near future as we tweak playing time. These players are in no way ranked in this order. I don’t value Salvador Perez over Brian McCann; they simply exist in the same tier.

My intent in creating these was to make a quick visual reference guide to see where certain guys can help in certain categories. For example, Lucroy is more balanced but Posey provides a ton of value in home runs over Lucroy, which makes a huge difference in how I see those players.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
faztradamus
1/06
Oh my Hitchens... this is awesome. A really different look than last season. Love it!
rzt101
1/06
Great data viz tool
sam19041
1/06
Hey Mau, this is great and a nice improvement over last year. One question / suggestion (and this applies both to the graphics and to the writeups: what about volatility in the forecasts? In other words, a $6 catcher could have a range of outcomes that would move his value anywhere from -$6 to $16. In contrast, a $12 catcher might have a range of likely outcomes that would move his value from $10 to $14.

It canbe very valuable to know this when bidding. And PECOTA has (or had) upside/downside type scores (standard deviation of forecast perhaps). The fantasy coverage only occasionally addresses this. And I would think that visual representation would be one nice way to show it. This knowledge can be huge for fantasy bidding/drafting strategy.

Any thoughts on how we could see this going forward in the fantasy coverage? Thanks!
MRubio52
1/06
You know this is something I can do in graph form. Very much understand volatility concerns you raise and will address them in my coverage.
TeamPineTar
1/06
Wow. Nice improvements over last year, Mauricio. Love the radar graphs. Great work!
brentdaily
1/06
Clear indicator Lucroy number one? His graphic is home plate.
MRubio52
1/07
I love Lucroy but it's just too tough to pass up on the power+avg skillset Posey brings to the table. I still go Posey at one and Lucroy at two.
lipitorkid
1/06
What program did you use to create and/or export/finish this infographic? Last year was cool, this is the coolest.
MRubio52
1/07
I use excel to generate the deviation numbers and to create a visual frame of reference in terms of a graph then I use photoshop to hand draw them in. One template copy it across, rinse and repeat.
boatman44
1/06
Great graphics Mau,the bee's knees for instant study. I think come next year that Yan Gomes web will stretch a little further, has he still has a smidgen of upside that can be dragged out, being he is Brazilian , and not brought up in a baseball environment, just saying :)
MRubio52
1/07
He's an interesting name, I see where the growth potential can come and even if he falls victim to catcher offense variability he is very useful in fantasy. Big fan of his.
username49
1/06
Brian McCann is Buster Posey with a poopy average. I would never have realized that if it weren't for these tools!!!
ctt8410
1/06
The symmetry of Derek Norris' plot is hypnotizing.
MRubio52
1/06
It's my second favorite behind Lucroy.
MRubio52
1/07
Thanks for all the kind words you guys, appreciate the feedback.
wilymo
1/07
damn it, every time we light the chirinos-signal, rene rivera shows up
BrettLarter
1/07
I'm interested how Wieters' graph got so small but he's still ranked above people?
TheArtfulDodger
1/08
This is why the intro is helpful! Wieters graph is small because PECOTA doesn't like his playing time at present (this will likely change as updates roll in throughout the winter/spring), but the ranking/tiers are based on Mike Gianella's tiered article, not based on the graphs themselves.
davescottofakron
1/08
Only 25 here. Disappointed not to see Welington Castillo.
majnun
1/11
If he's not in 25, probably not as disappointed as you would have been to see it
chrisw
1/13
Love this viz tool. Only suggestion would be put AVG up top/middle and RUNS and SBs on one side and RBI and HRs on the other. That way you will visually be able to see that certain players are speed or power leaning...since usually its either/or.
dbiester
1/20
Honestly, I do not love this. It looks cooler than last year's, but last year's color differentiations were much easier for me to understand at a glance than the globby shapes. So maybe instead of coloring the whole plate the color of the player's tier, use different colors at the different levels of expected performance in the 5 categories? It might look a bit psychedelic, but it also might be easier to comprehend at first glance. Anyway I do appreciate the work and I will probably get used to the globs enough to understand it.